Clear Channel pushing for indecency regulations on satellite

PHBeerman · Post by **PHBeerman** » July 13, 2005 11:39 am

Parrot Monkey wrote:Like I’ve said, not everyone, but more often then not there’s a significant equation that comes into play in these parts:

BNer = Hypocrite

One thing that I do not believe that you could call any of us who are in this thread is a hypocrite. We all stand behind our convictions pretty solidly.

Jahfin · Post by **Jahfin** » July 13, 2005 11:40 am

LIPH wrote:
Jahfin wrote:You must be blind because he's already said this very thread doesn't interest him but he continues to post anyway.
"this thread" isn't "your comments". Unless you and a1aara really are the same person.

Where did I say anything about this thread being my comments? I didn't. And there you go with the same ol' asinine BS that alaara and I are the same person. Unlike some of you people I have NEVER posted here under a different screen name. Thank goodness there are boards out there where I don't have to tolerate the antics of the likes of you and your elementary school behavior.

Jahfin · Post by **Jahfin** » July 13, 2005 11:42 am

PHBeerman wrote:
Jahfin wrote: You must be blind because he's already said this very thread doesn't interest him but he continues to post anyway.
*Correction*

I said that everyone agrees with the premise of this thread, but I still had to grasp at the chance to get my daily fill of "Joenathan's blood pressure rising"

You keep referring to me as "Joenathan" which is NOT my name. As for my blood pressure rising, that's another one of your assumptions. I'm merely calling you on your endless BS that grew tiresome eons ago.

Parrot Monkey · Post by **Parrot Monkey** » July 13, 2005 11:43 am

PHBeerman wrote:One thing that I do not believe that you could call any of us who are in this thread is a hypocrite. We all stand behind our convictions pretty solidly.

It’s not all the time and I do see that you stand behind your convictions, but there’s just way to many times where people here say they don’t like when a certain thing is posted and end up posting on the subject themselves and/or posting in a thread about it.

rednekkPH · Post by **rednekkPH** » July 13, 2005 11:44 am

Parrot Monkey wrote:Well, I see attempts, and I stress attempts, for the clique to try to gang up on be and pretend the whole reissue deal is complete crap. When I group of people tries to gang up, I see that as an attempt to instill fear.

We're not pretending -to many of us, the reissue deal is complete crap.

And why do you see a group of people who are expressing viewpoints contrary to yours as an attempt at instilling fear?

Post by **SMLCHNG** » July 13, 2005 11:44 am

Sheesh.. not again...

PHBeerman · Post by **PHBeerman** » July 13, 2005 11:45 am

SMLCHNG wrote:
Sheesh.. not again...

Sorry Queenie. I'll stop now.

Post by **SMLCHNG** » July 13, 2005 11:48 am

PHBeerman wrote:
SMLCHNG wrote:
Sheesh.. not again...
Sorry Queenie. I'll stop now.

Thanks, Troy. Everyone has their opinions and all that.. it's just the bickering gets kinda tiring..

Jahfin · Post by **Jahfin** » July 13, 2005 11:48 am

SMLCHNG wrote:
Sheesh.. not again...

As I've said in another post, I've done my very best to play nice with this crowd but it works both ways. If people are going to continue to stir up trouble, I'm not going to sit idly by and let them get away with it. I'm going to continue to stand up to them and call them on their BS, which is exactly what it is. Like so many needless attacks on PM as of late, this thread has again turned into an attack on him for his stance on the Buffett reissues. What in the world that has to do with Clear Channel is beyond me.

Post by **SMLCHNG** » July 13, 2005 11:50 am

Jahfin wrote: I'm not going to sit idly by and let them get away with it.

I know, Jonathan.. you've said that many a time. But like I said many a time.. the whole thing is getting old.

Parrot Monkey · Post by **Parrot Monkey** » July 13, 2005 11:50 am

I have prime examples of the hypocrite thing do to back me up. Rednekk said many times over the reissue deal is crap and he hates it being brought up, as does Ringling Ringling…

The follwing is from the Meet Me in Margaritaville version of Volcano thread:

RinglingRingling wrote:
Oh, for a second, I thought you were sounding like Parrot Monkey. Guess I was wrong.

Here’s an intimidation attempt.

Here is a direct quote from the Teddy Ruxpin thread:

rednekkPH wrote:Does it come with original artwork, and liner notes to give credit to the sweatshop employees who assembled it?

I’ll be damned! He brought it up without me!

H-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-i-c-a-l.

LIPH · Post by **LIPH** » July 13, 2005 11:51 am

Parrot Monkey wrote:
PHBeerman wrote:One thing that I do not believe that you could call any of us who are in this thread is a hypocrite. We all stand behind our convictions pretty solidly.
It’s not all the time and I do see that you stand behind your convictions, but there’s just way to many times where people here say they don’t like when a certain thing is posted and end up posting on the subject themselves and/or posting in a thread about it.

So what you're saying is that if people see something that they don't like they shouldn't comment on it because they don't like it? It most be nice to live in Utopia.

rednekkPH · Post by **rednekkPH** » July 13, 2005 11:55 am

Parrot Monkey wrote: Here’s an intimidation attempt.

Here is a direct quote from the Teddy Ruxpin thread:
rednekkPH wrote:Does it come with original artwork, and liner notes to give credit to the sweatshop employees who assembled it?
I’ll be damned! He brought it up without me!

H-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-i-c-a-l.

HUH???? Where is the intimidation? Where did I try to scare you? Where did I threaten you?

Cubbie Bear · Post by **Cubbie Bear** » July 13, 2005 11:56 am

We have too much electrical stuff here. I can't get any clear channels

Parrot Monkey · Post by **Parrot Monkey** » July 13, 2005 11:56 am

SMLCHNG wrote:I know, Jonathan.. you've said that many a time. But like I said many a time.. the whole thing is getting old.

I find the attacks being made against me where people are trying tick me off in threads I haven’t even posted in yet, or are about an completely different subject, to really be getting old.

Jahfin · Post by **Jahfin** » July 13, 2005 11:57 am

LIPH wrote:
Parrot Monkey wrote:
PHBeerman wrote:One thing that I do not believe that you could call any of us who are in this thread is a hypocrite. We all stand behind our convictions pretty solidly.
It’s not all the time and I do see that you stand behind your convictions, but there’s just way to many times where people here say they don’t like when a certain thing is posted and end up posting on the subject themselves and/or posting in a thread about it.
So what you're saying is that if people see something that they don't like they shouldn't comment on it because they don't like it? It most be nice to live in Utopia.

No, that's what you're saying. I'm referring to people going into threads they've already said that don't interest them just so they can post things like "so" or accuse people of posting under the same name. That's entirely different than going into a thread to offer some constructive criticism. What PHbeerman and others do is akin to the behavior of a three year old that get their kicks from the supposed misery of others. Kinda speaks for itself but unfortunately too few of us around here are willing to stand up to folks like that so they keep doing it anyway. Like I said, that got old a very, very, very, long time ago.

Cubbie Bear · Post by **Cubbie Bear** » July 13, 2005 11:58 am

Jahfin wrote:
LIPH wrote:
Parrot Monkey wrote:
PHBeerman wrote:One thing that I do not believe that you could call any of us who are in this thread is a hypocrite. We all stand behind our convictions pretty solidly.
It’s not all the time and I do see that you stand behind your convictions, but there’s just way to many times where people here say they don’t like when a certain thing is posted and end up posting on the subject themselves and/or posting in a thread about it.
So what you're saying is that if people see something that they don't like they shouldn't comment on it because they don't like it? It most be nice to live in Utopia.
No, that's what you're saying. I'm referring to people going into threads they've already said that don't interest them just so they can post things like "so" or accuse people of posting under the same name. That's entirely different than going into a thread to offer some constructive criticism. What PHbeerman and others do is akin to the behavior of a three year old that get their kicks from the supposed misery of others. Kinda speaks for itself but unfortunately too few of us around here are willing to stand up to folks like that so they keep doing it anyway. Like I said, that got old a very, very, very, long time ago.

HERE, present and accounted for

Parrot Monkey · Post by **Parrot Monkey** » July 13, 2005 11:59 am

rednekkPH wrote:HUH???? Where is the intimidation? Where did I try to scare you? Where did I threaten you?

Your post for earlier today wasn’t intimidating, but Ringling’s from the MMIM Volcano thread was. Your post in the Ruxpin thread was simply you being a punk to me when I was nowhere near that subject you loathe.

Cubbie Bear · Post by **Cubbie Bear** » July 13, 2005 11:59 am

Larry and I got very, very old a long time ago too

Post by **SMLCHNG** » July 13, 2005 12:01 pm