Posted: July 13, 2005 11:25 am
What was the question? I just play along waiting for the rant.Jahfin wrote: I see your self righteousness got in the way of you answering any of my questions.
Jimmy Buffett discussion
http://www.buffettnews.com/forum/
What was the question? I just play along waiting for the rant.Jahfin wrote: I see your self righteousness got in the way of you answering any of my questions.
If all else fails, pick on someone's spelling, grammar, etc.rednekkPH wrote:Intimidation??? Do you own a dictionary?Parrot Monkey wrote:So many of you say you hate me bringing up the remaster topic but you do it yourselves when you decide to drop intimidation on me. Kind of hypocritical, eh?
Yes, I see it as the clique trying to intimidate me.rednekkPH wrote:
Intimidation??? Do you own a dictionary?
You answered a question I didn't ask. I didn't I say you had no right to question anyone's comments. All I meant was if something means so little to you why don't you just ignore it?Jahfin wrote:Just because his comments don't carry any weight with me doesn't mean I have no right to question them. I will continue to do so until this nonsense stops but I doubt that will happen because there's far too many of you around here that apparently get your rocks off indulging in such juvenile behavior.LIPH wrote:Then why respond to them?Jahfin wrote:your comments carry no weight with mePHBeerman wrote:*Switching to captain obvious mode*
I don't know if there is anyone here who doesn't agree that Clear Channel sucks......However, there are only 2 who feel the need to post every article they find to prove this already known fact.
That you're only "playing along for the rant" only proves my point at how infantile all your whining and complaining is.PHBeerman wrote:What was the question? I just play along waiting for the rant.Jahfin wrote: I see your self righteousness got in the way of you answering any of my questions.
To Larry that will be a compliment.Jahfin wrote:Just because his comments don't carry any weight with me doesn't mean I have no right to question them. I will continue to do so until this nonsense stops but I doubt that will happen because there's far too many of you around here that apparently get your rocks off indulging in such juvenile behavior.LIPH wrote:Then why respond to them?Jahfin wrote:your comments carry no weight with mePHBeerman wrote:*Switching to captain obvious mode*
I don't know if there is anyone here who doesn't agree that Clear Channel sucks......However, there are only 2 who feel the need to post every article they find to prove this already known fact.
Why don't you ask that of the likes of PHbeerman? He and others apparently don't like these sort of posts but they somehow manage to find their way into these threads so they can whine about them some more.LIPH wrote:You answered a question I didn't ask. I didn't I say you had no right to question anyone's comments. All I meant was if something means so little to you why don't you just ignore it?Jahfin wrote:Just because his comments don't carry any weight with me doesn't mean I have no right to question them. I will continue to do so until this nonsense stops but I doubt that will happen because there's far too many of you around here that apparently get your rocks off indulging in such juvenile behavior.LIPH wrote:Then why respond to them?Jahfin wrote:your comments carry no weight with mePHBeerman wrote:*Switching to captain obvious mode*
I don't know if there is anyone here who doesn't agree that Clear Channel sucks......However, there are only 2 who feel the need to post every article they find to prove this already known fact.
Because without fail we receive the comic relief we were seeking.Jahfin wrote:LIPH wrote: Why don't you ask that of the likes of PHbeerman? He and others apparently don't like these sort of posts but they somehow manage to find their way into these threads so they can whine about them some more.
But this is fun.sy wrote:Even if we all agree on the Clear Channel issue, and even if it's been mentioned before, can't we just play nicely about it and not bicker?
Keep right on, you're only continuing to prove my point at how immature you are.Jahfin wrote:Because without fail we receive the comic relief we were seeking.LIPH wrote: Why don't you ask that of the likes of PHbeerman? He and others apparently don't like these sort of posts but they somehow manage to find their way into these threads so they can whine about them some more.
I don't recall Troy, or anyone else, saying someone's comments carry no weight with them and then responding to every one of them anyway. I see stuff here that I can respond to but I don't because a lot of it isn't worth the effort it would take to slide the keyboard tray out from under my desk to type something.Jahfin wrote:Why don't you ask that of the likes of PHbeerman? He and others apparently don't like these sort of posts but they somehow manage to find their way into these threads so they can whine about them some more.LIPH wrote:You answered a question I didn't ask. I didn't I say you had no right to question anyone's comments. All I meant was if something means so little to you why don't you just ignore it?Jahfin wrote:Just because his comments don't carry any weight with me doesn't mean I have no right to question them. I will continue to do so until this nonsense stops but I doubt that will happen because there's far too many of you around here that apparently get your rocks off indulging in such juvenile behavior.LIPH wrote:Then why respond to them?Jahfin wrote:your comments carry no weight with mePHBeerman wrote:*Switching to captain obvious mode*
I don't know if there is anyone here who doesn't agree that Clear Channel sucks......However, there are only 2 who feel the need to post every article they find to prove this already known fact.
Hell I'll prove that point with pride.Jahfin wrote:PHBeerman wrote:Keep right on, you're only continuing to prove my point at how immature you are.Jahfin wrote:Because without fail we receive the comic relief we were seeking.LIPH wrote: Why don't you ask that of the likes of PHbeerman? He and others apparently don't like these sort of posts but they somehow manage to find their way into these threads so they can whine about them some more.
You must be blind because he's already said this very thread doesn't interest him but he continues to post anyway.LIPH wrote:I don't recall Troy, or anyone else, saying someone's comments carry no weight with them and then responding to every one of them anyway. I see stuff here that I can respond to but I don't becasue a lot of it isn't worth the effort it would take to slide the keyboard tray out from under my desk to type something.Jahfin wrote:Why don't you ask that of the likes of PHbeerman? He and others apparently don't like these sort of posts but they somehow manage to find their way into these threads so they can whine about them some more.LIPH wrote:You answered a question I didn't ask. I didn't I say you had no right to question anyone's comments. All I meant was if something means so little to you why don't you just ignore it?Jahfin wrote:Just because his comments don't carry any weight with me doesn't mean I have no right to question them. I will continue to do so until this nonsense stops but I doubt that will happen because there's far too many of you around here that apparently get your rocks off indulging in such juvenile behavior.LIPH wrote:Then why respond to them?Jahfin wrote: your comments carry no weight with me
Nope. I was questioning whether he know the definitions ofthe words he was using. Intimidation implies that someone was trying to instill fear - I've yet to see an example of that.Jahfin wrote:If all else fails, pick on someone's spelling, grammar, etc.rednekkPH wrote:Intimidation??? Do you own a dictionary?Parrot Monkey wrote:So many of you say you hate me bringing up the remaster topic but you do it yourselves when you decide to drop intimidation on me. Kind of hypocritical, eh?
"this thread" isn't "your comments". Unless you and a1aara really are the same person.Jahfin wrote:You must be blind because he's already said this very thread doesn't interest him but he continues to post anyway.
*Correction*Jahfin wrote: You must be blind because he's already said this very thread doesn't interest him but he continues to post anyway.
in·tim·i·dateParrot Monkey wrote:Yes, I see it as the clique trying to intimidate me.rednekkPH wrote:
Intimidation??? Do you own a dictionary?
Well, I see attempts, and I stress attempts, for the clique to try to gang up on be and pretend the whole reissue deal is complete crap. When I group of people tries to gang up, I see that as an attempt to instill fear.rednekkPH wrote:Nope. I was questioning whether he know the definitions ofthe words he was using. Intimidation implies that someone was trying to instill fear - I've yet to see an example of that.