Shiloh

mrsmcg · Post by **mrsmcg** » June 6, 2006 6:12 pm

Just saw a picture of the proud parents and baby Shiloh. It will be published in "Hello" (a British magazine I think), and will be on the newstands Thursday, June 8. My daughter found the picture on one of her message boards, and called me in to see it. She's a pretty little girl, and appears to have her mother's lips.

The Lost Manatee · Post by **The Lost Manatee** » June 7, 2006 2:25 pm

She ought to give back those lips because her mother would look terrible without any lips!

green1 · Post by **green1** » June 7, 2006 2:35 pm

Wasn't Shiloh a really bloody battle during the civil war?
Or, was it that book about a dog?

LIPH · Post by **LIPH** » June 7, 2006 2:41 pm

And we should give a $h!t about these 2 attention whores' baby because ... ?

green1 · Post by **green1** » June 7, 2006 2:52 pm

LIPH wrote:And we should give a $h!t about these 2 attention whores' baby because ... ?

Hear, hear. Give that man a drink and let's toaste him.

iuparrothead · Post by **iuparrothead** » June 7, 2006 3:04 pm

mrsmcg wrote:Just saw a picture of the proud parents and baby Shiloh. It will be published in "Hello" (a British magazine I think), and will be on the newstands Thursday, June 8. My daughter found the picture on one of her message boards, and called me in to see it. She's a pretty little girl, and appears to have her mother's lips.

The word right now is that those pics were leaked without approval and/or possibly fakes...

AlbatrossFlyer · Post by **AlbatrossFlyer** » June 7, 2006 3:07 pm

hello is the "official" european publisher and people mag is the "official" us publisher.

Tiki Bar · Post by **Tiki Bar** » June 7, 2006 3:08 pm

iuparrothead wrote:
mrsmcg wrote:Just saw a picture of the proud parents and baby Shiloh. It will be published in "Hello" (a British magazine I think), and will be on the newstands Thursday, June 8. My daughter found the picture on one of her message boards, and called me in to see it. She's a pretty little girl, and appears to have her mother's lips.
The word right now is that those pics were leaked without approval and/or possibly fakes...

I had no idea what this thread was about til I read this... I am so out of touch with the times, but I did see a headline when I signed on.

thegoatgod · Post by **thegoatgod** » June 7, 2006 3:32 pm

I ain't got no idea whats going on.

tjtryon · Post by **tjtryon** » June 7, 2006 3:42 pm

OK, like Goat, I'm completely clueless. Who had a baby?

thebeachbumm33 · Post by **thebeachbumm33** » June 7, 2006 3:51 pm

tjtryon wrote:OK, like Goat, I'm completely clueless. Who had a baby?

I think it's with regard to the "Brangeline" kid, only because it was on the radio this morning on my way back from Pittsburgh

st.somewhere · Post by **st.somewhere** » June 7, 2006 3:59 pm

Here's the alleged photo... Looks like a fake to me!

ToplessRideFL · Post by **ToplessRideFL** » June 7, 2006 4:26 pm

Why do Brad and Angelina always look like they need a bath??

LIPH · Post by **LIPH** » June 7, 2006 4:27 pm

ToplessRideFL wrote:Why do Brad and Angelina always look like they need a bath??

A lot of celebrities look like that.

phjrsaunt · Post by **phjrsaunt** » June 7, 2006 4:29 pm

Tiki Bar wrote:
iuparrothead wrote:
mrsmcg wrote:Just saw a picture of the proud parents and baby Shiloh. It will be published in "Hello" (a British magazine I think), and will be on the newstands Thursday, June 8. My daughter found the picture on one of her message boards, and called me in to see it. She's a pretty little girl, and appears to have her mother's lips.
The word right now is that those pics were leaked without approval and/or possibly fakes...
I had no idea what this thread was about til I read this... I am so out of touch with the times, but I did see a headline when I signed on.

I thought it was going to be about a Beagle.

tikitatas · Post by **tikitatas** » June 7, 2006 4:29 pm

ToplessRideFL wrote:Why do Brad and Angelina always look like they need a bath??

Sorry, I don't see it . . .???

ToplessRideFL · Post by **ToplessRideFL** » June 7, 2006 4:30 pm

LIPH wrote:A lot of celebrities look like that.

You can see I am impressed...

LIPH · Post by **LIPH** » June 7, 2006 4:32 pm

ToplessRideFL wrote:
LIPH wrote:A lot of celebrities look like that.
You can see I am impressed...

And then you have people like Paris Hilton, who although she looks like she has a passing acquaintance with soap and water, still needs to be stripped and dipped like a dog with fleas.

ToplessRideFL · Post by **ToplessRideFL** » June 7, 2006 4:33 pm

tikitatas wrote:
ToplessRideFL wrote:Why do Brad and Angelina always look like they need a bath??
Sorry, I don't see it . . .???

I think its the popular unkept "grunge and tatoos" look ... of which I am not a fan.... just my opinion.

ToplessRideFL · Post by **ToplessRideFL** » June 7, 2006 4:35 pm

LIPH wrote: And then you have people like Paris Hilton, who although she looks like she has a passing acquaintance with soap and water, still needs to be stripped and dipped like a dog with fleas.

Its all those little bottles of Daddy's shampoo.... of course she looks clean....

but then she messes it up by wearing some godawful outfit that cheapens her look... and I dont care how much she paid for it.

BuffettNews.com

Shiloh

Shiloh

Re: Shiloh

Re: Shiloh

Re: Shiloh