I think it is scary you have 462 days in your years!Ragtopnewbie wrote:I think it's scary that we have a President that spent 462 days on vacation in 2001.
I know, I know....MATH SUX!
Moderator: SMLCHNG
"Those who are willing to sacrifice liberty in the name of security deserve neither"...IsleReef wrote:The Democratic party as we know it today is not the same Democratic party from many many years ago. Todays Democrats are to liberal and far left which is a very dangerous thing to be in todays world. They divide our country and show no unity nor respect for it and have brought nothing good to it what so ever!!!! They have made a disgrace of the Whitehouse, show almost zero moral values or integrety, and believe that the government should support them. Hey, you know what? I work my ass off to make what I make while I see some lazy ass bums who know how to play the system and get their handouts and I'm supposed to pay their way? B.S.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Charity begins at home, not at the Whitehouse. There has not been a decent Dem in the Whitehouse since JFK (and I still question that)......... The most important issue today is our defense and fighting the war on terrorism. We can take care of ourselves here with the economy (which is the strongest it has been since B.J. Clinton's last year in office). If you want a safer future and never have to live through September 11th again, by the way you can blame that Jack Ass Clinton for, you need to see through the liberal media, liberal politicians and liberal stupid ass movie and rock stars and keep Bush in office........
Both of whom RETIRED from entertainment once they became involved in Politics.citcat wrote:Uh.....'scuse me....griping because people in entertainment expressing their political views? Have you ever heard of the governor of California? How about Reagan? geesh.
Ahhhnudd still had a movie in the theatre when he was running for gov...CaptainP wrote:Both of whom RETIRED from entertainment once they became involved in Politics.citcat wrote:Uh.....'scuse me....griping because people in entertainment expressing their political views? Have you ever heard of the governor of California? How about Reagan? geesh.
(And please, no comments about politics and entertainment being the same thing...you all know what I meant! Yarrgh.)
But has not acted since he announced his candidacy. (ACTED IN A MOVIE!!)RinglingRingling wrote:Ahhhnudd still had a movie in the theatre when he was running for gov...CaptainP wrote:Both of whom RETIRED from entertainment once they became involved in Politics.citcat wrote:Uh.....'scuse me....griping because people in entertainment expressing their political views? Have you ever heard of the governor of California? How about Reagan? geesh.
(And please, no comments about politics and entertainment being the same thing...you all know what I meant! Yarrgh.)
True.... it used to be the democratic-republican party.IsleReef wrote:The Democratic party as we know it today is not the same Democratic party from many many years ago.
Would love to hear your explanation of what "liberal" means and why it's so dangerous.IsleReef wrote:Todays Democrats are to liberal and far left which is a very dangerous thing to be in todays world.
Reasonable people not jaded by their political affiliation would say the same about BOTH political parties. Ironic that you blame the other side while delivering an acerbic, bitter rant about them - way to show tolerance and to do your part to unite the country.IsleReef wrote:They divide our country and show no unity nor respect for it and have brought nothing good to it what so ever!!!!
Would love to see your factual support for this. The entire democratic party lacks morals and thinks the government should support them?IsleReef wrote:show almost zero moral values or integrety, and believe that the government should support them.
So you and all your friends would personally help those in need in your community so the government doesn't have to since, as you say, charity begins at home? That's awesome!IsleReef wrote:Hey, you know what? I work my ass off to make what I make while I see some lazy ass bums who know how to play the system and get their handouts and I'm supposed to pay their way? B.S.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Charity begins at home, not at the Whitehouse.
So it's the best it's been since Bush has been president? Well, THAT'S a stellar endorsement. Essentially you're saying "It's not as bad as it was the last two years".IsleReef wrote:We can take care of ourselves here with the economy (which is the strongest it has been since B.J. Clinton's last year in office).
Makes me truly understand the depth of your ignorance about current affairs. Do you even REMOTELY understand the root cause of Bin Laden's vendetta against the U.S. and/or have any concept of the larger picture? I didn't think so.IsleReef wrote:If you want a safer future and never have to live through September 11th again, by the way you can blame that Jack Ass Clinton for
Brilliant sentence. Are you even capable of a reasonable discussion or are you so blinded by your vitrolic hate of the other side that you can only rant and sputter partisan generalities and prejudiced stereotypes in any attempt to justfy your adopted dogmatic beliefs?IsleReef wrote:you need to see through the liberal media, liberal politicians and liberal stupid ass movie and rock stars and keep Bush in office........
Gee, I'm sorry that was too far over your head to comprehend and understand........ You are not worth my time.Key Lime Lee wrote:True.... it used to be the democratic-republican party.IsleReef wrote:The Democratic party as we know it today is not the same Democratic party from many many years ago.
Would love to hear your explanation of what "liberal" means and why it's so dangerous.IsleReef wrote:Todays Democrats are to liberal and far left which is a very dangerous thing to be in todays world.
Reasonable people not jaded by their political affiliation would say the same about BOTH political parties. Ironic that you blame the other side while delivering an acerbic, bitter rant about them - way to show tolerance and to do your part to unite the country.IsleReef wrote:They divide our country and show no unity nor respect for it and have brought nothing good to it what so ever!!!!
Would love to see your factual support for this. The entire democratic party lacks morals and thinks the government should support them?IsleReef wrote:show almost zero moral values or integrety, and believe that the government should support them.
So you and all your friends would personally help those in need in your community so the government doesn't have to since, as you say, charity begins at home? That's awesome!IsleReef wrote:Hey, you know what? I work my ass off to make what I make while I see some lazy ass bums who know how to play the system and get their handouts and I'm supposed to pay their way? B.S.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Charity begins at home, not at the Whitehouse.
So it's the best it's been since Bush has been president? Well, THAT'S a stellar endorsement. Essentially you're saying "It's not as bad as it was the last two years".IsleReef wrote:We can take care of ourselves here with the economy (which is the strongest it has been since B.J. Clinton's last year in office).
Makes me truly understand the depth of your ignorance about current affairs. Do you even REMOTELY understand the root cause of Bin Laden's vendetta against the U.S. and/or have any concept of the larger picture? I didn't think so.IsleReef wrote:If you want a safer future and never have to live through September 11th again, by the way you can blame that Jack Ass Clinton for
Brilliant sentence. Are you even capable of a reasonable discussion or are you so blinded by your vitrolic hate of the other side that you can only rant and sputter partisan generalities and prejudiced stereotypes in any attempt to justfy your adopted dogmatic beliefs?IsleReef wrote:you need to see through the liberal media, liberal politicians and liberal stupid ass movie and rock stars and keep Bush in office........
Seriously, I could care less about which side your on, but do you think you could attempt to raise the level of the discussion to at least semi-intelligible?
Yeah, Lee - what were you thinking trying to insert a little thought into this mindless drivel? Shame on you...IsleReef wrote:Gee, I'm sorry that was too far over your head to comprehend and understand........ You are not worth my time.
