Page 6 of 10

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:33 pm
by tommcat327
SuperTrooper wrote:Restricting who votes based on some arbitrary qualification method is a slippery slope away from democracy. I'm sorry that you feel "insulted" that people who aren't involved in politics to your degree get to vote. Since we are human beings, it wouldn't take long for someone to use a position of power to prevent the opposition from voting.
i'm not involved in politics like frank,as a matter of fact i hate politicians for the most part,but i too feel insulted knowing that my vote could be cancelled out by a bunch of idiots who will vote for whoever jesse jackson or farrakahn tells them to.

again,this could all be solved by putting me in charge

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:33 pm
by buffettbride
rednekkPH wrote:Oh well, it was a good debate while it lasted. Since we are gonna start calling names and levelling allegations of bigotry, I'm bowing out here. Sorry, BB - I was enjoying our dialogue - maybe we can continue "over there".
Hey Frankie!!! I do have ta get going as well. Trying to pack for camping this weekend.

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:35 pm
by tommcat327
Coconuts wrote:
Not speaking the language has nothing to do with being lazy or unproductive. These people left their homes and usually their families because they've dreamt of the lives they could make here and the freedoms we take for granted
not here in my area.they've been here for generations and dont speak the language or have jobs.they have no problem driving their escalade down to cash their welfare checks though

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:39 pm
by phtnt
most people give me a hard time because I don't vote. I'm glad you guy's respect my right to not have an opinion on which crooked politician holds office.

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:41 pm
by tommcat327
buffettbride wrote:
Spanish/English simply because of the population in our country is a pleasant mix of both. I think you probably could smash the ATM, but then you might be put in jail with the Mexicans and that would be just horrifying for you, I'm sure.

I can sympathize with your frustration and do see your true point of view, and I have felt frustrated at times because it was difficult to communicate with a gas station clerk or a janitor in my building. But it does not make them bad people or less deserving of an education--and if they are Americans...they should have (and do have) the right to vote.

One thing I have never done is walked the shoes of a teacher or education administration, so unfortunately I can't speak for them.
there are a lot of russians in this area so i dont buy that population issue.the russians just bother to learn our language instead of whining about it.
and we dont have any mexicans here,we just have puerto ricans.the difference is mexicans take our jobs,puerto ricans just take our welfare
and i dont have anything against people who dont speak english,i have a problem with a race that feels they dont need to bother to learn english because everything will be given to them anyway.if you try to talk to me and are making a decent attempt at speaking my language i'll try my hardest to help you out.but when you have parent suing our schools over a decision to teach english class in english i get seriously upset

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:42 pm
by Big Phan
rednekkPH wrote:
buffettbride wrote:What was their chance to learn? A 3rd rate public school where teachers make less than a retail store clerk and student-teacher ratios are almost 40-1? How is that a chance?
I am SO sick of the whining about these kinds of schools. These kids get a sh*tty education because they are more interested in selling crack, getting knocked up at 15 and shooting anyone that looks at them wrong - not because the teachers or the administration doesn't care. Maybe the district could spend more on books and teachers' salaries if they didn't have to hire armed security guards and install metal detectors. The kids turned the schools into what they are.
As a public school educator - thank you, thank you, thank you - for not blaming the plight of school systems on teachers! I don't think I have ever heard anyone in a conversation about the state of schools say (type) that the problems MIGHT be related to shortcomings of others besides the teachers. We have teachers who shouldn't be teaching, I realize that, but the majority of us put our heart and soul into the job. Thanks for making your POV public!

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:42 pm
by Coconuts
Sorry if I offended you Frank, but some of the stuff you're saying is getting really eurocentric, so I thought that might keep you from running towards the alphalpha again.

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:42 pm
by tommcat327
Coconuts wrote:
Let us know if this debate will make you late for your Klan meeting.
i rescheduled it so i have plenty of time today

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:43 pm
by live2ski
Coconuts wrote:Let us know if this debate will make you late for your Klan meeting.
I always love this one. Anyone who does not share my socialist views is a bigoted racist. Classic.

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:44 pm
by tommcat327
phtnt wrote:most people give me a hard time because I don't vote. I'm glad you guy's respect my right to not have an opinion on which crooked politician holds office.
we dont really respect your opinion tim,we just realize it's worthless :P

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:45 pm
by live2ski
Big Phan wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
buffettbride wrote:What was their chance to learn? A 3rd rate public school where teachers make less than a retail store clerk and student-teacher ratios are almost 40-1? How is that a chance?
I am SO sick of the whining about these kinds of schools. These kids get a sh*tty education because they are more interested in selling crack, getting knocked up at 15 and shooting anyone that looks at them wrong - not because the teachers or the administration doesn't care. Maybe the district could spend more on books and teachers' salaries if they didn't have to hire armed security guards and install metal detectors. The kids turned the schools into what they are.
As a public school educator - thank you, thank you, thank you - for not blaming the plight of school systems on teachers! I don't think I have ever heard anyone in a conversation about the state of schools say (type) that the problems MIGHT be related to shortcomings of others besides the teachers. We have teachers who shouldn't be teaching, I realize that, but the majority of us put our heart and soul into the job. Thanks for making your POV public!
My best friend is a public educator. I blame parents more than teachers.

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:46 pm
by tommcat327
live2ski wrote: My best friend is a public educator. I blame parents more than teachers.
just blame "da man",then nothing is your responsibility anymore.not even your own actions

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:51 pm
by SuperTrooper
tommcat327 wrote:
SuperTrooper wrote:Restricting who votes based on some arbitrary qualification method is a slippery slope away from democracy. I'm sorry that you feel "insulted" that people who aren't involved in politics to your degree get to vote. Since we are human beings, it wouldn't take long for someone to use a position of power to prevent the opposition from voting.
i'm not involved in politics like frank,as a matter of fact i hate politicians for the most part,but i too feel insulted knowing that my vote could be cancelled out by a bunch of idiots who will vote for whoever jesse jackson or farrakahn tells them to.

again,this could all be solved by putting me in charge
Your vote isn't "cancelled out". Democracy isn't a zero-sum game, it is the cumulative expression of the will of the people. Your vote is your OPINION and it counts as much as mine. How I arrive at my vote is none of your concern.

Think of it this way: you and LEE vote in the next election. You are both well informed and involved, but you arrive at different choices. Each of your votes stands on its own in the final total. As do the votes of the uninformed on each side of the issue.

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:55 pm
by LIPH
rednekkPH wrote:voting should not be a right, it should be a privilege earned by educating oneself about the issues.
Then you need to amend the Constitution because that's where the RIGHT to vote comes from. How many politicians, who get elected in part because ill-informed people vote for them, would be in favor of that amendment?

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:56 pm
by 12vmanRick
Coconuts wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
RinglingRingling wrote:are you out of your mind? Why not just return to the era of the damn poll tax and literacy tests.

Jeeeez.
Personally, I think the literacy test is a great idea, although not in the racial context it was originally implemented. I'm not comfortable with the future of our country being at least partially decided by people who can't read and comprehend.
I understand where you're coming from, but that's an entirely too slippery slope- I know a lot of very intelligent people who could care less about politics and just vote along party lines. Should they be excluded?
Not sure if you were asking me or not but please don't try to make more of my statement than it was. It's just a thought, kinda like a flat tax with no writeoffs

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:56 pm
by tommcat327
SuperTrooper wrote:Your vote isn't "cancelled out". Democracy isn't a zero-sum game, it is the cumulative expression of the will of the people. Your vote is your OPINION and it counts as much as mine. How I arrive at my vote is none of your concern.

Think of it this way: you and LEE vote in the next election. You are both well informed and involved, but you arrive at different choices. Each of your votes stands on its own in the final total. As do the votes of the uninformed on each side of the issue.
my vote is cancelled out because for every one of me(someone who makes an informed choice) there are 50 idiots that make the vote on who is in the movies,or who al sharpton told them to vote for or whatever.so you could end up with someone in office who no intelligent person put there.that is how i feel my vote gets nullified by stuoid people.
that is totally different than me voting for someone and lee voting for the wrong guy :lol:

Posted: August 13, 2004 1:57 pm
by 12vmanRick
buffettbride wrote:
Coconuts wrote:
What part of "All men are created equal" are you having a problem with?! Not trying to start a fight, but you're scaring me.
<<<I'm a bit askeered myself>>>>

If you think everyone was created equal then you surely have blinders on.. not meaning to be an ass here but come on.. there are many levels of intelligence, money, health.. etc.

Posted: August 13, 2004 2:01 pm
by 12vmanRick
tommcat327 wrote:
buffettbride wrote: What was their chance to learn? A 3rd rate public school where teachers make less than a retail store clerk and student-teacher ratios are almost 40-1? How is that a chance?

I don't think I should be punished because I did not get an equal education to another. I could possibly think about supporting where you are coming from if you can come up with a way to provide equal education to all Americans.
if the schools have ever graduated an underpriveledged kid and even one has gone on to something better than that tells me that it's possible and can be done by others.so saying that because someone lives in the inner city is the reason they cant speak english is just wrong.maybe if those schools taught in ENGLISH they would be able to get a job and make something of themselves.the next town over from here they teach english class in spanish.to make it easier for them to graduate :evil: :evil: :evil:
The biggest problem with the schools is that parents gripe about "it's not fair the test was set up for this race or that race" and teachers get forced to pass kids who can't even read or write and don't show up for class.

Posted: August 13, 2004 2:01 pm
by SuperTrooper
12vmanRick wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Coconuts wrote:
What part of "All men are created equal" are you having a problem with?! Not trying to start a fight, but you're scaring me.
<<<I'm a bit askeered myself>>>>

If you think everyone was created equal then you surely have blinders on.. not meaning to be an ass here but come on.. there are many levels of intelligence, money, health.. etc.
The point the founding fathers were trying to make was the stuff you just listed doesn't matter. As far as rights go we are all entitled to the same, regardless of our position in life. That was a primary point of the Revolution.

Posted: August 13, 2004 2:01 pm
by Coconuts
12vmanRick wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Coconuts wrote:
What part of "All men are created equal" are you having a problem with?! Not trying to start a fight, but you're scaring me.
<<<I'm a bit askeered myself>>>>

If you think everyone was created equal then you surely have blinders on.. not meaning to be an ass here but come on.. there are many levels of intelligence, money, health.. etc.
I totally know that, but from a legal standpoint, we are.