BuffettNews.com

Hey look, it's Kerry's "Band of Brothers"

tommcat327 wrote:

Key Lime Lee wrote:Cocktail, Tomm?

YES PLEASE

PHBeerman wrote:Hey look, it's Kerry's "Band of Brothers"

Key Lime Lee wrote:

PHBeerman wrote:Hey look, it's Kerry's "Band of Brothers"

You Mass. guys sure stick by your man.

PHBeerman wrote:

Key Lime Lee wrote:

PHBeerman wrote:Hey look, it's Kerry's "Band of Brothers"

You Mass. guys sure stick by your man.

Yeah.. that's it.

and this takes this thread full-circle. Bush-leaguers have nothing more to offer for their chimp, er, champion but to go on a full frontal assault on the the challenger. Forget about the message, when you can go kill the messenger. A classic, and proven tactic (Hello? John McCain?)

The current president just finishes speaking to the U.N., a global entity that we once championed, and is met with a resounding silence, no applause whatsoever. He speaks of a march toward freedom and harmony. No applause. He speaks of this not becoming a clash between civilizations (!!) Silence.....

Y'know, you can try to bash Kerry til the sun goes down, but that does not change the fact that you can't simply wrap yourself in the U.S. flag, continually mislead your citizens, pillage your own economy, and expect to receive support from at home or abroad. We have to live in the NOW, we won't be fooled again. Let's deal with the issues, let's move forward...

I would of appreciated it if you read my previous post, (it was hard to miss because i posted it like 8 times accidentally, in which a few of Bush's policies were outlined. Others on this board of written things backing Bush policies. Don't take the postings of a few and say they are written by all Bush backers, once again another unfair statement. People need to look at both there records and the policies they are proposing for the next 4 years. Take from those who you feel is right and vote for that person. The left has bashed Bush and the right has bashed Kerry, a lot of it is just crap and propaganda. Your post just bashed Bush without giving me a reason to vote for Kerry, any of Kerry's proposals, or anything Kerry has done to garner my vote. Alls you gave was meaningless left wing rhetoric and attempted to use a scare tactic and make us beleive that the whole world is going to hate America if Bush is elected again. Just like the right is goign to say if Kerry is elected the terrorists are going to win and continue attacks on our citizens. These are both poor propaganda tactics, neither should be the reasoning for voting for either candidate untill the facts are veiwed.

Lightning Bolt wrote:..and this takes this thread full-circle. Bush-leaguers have nothing more to offer for their chimp, er, champion but to go on a full frontal assault on the the challenger. Forget about the message, when you can go kill the messenger. A classic, and proven tactic (Hello? John McCain?)

The current president just finishes speaking to the U.N., a global entity that we once championed, and is met with a resounding silence, no applause whatsoever. He speaks of a march toward freedom and harmony. No applause. He speaks of this not becoming a clash between civilizations (!!) Silence.....

Y'know, you can try to bash Kerry til the sun goes down, but that does not change the fact that you can't simply wrap yourself in the U.S. flag, continually mislead your citizens, pillage your own economy, and expect to receive support from at home or abroad. We have to live in the NOW, we won't be fooled again. Let's deal with the issues, let's move forward...

WHAT THE HELL MAKES YOU THINK YOU ARE INFORMED ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT I'M PRO BUSH? I AM PERSONALLY ANTI POLITICIAN THANK YOU

Key Lime Lee wrote:

PHBeerman wrote:

Key Lime Lee wrote:

PHBeerman wrote:Hey look, it's Kerry's "Band of Brothers"

You Mass. guys sure stick by your man.

Yeah.. that's it.

Oh yeah. That's right, refer back to previously posted ideological scale.

Key Lime Lee wrote:

tommcat327 wrote:

PHBeerman wrote:

RhumChum wrote:

UAHparrothead wrote:Sometimes I get the feeling that a lot of people (not anyone that I know of on this board) simply don't like Bush because he is a Chirstian and he makes no excuses about his faith or about putting that faith into practice. Just my two cents.

Hello . . . Kerry is a Christian also.

This week. Last week he was Jewish. Who knows next week.

IT DEPENDS WHAT THE POLLS INDICATE HE SHOULD BE

Are we talking about Bush's position on the 9/11 commission again? Or Bush's position on steel tarrifs?

I'M TALKING ABOUT ALL POLITICIANS STANCE ON ANYTHING

PHBeerman wrote: Kerry may represent The Northeast

B******.NOT THIS NORTHEASTERNER

tommcat327 wrote:

PHBeerman wrote: Kerry may represent The Northeast

B******.NOT THIS NORTHEASTERNER

How the hell can you live there?

PHBeerman wrote:

Key Lime Lee wrote:

PHBeerman wrote:Hey look, it's Kerry's "Band of Brothers"

You Mass. guys sure stick by your man.

DAMN YOU TROY!!!

PHBeerman wrote:

Lightning Bolt wrote:

tommcat327 wrote:

PHBeerman wrote:

RhumChum wrote:

UAHparrothead wrote:Sometimes I get the feeling that a lot of people (not anyone that I know of on this board) simply don't like Bush because he is a Chirstian and he makes no excuses about his faith or about putting that faith into practice. Just my two cents.

Hello . . . Kerry is a Christian also.

This week. Last week he was Jewish. Who knows next week.

IT DEPENDS WHAT THE POLLS INDICATE HE SHOULD BE

..and this takes this thread full-circle. Bush-leaguers have nothing more to offer for their chimp, er, champion but to go on a full frontal assault on the the challenger. Forget about the message, when you can go kill the messenger. A classic, and proven tactic (Hello? John McCain?)

The current president just finishes speaking to the U.N., a global entity that we once championed, and is met with a resounding silence, no applause whatsoever. He speaks of a march toward freedom and harmony. No applause. He speaks of this not becoming a clash between civilizations (!!) Silence.....

Y'know, you can try to bash Kerry til the sun goes down, but that does not change the fact that you can't simply wrap yourself in the U.S. flag, continually mislead your citizens, pillage your own economy, and expect to receive support from at home or abroad. We have to live in the NOW, we won't be fooled again. Let's deal with the issues, let's move forward...

This is moving forward. Why is it that Kerry will not speak about his voting record? Why is it that Kerry will not sign form 180? Kerry may represent The Northeast, and Left coast, but he does not represent the rest of our country. These are the issues. Bush's service documents have been released (some are real, some have been manufactured by democratic loyalists) Bush is willing to stand by his leadership record. Kerry wants his 19 years as a senator to be looked passed.

Just the fact that Kerry is a 20-year senator in standing speaks volumes in itself. Sen. Kerry does not really have to try to present a front using his voting record, because it would be apples vs. oranges to try to compare a U.S. Senator's record of service to a state governor's. Speaking of comparing service records, I don't recall seeing where Bush has signed a 180 either? Regardless of CBS's gaffe with documents, it really does not change of issue of Bush's deriliction of duty. The liuetenant's secretary was pretty clear on the fact that while she did generate the documents, their content was accurate.
By the way, it is my opinion that Dan Rather ought to resign.

PHBeerman wrote:

tommcat327 wrote:

PHBeerman wrote: Kerry may represent The Northeast

B******.NOT THIS NORTHEASTERNER

How the hell can you live there?

I HATE IT BUT MY JOB PAYS ME PRETTY DAMN GOOD.

Lightning Bolt wrote:Just the fact that Kerry is a 20-year senator in standing speaks volumes in itself.

The only thing it speaks volumes of is the mindless-sheep mentality that votes Democratic at all cost in this lunatic state .... how else could Kennedy be explained? The man KILLED someone and was re-elected in a landslide!

Lightning Bolt wrote:Just the fact that Kerry is a 20-year senator in standing speaks volumes in itself.

IT DOES?LIKE WHAT?BUSH HAS BEEN IN POLITICS A LONG TIME TOO,IT DOESNT PROVE ANYTHING.
THE ONLY THING IT PROVES IN KERRYS CASE IS THAT HE RUNS FOR SENATE IN A STATE THAT WILL AUTOMATICALLY PUT A DEMOCRAT IN OFFICE REGARDLESS OF HOW USELESS HE IS.TAKE TEDDY FOR EXAMPLE,HE NOT ONLY SHOULD HAVE BEEN VOTED OUT YEARS AGO BUT HE SHOULD HAVE GONE TO JAIL FOR KILLING SOMEONE,BUT THIS IS MASS,WHERE THAT KIND OF STUFF DOESNT MATTER

Lightning Bolt wrote:

PHBeerman wrote:

Lightning Bolt wrote:

tommcat327 wrote:

PHBeerman wrote:

RhumChum wrote: Hello . . . Kerry is a Christian also.

This week. Last week he was Jewish. Who knows next week.

IT DEPENDS WHAT THE POLLS INDICATE HE SHOULD BE

..and this takes this thread full-circle. Bush-leaguers have nothing more to offer for their chimp, er, champion but to go on a full frontal assault on the the challenger. Forget about the message, when you can go kill the messenger. A classic, and proven tactic (Hello? John McCain?)

The current president just finishes speaking to the U.N., a global entity that we once championed, and is met with a resounding silence, no applause whatsoever. He speaks of a march toward freedom and harmony. No applause. He speaks of this not becoming a clash between civilizations (!!) Silence.....

Y'know, you can try to bash Kerry til the sun goes down, but that does not change the fact that you can't simply wrap yourself in the U.S. flag, continually mislead your citizens, pillage your own economy, and expect to receive support from at home or abroad. We have to live in the NOW, we won't be fooled again. Let's deal with the issues, let's move forward...

This is moving forward. Why is it that Kerry will not speak about his voting record? Why is it that Kerry will not sign form 180? Kerry may represent The Northeast, and Left coast, but he does not represent the rest of our country. These are the issues. Bush's service documents have been released (some are real, some have been manufactured by democratic loyalists) Bush is willing to stand by his leadership record. Kerry wants his 19 years as a senator to be looked passed.

Just the fact that Kerry is a 20-year senator in standing speaks volumes in itself. Sen. Kerry does not really have to try to present a front using his voting record, because it would be apples vs. oranges to try to compare a U.S. Senator's record of service to a state governor's. Speaking of comparing service records, I don't recall seeing where Bush has signed a 180 either? Regardless of CBS's gaffe with documents, it really does not change of issue of Bush's deriliction of duty. The liuetenant's secretary was pretty clear on the fact that while she did generate the documents, their content was accurate.
By the way, it is my opinion that Dan Rather ought to resign.

I smell rubber burning,

no wise cracks Beerman

Caribbean Soul wrote: how else could Kennedy be explained? The man KILLED someone and was re-elected in a landslide!

Don't forget Mrs. Bush killed a teenager when she blew through a stop sign.

rednekkPH wrote:

Caribbean Soul wrote: how else could Kennedy be explained? The man KILLED someone and was re-elected in a landslide!

Don't forget Mrs. Bush killed a teenager when she blew through a stop sign.

WAS SHE DRUNK AND LEFT THE SCENE?

True...
1. She's not running for election.
2. She was not stinking DRUNK.
3. She did not flee the scene of the accident.
4. She did the punishment ... which, granted at the time was much less than she would have gotten now, but still it was the law then.

Need I go on????