Posted: March 18, 2005 1:39 pm
Just happened to be watching Wed a.m. Today show when she was introduced.
Impressive young woman, likeable song
Impressive young woman, likeable song

http://www.billboard.com/bb/daily/artic ... 1000853179Billboard wrote: Miranda Lambert comes in at No. 18 with her Epic debut "Kerosene," with sales of 40,000. The set also tops the Billboard Top Country Albums chart, making the 2003 "Nashville Star" finalist the fourth debut female country artist in history to bow in that chart's top slot after Gretchen Wilson, LeAnn Rimes and Wynonna Judd.
LIPH found this; http://www.criticalmention.net/vg/sony/Ilph wrote:Does the Today show have video up on the internet of Miranda's segment? I'm getting her's and Trace Adkin's CDs this week.
But the artists understand this coming in, and are willing to pay that price. So while things might be tough at the beginning, they understand what they're getting into going in. But I agree, it is a crappy way to be treated by a business that they make money for.Key Lime Lee wrote:Sell more copies! Sell more copies!
FourPlay needs a family vacation, so this thing better go platinum....
Oh - and the business sucks.
What the article doesn't point out very clearly is that if it costs $500,000 for the record and the video, Miranda has to pay that out of her $1 per record. Meanwhile the label is making $4 (or so) per record profit. So after 500,000 records sell, Miranda has no money (because the $500,000 is recouped by the label for expenses) and the label has 2.5 mil ($4 x 500,000 plus the $500,000 Miranda paid them back).
It's indentured servitude at best, but it's still the only path to the big time.
Maybe you should invite her over for a little bump and grindragtopW wrote:I love the CD.. Just one thing be careful where you play it
you might get caught dancing while doing housework..
by the hot neighbor![]()
yeah the Co-ed
Well, put more frankly, its the only game in town. If you don't like how its run there's no other option.Ilph wrote:But the artists understand this coming in, and are willing to pay that price. So while things might be tough at the beginning, they understand what they're getting into going in. But I agree, it is a crappy way to be treated by a business that they make money for.Key Lime Lee wrote:Sell more copies! Sell more copies!
FourPlay needs a family vacation, so this thing better go platinum....
Oh - and the business sucks.
What the article doesn't point out very clearly is that if it costs $500,000 for the record and the video, Miranda has to pay that out of her $1 per record. Meanwhile the label is making $4 (or so) per record profit. So after 500,000 records sell, Miranda has no money (because the $500,000 is recouped by the label for expenses) and the label has 2.5 mil ($4 x 500,000 plus the $500,000 Miranda paid them back).
It's indentured servitude at best, but it's still the only path to the big time.
Yeah, paying the Nashville mafia, I mean Nashville machine seems like a much better option than years of one night bar stands and drunks who think they can danceKey Lime Lee wrote:Well, put more frankly, its the only game in town. If you don't like how its run there's no other option.Ilph wrote:But the artists understand this coming in, and are willing to pay that price. So while things might be tough at the beginning, they understand what they're getting into going in. But I agree, it is a crappy way to be treated by a business that they make money for.Key Lime Lee wrote:Sell more copies! Sell more copies!
FourPlay needs a family vacation, so this thing better go platinum....
Oh - and the business sucks.
What the article doesn't point out very clearly is that if it costs $500,000 for the record and the video, Miranda has to pay that out of her $1 per record. Meanwhile the label is making $4 (or so) per record profit. So after 500,000 records sell, Miranda has no money (because the $500,000 is recouped by the label for expenses) and the label has 2.5 mil ($4 x 500,000 plus the $500,000 Miranda paid them back).
It's indentured servitude at best, but it's still the only path to the big time.
Some do and some don't. I've worked with several who thought the day they signed their deal they had made it. The smart ones understand that they will not see any money for quite a while. While it may seem crappy, think about the vast majority that the label doesn't recoup. The label takes all the risk. They (in a way) deserve to see a return on their investment, before the artist makes any real money. Granted, some of that initial spend doesn't always make sense. It's just the way it is. Personally, I prefer the way Clint Black runs his label.Ilph wrote:But the artists understand this coming in, and are willing to pay that price. So while things might be tough at the beginning, they understand what they're getting into going in. But I agree, it is a crappy way to be treated by a business that they make money for.Key Lime Lee wrote:Sell more copies! Sell more copies!
FourPlay needs a family vacation, so this thing better go platinum....
Oh - and the business sucks.
What the article doesn't point out very clearly is that if it costs $500,000 for the record and the video, Miranda has to pay that out of her $1 per record. Meanwhile the label is making $4 (or so) per record profit. So after 500,000 records sell, Miranda has no money (because the $500,000 is recouped by the label for expenses) and the label has 2.5 mil ($4 x 500,000 plus the $500,000 Miranda paid them back).
It's indentured servitude at best, but it's still the only path to the big time.