Posted: June 15, 2005 8:30 pm
THATS US
Thanks Fett !!!!fett wrote:Yeah second that,Jason Mason wrote:I've heard worse!Steele1161 wrote:Is Jimmy in a tunnel. It's very echoeeeee
BTW Happy Birthday, Jason.
PHnSC, too
You should, its well worth it. The sound is crystal clear, and had no interruptions.irishcajunphan wrote:I may be asking Santa Claus for a sirius satellite set up.
Agreed!z-man wrote:That was a great acoustic anthemgingerbreadman wrote:How about we don't count the anthem with a number?Jason Mason wrote:03 Stars On The Water
I think y'all ought to count it as 1)
What do ya think G, should we change it?ladyparrothead wrote:Agreed!z-man wrote:That was a great acoustic anthemgingerbreadman wrote:How about we don't count the anthem with a number?Jason Mason wrote:03 Stars On The Water
I think y'all ought to count it as 1)
Me?phi1097 wrote:going to the Pitt show?
yep on the crystal clearPHnSC wrote:You should, its well worth it. The sound is crystal clear, and had no interruptions.irishcajunphan wrote:I may be asking Santa Claus for a sirius satellite set up.
yeah sorryJason Mason wrote:Me?phi1097 wrote:going to the Pitt show?
So go find yourself a circle to drive on for a few hoursScoman16 wrote:yep on the crystal clearPHnSC wrote:You should, its well worth it. The sound is crystal clear, and had no interruptions.irishcajunphan wrote:I may be asking Santa Claus for a sirius satellite set up.BUT when you go under a bridge in NJ it cuts out just like am radio did in the '70's.
...
Scoman16 wrote:yep on the crystal clearPHnSC wrote:You should, its well worth it. The sound is crystal clear, and had no interruptions.irishcajunphan wrote:I may be asking Santa Claus for a sirius satellite set up.BUT when you go under a bridge in NJ it cuts out just like am radio did in the '70's.
...
Its okay! Actually the only one I can make it to this year is Cincy. Can I assume you're going?phi1097 wrote:yeah sorryJason Mason wrote:Me?phi1097 wrote:going to the Pitt show?
OK - from here onJason Mason wrote:What do ya think G, should we change it?ladyparrothead wrote:Agreed!z-man wrote:That was a great acoustic anthemgingerbreadman wrote:How about we don't count the anthem with a number?Jason Mason wrote:03 Stars On The Water
I think y'all ought to count it as 1)
AGree on the bridge part. I got the home kit to, and it is great.Scoman16 wrote:yep on the crystal clearPHnSC wrote:You should, its well worth it. The sound is crystal clear, and had no interruptions.irishcajunphan wrote:I may be asking Santa Claus for a sirius satellite set up.BUT when you go under a bridge in NJ it cuts out just like am radio did in the '70's.
...
Let's hope so.Quint wrote:Bets on whether or not we will be thrown for another great loop on the encore?