BuffettNews.com

RinglingRingling wrote:

ragtopW wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:while I have a problem with non-family members being at the party and sitting thru the show; were it all a family affair, the defense would be much easier.

And as long as the "underage" kids were not boinking the stripper, the weasels in the photo hut should be waylaid in the parking lot and clubbed like baby harp seals.

We really need to get you to say just what you think
and quit sugarcoating things..

always circumloquacious

Does that hurt your tongue to say it out loud?

Four Play wrote:Do you think she learned her lesson and bought a digital camera?

hai wakarimasuka... and see my post about the a$$munches from the photohut being beaten within an inch of their miserable, misbegotten, sheep-molestin' lives

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

ragtopW wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:while I have a problem with non-family members being at the party and sitting thru the show; were it all a family affair, the defense would be much easier.

And as long as the "underage" kids were not boinking the stripper, the weasels in the photo hut should be waylaid in the parking lot and clubbed like baby harp seals.

We really need to get you to say just what you think
and quit sugarcoating things..

always circumloquacious

Does that hurt your tongue to say it out loud?

circuloquacious? no.

I have found an exercise that keeps my tongue limber and agile for words like that.

RinglingRingling wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

ragtopW wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:while I have a problem with non-family members being at the party and sitting thru the show; were it all a family affair, the defense would be much easier.

And as long as the "underage" kids were not boinking the stripper, the weasels in the photo hut should be waylaid in the parking lot and clubbed like baby harp seals.

We really need to get you to say just what you think
and quit sugarcoating things..

always circumloquacious

Does that hurt your tongue to say it out loud?

circuloquacious? no.

I have found an exercise that keeps my tongue limber and agile for words like that.

Uhhh huh. Keep talking...

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

ragtopW wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:while I have a problem with non-family members being at the party and sitting thru the show; were it all a family affair, the defense would be much easier.

And as long as the "underage" kids were not boinking the stripper, the weasels in the photo hut should be waylaid in the parking lot and clubbed like baby harp seals.

We really need to get you to say just what you think
and quit sugarcoating things..

always circumloquacious

Does that hurt your tongue to say it out loud?

circuloquacious? no.

I have found an exercise that keeps my tongue limber and agile for words like that.

Uhhh huh. Keep talking...

oddly enough darlin', that is part of the exercise.

RinglingRingling wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

ragtopW wrote: We really need to get you to say just what you think
and quit sugarcoating things..

always circumloquacious

Does that hurt your tongue to say it out loud?

circuloquacious? no.

I have found an exercise that keeps my tongue limber and agile for words like that.

Uhhh huh. Keep talking...

oddly enough darlin', that is part of the exercise.

So, do you ummm, talk for distance or speed? Is it the quality of words or quantity?

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote: always circumloquacious

Does that hurt your tongue to say it out loud?

circuloquacious? no.

I have found an exercise that keeps my tongue limber and agile for words like that.

Uhhh huh. Keep talking...

oddly enough darlin', that is part of the exercise.

So, do you ummm, talk for distance or speed? Is it the quality of words or quantity?

Darlin', it's quality, and duration, thos I have been told "you aren't built for speed, just for comfort. ;D"

a1aara wrote:

LIPH wrote:

jonesbeach10 wrote:Good old "Bush family values"

I don't know about the rest of you but I always love to see Hooters open just to p*** off decency groups who push for these laws. Anyone else?

I realize the knee jerk reaction is to pin everything on Bush, but this was in Tennessee, the home of Al and Tipper Gore. In case you don't remember, Tipper was the one who wanted to put warning labels on records and CDs 20 or so years ago. I don't think she's ever been mistaken for a member of the Christian right.

Tennesse went to Bush in both elections.

I'd venture a guess that every state has laws similar to the ones under which this woman was indicted, contributing to the delinquency of a minor and involving a minor in obscene acts. And I'd be willing to bet they were on the books and people have been prosecuted for violating them, since long before Bush was in the White House.

LIPH wrote:

a1aara wrote:

LIPH wrote:

jonesbeach10 wrote:Good old "Bush family values"

I don't know about the rest of you but I always love to see Hooters open just to p*** off decency groups who push for these laws. Anyone else?

I realize the knee jerk reaction is to pin everything on Bush, but this was in Tennessee, the home of Al and Tipper Gore. In case you don't remember, Tipper was the one who wanted to put warning labels on records and CDs 20 or so years ago. I don't think she's ever been mistaken for a member of the Christian right.

Tennesse went to Bush in both elections.

I'd venture a guess that every state has laws similar to the ones under which this woman was indicted, contributing to the delinquency of a minor and involving a minor in obscene acts. And I'd be willing to bet they were on the books and people have been prosecuted for violating them, since long before Bush was in the White House.

I would agree that it has nothing to do with Bush or Tipper, tho both of them could use a real dose of reality and all. Someone hit the nail on the head with the statement, "it's just crap from someone trying to force their version of belief on everyone else"

a1aara wrote: Anette Pharris took photos at the party and tried to have them
developed at a nearby drug store. Drug store employees notified
authorities, police said.

''Who are they to tell me what I can and can't show to my own
children?'' the mother said.

Trailer trash is, as trailer trash done did

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

ragtopW wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:while I have a problem with non-family members being at the party and sitting thru the show; were it all a family affair, the defense would be much easier.

And as long as the "underage" kids were not boinking the stripper, the weasels in the photo hut should be waylaid in the parking lot and clubbed like baby harp seals.

We really need to get you to say just what you think
and quit sugarcoating things..

always circumloquacious

Does that hurt your tongue to say it out loud?

circuloquacious? no.

I have found an exercise that keeps my tongue limber and agile for words like that.

Uhhh huh. Keep talking...

I too am a cunning linguist

Cubbie Bear wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

ragtopW wrote: We really need to get you to say just what you think
and quit sugarcoating things..

always circumloquacious

Does that hurt your tongue to say it out loud?

circuloquacious? no.

I have found an exercise that keeps my tongue limber and agile for words like that.

Uhhh huh. Keep talking...

I too am a cunning linguist

That's what I like to hear.

ph4ever wrote:My ex got my son a stripper for his 18th birthday. It was hilarious!!! The looks on his face. She came in dressed as a cop and she had him believing he was actually talking to a cop - untill she slipped the handcuffs on and had him sit down and turned on the music

Thats hot.