Page 1 of 1
wikipedia's featured article
Posted: July 8, 2005 11:29 am
by DeactiveCarib
For those who don't know, Wikipedia is a pretty well known internet encyclopedia that has information (and sometimes images) on pretty much everything. I went to wikipedia this morning to look up something and everyday on wikipedia, they have a featured article. Today's had an especially innapropriate image (on the home page) that is quite vile and disturbing. This is gross and there has to be something to get this off the website.
here is wikipedia's english homepage:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
that image is just gross. does anyone here know who we can complain to to get that nasty thing off this very popular website??
Posted: July 8, 2005 11:30 am
by DeactiveCarib
oops. . .. can a moderator please move this to the off-topic forum. thanks
Posted: July 8, 2005 11:33 am
by buffettbride
huh? which picture?
Posted: July 8, 2005 11:37 am
by DeactiveCarib
buffettbride wrote:huh? which picture?
oh wow. they allready got rid of it. it must have been some sort of hacker or something that put that picture there. Where you now see David Helvarg's portrait, there was a extremeley vile and gross picture. If you actually want to know what it is, i'll tell you, but its really nasty. It was definitley the most disgusting picture i've ever seen.
Posted: July 8, 2005 11:39 am
by buffettbride
DsilCaribe wrote:buffettbride wrote:huh? which picture?
oh wow. they allready got rid of it. it must have been some sort of hacker or something that put that picture there. Where you now see David Helvarg's portrait, there was a extremeley vile and gross picture. If you actually want to know what it is, i'll tell you, but its really nasty.
Depends on the nastiness...if it's anything involving harm to a child or animal, I most definitely don't. In fact, nope. I don't wanna. If someone that knows me pretty well wants to see it and thinks I won't get all sour about it, then maybe.
Posted: July 8, 2005 11:40 am
by DeactiveCarib
buffettbride wrote:DsilCaribe wrote:buffettbride wrote:huh? which picture?
oh wow. they allready got rid of it. it must have been some sort of hacker or something that put that picture there. Where you now see David Helvarg's portrait, there was a extremeley vile and gross picture. If you actually want to know what it is, i'll tell you, but its really nasty.
Depends on the nastiness...if it's anything involving harm to a child or animal, I most definitely don't. In fact, nope. I don't wanna. If someone that knows me pretty well wants to see it and thinks I won't get all sour about it, then maybe.
it has nothing to do children or animals getting hurt. It's sort of pornographic, except worse
Posted: July 8, 2005 11:42 am
by buffettbride
DsilCaribe wrote:buffettbride wrote:DsilCaribe wrote:buffettbride wrote:huh? which picture?
oh wow. they allready got rid of it. it must have been some sort of hacker or something that put that picture there. Where you now see David Helvarg's portrait, there was a extremeley vile and gross picture. If you actually want to know what it is, i'll tell you, but its really nasty.
Depends on the nastiness...if it's anything involving harm to a child or animal, I most definitely don't. In fact, nope. I don't wanna. If someone that knows me pretty well wants to see it and thinks I won't get all sour about it, then maybe.
it has nothing to do children or animals getting hurt. It's sort of pornographic, except worse
Ooohhhh. OK. I think I'll pass. Thanks anyway. I do love p***, but I gotta draw the line somewhere.
Posted: July 8, 2005 11:43 am
by DeactiveCarib
buffettbride wrote:DsilCaribe wrote:buffettbride wrote:DsilCaribe wrote:buffettbride wrote:huh? which picture?
oh wow. they allready got rid of it. it must have been some sort of hacker or something that put that picture there. Where you now see David Helvarg's portrait, there was a extremeley vile and gross picture. If you actually want to know what it is, i'll tell you, but its really nasty.
Depends on the nastiness...if it's anything involving harm to a child or animal, I most definitely don't. In fact, nope. I don't wanna. If someone that knows me pretty well wants to see it and thinks I won't get all sour about it, then maybe.
it has nothing to do children or animals getting hurt. It's sort of pornographic, except worse
Ooohhhh. OK. I think I'll pass. Thanks anyway. I do love p***, but I gotta draw the line somewhere.
and this was WAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY past the line
Posted: July 8, 2005 11:43 am
by buffettbride
DsilCaribe wrote:buffettbride wrote:DsilCaribe wrote:buffettbride wrote:DsilCaribe wrote:buffettbride wrote:huh? which picture?
oh wow. they allready got rid of it. it must have been some sort of hacker or something that put that picture there. Where you now see David Helvarg's portrait, there was a extremeley vile and gross picture. If you actually want to know what it is, i'll tell you, but its really nasty.
Depends on the nastiness...if it's anything involving harm to a child or animal, I most definitely don't. In fact, nope. I don't wanna. If someone that knows me pretty well wants to see it and thinks I won't get all sour about it, then maybe.
it has nothing to do children or animals getting hurt. It's sort of pornographic, except worse
Ooohhhh. OK. I think I'll pass. Thanks anyway. I do love p***, but I gotta draw the line somewhere.
and this was WAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY past the line
Gotcha.
Posted: July 8, 2005 11:50 am
by DeactiveCarib
note to mods... you can delete this now
Posted: July 8, 2005 11:52 am
by PalmettoSon
buffettbride wrote:DsilCaribe wrote:buffettbride wrote:DsilCaribe wrote:buffettbride wrote:DsilCaribe wrote:
oh wow. they allready got rid of it. it must have been some sort of hacker or something that put that picture there. Where you now see David Helvarg's portrait, there was a extremeley vile and gross picture. If you actually want to know what it is, i'll tell you, but its really nasty.
Depends on the nastiness...if it's anything involving harm to a child or animal, I most definitely don't. In fact, nope. I don't wanna. If someone that knows me pretty well wants to see it and thinks I won't get all sour about it, then maybe.
it has nothing to do children or animals getting hurt. It's sort of pornographic, except worse
Was it the goatse.cx thing? PM me a description, if you don't mind. I don't need to see it, but if I don't know what it is, it'll bug me all day.
Ooohhhh. OK. I think I'll pass. Thanks anyway. I do love p***, but I gotta draw the line somewhere.
and this was WAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY past the line
Gotcha.