I hope Court TV carries this case

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » August 7, 2005 11:00 pm

Court Date Set in Spanking Strippers Case
August 05, 2005 8:24 PM EDT

LITTLE ROCK - A Sept. 15 court date was set Thursday for three women accused of spanking a truck driver too vigorously at his birthday party.

The three - Kelly Eslick, 21, of Jacksonville; Lisa Nolen, 23, of Cabot; and Charlene Smith, 23, of Ward - appeared before Pulaski County District Judge Wayne Gruber to face felony charges of participating in an obscene performanced and misdemeanor charges of third-degree battery.

The three all work at Sensations Night Club in Jacksonville, where customer Keith Lowery of Bald Knob says they went overboard in giving him an onstage spanking paid for by friends of Lowery who were with him at the club for a 31st birthday celebration.

Lowery told sheriff's deputies that he suffered bruises so severe that he was unable to sit comfortably for five days.

The three women were arrested June 17, along with two other employees of the private club, James Daugherty, 31, of Jacksonville, and Dena Mitchell, 30, of Sherwood, after Lowery filed a complaint with police.

After his friends paid $25, Keith Lowery was handcuffed and spanked with a 3-foot-long paddle and a belt while one of the strippers restrained his head with her legs, according to investigators with the Pulaski County sheriff's office.

North Little Rock attorney Jeff Wankum entered innocent pleas Thursday for the defendants.

ragtopW · Post by **ragtopW** » August 8, 2005 12:19 am

I wouldn't press charges on the girls

My "friends??" Run Forest Run..

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » August 8, 2005 8:55 am

Oh for sheesh!!

SweetMelissa · Post by **SweetMelissa** » August 8, 2005 3:47 pm

"where customer Keith Lowery of Bald Knob "

did anyone else find that funny???
Or am I the only immature one here?

Finsupinfla · Post by **Finsupinfla** » August 8, 2005 3:52 pm

SweetMelissa wrote:"where customer Keith Lowery of Bald Knob "

did anyone else find that funny???
Or am I the only immature one here?

Not at all, you just beat me to it!!!

Should I use the word beat when we are talking about Bald Knob?

SweetMelissa · Post by **SweetMelissa** » August 8, 2005 3:59 pm

Finsupinfla wrote:
SweetMelissa wrote:"where customer Keith Lowery of Bald Knob "

did anyone else find that funny???
Or am I the only immature one here?

Not at all, you just beat me to it!!!

Should I use the word beat when we are talking about Bald Knob?

Oh thank god, I was scaring myself.

Deffinitely wouldn't use beat there though buddy!

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » August 8, 2005 4:00 pm

SweetMelissa wrote:
Finsupinfla wrote:
SweetMelissa wrote:"where customer Keith Lowery of Bald Knob "

did anyone else find that funny???
Or am I the only immature one here?

Not at all, you just beat me to it!!!

Should I use the word beat when we are talking about Bald Knob?
Oh thank god, I was scaring myself.

Deffinitely wouldn't use beat there though buddy!

Pervs

SweetMelissa · Post by **SweetMelissa** » August 8, 2005 4:01 pm

buffettbride wrote:
SweetMelissa wrote:
Finsupinfla wrote:
SweetMelissa wrote:"where customer Keith Lowery of Bald Knob "

did anyone else find that funny???
Or am I the only immature one here?

Not at all, you just beat me to it!!!

Should I use the word beat when we are talking about Bald Knob?
Oh thank god, I was scaring myself.

Deffinitely wouldn't use beat there though buddy!
Pervs

You love it

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » August 8, 2005 4:01 pm

SweetMelissa wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
SweetMelissa wrote:
Finsupinfla wrote:
SweetMelissa wrote:"where customer Keith Lowery of Bald Knob "

did anyone else find that funny???
Or am I the only immature one here?

Not at all, you just beat me to it!!!

Should I use the word beat when we are talking about Bald Knob?
Oh thank god, I was scaring myself.

Deffinitely wouldn't use beat there though buddy!
Pervs
You love it

Well, duh!!!

Finsupinfla · Post by **Finsupinfla** » August 8, 2005 4:04 pm

I can't speak for all the men here, but I would be embarrased to file something like this. Can you just imagine the names his friends are calling him? I know some of the ones I would call him!

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » August 8, 2005 4:05 pm

Finsupinfla wrote:I can't speak for all the men here, but I would be embarrased to file something like this. Can you just imagine the names his friends are calling him? I know some of the ones I would call him!

Sounds like they will be calling him "Rich" pretty soon.

Finsupinfla · Post by **Finsupinfla** » August 8, 2005 4:07 pm

buffettbride wrote:
Finsupinfla wrote:I can't speak for all the men here, but I would be embarrased to file something like this. Can you just imagine the names his friends are calling him? I know some of the ones I would call him!
Sounds like they will be calling him "Rich" pretty soon.

If I was on the jury, I would rule in his favor!

I wonder if they paid the extra money to have it taped?

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » August 8, 2005 9:32 pm

Finsupinfla wrote:I can't speak for all the men here, but I would be embarrased to file something like this. Can you just imagine the names his friends are calling him? I know some of the ones I would call him!

Oh God, I would be so embarassed. Never!

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » August 8, 2005 9:32 pm

Finsupinfla wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Finsupinfla wrote:I can't speak for all the men here, but I would be embarrased to file something like this. Can you just imagine the names his friends are calling him? I know some of the ones I would call him!
Sounds like they will be calling him "Rich" pretty soon.

If I was on the jury, I would rule in his favor!

I wonder if they paid the extra money to have it taped?

I would rule for the strippers because he's a pansy.

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » August 8, 2005 9:33 pm

Ilph wrote:
I would rule for the strippers because he's a pansy.

Me too.

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » August 8, 2005 9:49 pm

buffettbride wrote:
Ilph wrote:
I would rule for the strippers because he's a pansy.
Me too.

Pansies beware of the BN jury!

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » August 8, 2005 10:20 pm

Ilph wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Ilph wrote:
I would rule for the strippers because he's a pansy.
Me too.
Pansies beware of the BN jury!

I would call them a far worse "p" name.

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » August 9, 2005 9:20 am

buffettbride wrote:
Ilph wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Ilph wrote:
I would rule for the strippers because he's a pansy.
Me too.
Pansies beware of the BN jury!
I would call them a far worse "p" name.

Yeah, but it would look like this p****

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » August 9, 2005 10:12 am

Ilph wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Ilph wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Ilph wrote:
I would rule for the strippers because he's a pansy.
Me too.
Pansies beware of the BN jury!
I would call them a far worse "p" name.
Yeah, but it would look like this p****