Speaking of bisexuality...

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » September 16, 2005 5:12 pm

Cuervo wrote:
AlbatrossFlyer wrote:ok. i go to lunch and grab a copy of this week's New Times. lo and behold what's the cover story?
Yep... read an article in the Tampa Tribue today about a study that said women-women sexual experiences are up from 4% to 11% in women from 16-30 years old.

'Cause it's fun, it feels good, and it won't make you pregnant.

ToplessRideFL · Post by **ToplessRideFL** » September 16, 2005 5:13 pm

Cubbie Bear wrote:
LIPH wrote:
ToplessRideFL wrote:
LIPH wrote: Because there's a big difference between muff diving and goop gobbling.
LMAO...... on my 3rd try at a response and none seem appropriate.... so I will just leave it at
I'm a lawyer, I make my living with words.
So that makes you a Cunning Linguist

That was one of the 3........

Lastplaneout · Post by **Lastplaneout** » September 16, 2005 5:46 pm

buffettbride wrote:
ToplessRideFL wrote:
buffettbride wrote:I've never really considered myself bisexual...more heteroflexible really.
I like the terms "sometimes socially bi" or "bi casual" or "after a few drinks I could be bi"..... LOL
It's actually one of those things that is completely opportunity driven, but yes, opportunity usually knocks after a beer or twelve.

I have always told people that....you can turn any woman with just some alcohol...i've seen it a million times

tequilatom · Post by **tequilatom** » September 16, 2005 6:05 pm

Lastplaneout wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
ToplessRideFL wrote:
buffettbride wrote:I've never really considered myself bisexual...more heteroflexible really.
I like the terms "sometimes socially bi" or "bi casual" or "after a few drinks I could be bi"..... LOL
It's actually one of those things that is completely opportunity driven, but yes, opportunity usually knocks after a beer or twelve.

I have always told people that....you can turn any woman with just some alcohol...i've seen it a million times

so true.....and for some guys it's a fight or pass out!!!

i guess for women it's exotic.......for 2 guys it's not for me.

OceanCityGirl · Post by **OceanCityGirl** » September 16, 2005 9:10 pm

I don't see why some people feel the need to label it 'trendy' or hip or weird, or whatever. I see it as whatever makes you happy and gives you that warm and fuzzy feeling.

because I work with alot of hs and college kids. There are girls who are truly curious or doing something that seems right to them. But alot of girls do it for the shock factor and because it's kind of an in thing wih them right now. I don't care either way. Do whatever they want. But I wouldn't really call most of those girls ------- or even bi.
For guys there is so much of a stigma associated with it that you will usually only do it if nature is really pulling you that way. Why bring on the hassle for another reason.

creeky · Post by **creeky** » September 16, 2005 9:17 pm

"whatever floats your boat"

But I think it is something people need to keep to themselves...

ie, you dont see married people posting or saying stuff about what action they got the night before ......

I just dont need to read or hear about it .......

kitty · Post by **kitty** » September 16, 2005 11:20 pm

creeky wrote:"whatever floats your boat"

But I think it is something people need to keep to themselves...

ie, you dont see married people posting or saying stuff about what action they got the night before ......

I just dont need to read or hear about it .......

Thank You Creeky!!!

sonofabeach · Post by **sonofabeach** » September 16, 2005 11:27 pm

bisexual?

only on paydays

Lastplaneout · Post by **Lastplaneout** » September 16, 2005 11:45 pm

ALright...whos first to post pictures?

st.somewhere · Post by **st.somewhere** » September 17, 2005 12:44 am

ToplessRideFL wrote:Depends on who you ask I suppose.... but how come sex between 2 bi sexual woman is HOT and sex with 2 men is gross?

(Can I ask that on here?)

Wait a minute... Hold on a sec... Sex between two <i>"hot"</i> bi-sexual supermodels is a beautiful thing. Sex between two bi-sexual women that look like a combination of Paulie from Rocky and Louis Depalma from Taxi is down right repulsive. Do you see what I'm sayin'?

ToplessRideFL · Post by **ToplessRideFL** » September 17, 2005 1:53 am

creeky wrote:you dont see married people posting or saying stuff about what action they got the night before ......

I beg to differ.... and I mean this in the kindest way.... I have seen many posts eluding to hetrosexual couples activities....(yes, I could look for them... but why?) Shoot... I p'rolly am one to say....something like ..."Mr. Topless showered and poured a second cocktail... I am outa here!" Now is that offensive? I meant it that I was gonna go get me some.... and everyone knew it!

And.... not a day goes by that someone on BN doesnt call someone else gay.... why isnt that offensive?

I am also surprised given the way some threads go around here that this one stayed relativly clean.... Kudos BNers!

creeky wrote:I just dont need to read or hear about it .......

The title of this thread was pretty obvious.... My rule of thumb is this:
If I am offended by a title of a thread...or think I might not want to get involved in the conversation.... I DON'T read it! Now I may read it 'cause I am nosy.... but I was warned and I wouldnt comment on it!

I am a married gal....whether or not I condone bisexuality is not the issue... I am just saying that people have a right to discuss it, live it or choose not to.

There is no offense intended here.... And EVERYONE has the right to post an opinion.... I just pointed out that we cannot have a double standard and exercise our censorship when it fits our personal feelings. On this board...only the moderators can.

Lastplaneout · Post by **Lastplaneout** » September 17, 2005 2:01 am

ragtopW · Post by **ragtopW** » September 17, 2005 2:36 am

Lastplaneout wrote:

MMMM I'm in love!!!!!

creeky · Post by **creeky** » September 17, 2005 3:54 am

ToplessRideFL wrote:
creeky wrote:you dont see married people posting or saying stuff about what action they got the night before ......

I beg to differ.... and I mean this in the kindest way.... I have seen many posts eluding to hetrosexual couples activities....(yes, I could look for them... but why?) Shoot... I p'rolly am one to say....something like ..."Mr. Topless showered and poured a second cocktail... I am outa here!" Now is that offensive? I meant it that I was gonna go get me some.... and everyone knew it!

And.... not a day goes by that someone on BN doesnt call someone else gay.... why isnt that offensive?

I am also surprised given the way some threads go around here that this one stayed relativly clean.... Kudos BNers!

creeky wrote:I just dont need to read or hear about it .......
The title of this thread was pretty obvious.... My rule of thumb is this:
If I am offended by a title of a thread...or think I might not want to get involved in the conversation.... I DON'T read it! Now I may read it 'cause I am nosy.... but I was warned and I wouldnt comment on it!

I am a married gal....whether or not I condone bisexuality is not the issue... I am just saying that people have a right to discuss it, live it or choose not to.

There is no offense intended here.... And EVERYONE has the right to post an opinion.... I just pointed out that we cannot have a double standard and exercise our censorship when it fits our personal feelings. On this board...only the moderators can.

No offence taken ... and I am not offended by the posts - I am rather broad minded - 10 years in the military took care of that

I guess it amuses me that people would put such personal information out there - and in a rather tacky way.

I dont have an issue with people saying they are "going to get some" in a roundabout way like you do - I just sometimes see stuff in threads that are titled something else (not this one) that I wander in to - and think - why do I have to read that in here?? And I know I am not alone on this .... there is a difference to being "suggestive" to being totally "tacky" - I guess I am the only one speaking up on it.

I came in to this thread, fully aware of what it was about .....

and that being said - your question about the women being ok but to watch gay men it is not - I posed that same question to my Army guys when they organised a "show" one night - with two paid female performers (not that I would want to see) - and banned the FEMALE army members from the Mess

- I was ropable!!! So I asked them to make it equal and get two guys in to do a show (ick to that as well)
and they responded to "that is just gross Jenny"

I think it's funny anyway

(If I made any sense!)

Sidew13 · Post by **Sidew13** » September 17, 2005 4:55 am

aeroparrot · Post by **aeroparrot** » September 17, 2005 6:41 am

land_shark3 wrote:Hmmmm, I wonder where I can find some of these "experimental" women?

Dupont Circle in DC.

sonofabeach · Post by **sonofabeach** » September 17, 2005 10:33 am

one for the ladies

ragtopW · Post by **ragtopW** » September 17, 2005 12:00 pm

creeky wrote: - I was ropable!!!

Jenny I have not heard that term since 1977

When I was Living in Hawaii one of my friends was from Down Under

and he used to say that..

Thanks for the Memory!!!

citcat · Post by **citcat** » September 17, 2005 12:48 pm

sonofabeach wrote:one for the ladies

EWWW.

Are you bi if you let Buffettbride hump your leg?

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » September 17, 2005 2:35 pm

citcat wrote:
sonofabeach wrote:one for the ladies

EWWW.

Are you bi if you let Buffettbride hump your leg?

You did NOT just type that out loud, did you???

The answer would be "no" to your question though. It'd mean you were cool!