BuffettNews.com

popcornjack wrote:

drunkpirate66 wrote:

popcornjack wrote:

LIPH wrote:

popcornjack wrote:C'mon, you knew it was going to be no one but Brady. The QB is the "glamour" position, and voters will see all the receivers for the pats making those plays, and they will look at the common denominator: The guy getting them the ball.

Brady already won 3 Super Bowls without big time receivers but he never had a year like this before. Does anybody honestly think he would have thrown 50 TD passes if Moss wasn't on that team? I'm not saying Moss should have been the MVP, but his name has to be in the conversation.

No way he would have.

Which is a worthless stat . . . like going 16 - 0. Without Moss, however, Brady would've been competing for a Super Bowl which he is pretty darn good at if you hadn't noticed with your view blocked by Romo's INT total.

Yeah, but INT stats are about as telling as TD stats. last time I checked, both teams were number one seeds in their conferences.

Doi!

aeroparrot wrote:

SMLCHNG wrote:

I'm an Altered Boy wrote: I guess now I have to root for the Pats.

Say it isn't so, ((((Timmah!!))))

Never underestimate the power of the dark side.

It scares me! Some of their fans are butt munchers but there is no denying what a good team they are.

drunkpirate66 wrote:Some MVP Research . . . (actually I just glanced at today's Boston Globe)



Every MVP in the NFL since 1970 has been a Quarter Back or a Running Back . . . except for three . . .

1. 1986: Laurence Taylor (LB)
2. 1982: Mark Mosely (PK)
3. 1971: Alan Page:(DT)

Since 1970!

No way that for 34 of the last 37 years the MOST VALUABLE PLAYER IN THE NFL IS A QB OR AN RB!

Just goes to show how tainted voting is with fantasy type stats like big power numbers in the MLB.

Sad.

Well, I agree, if you are saying that the MVP is solely based on the "pretty boy" mentality.

I'm an Altered Boy wrote:

aeroparrot wrote:

SMLCHNG wrote:

I'm an Altered Boy wrote: I guess now I have to root for the Pats.

Say it isn't so, ((((Timmah!!))))

Never underestimate the power of the dark side.

It scares me! Some of their fans are butt munchers but there is no denying what a good team they are.

HEY!!! butt munching is legal now in Massachusetts . . . check your facts!

drunkpirate66 wrote:

I'm an Altered Boy wrote:

aeroparrot wrote:

SMLCHNG wrote:

I'm an Altered Boy wrote: I guess now I have to root for the Pats.

Say it isn't so, ((((Timmah!!))))

Never underestimate the power of the dark side.

It scares me! Some of their fans are butt munchers but there is no denying what a good team they are.

HEY!!! butt munching is legal now in Massachusetts . . . check your facts!

I didn't say it like it's a bad thing

I'm an Altered Boy wrote:

drunkpirate66 wrote:

I'm an Altered Boy wrote:

aeroparrot wrote:

SMLCHNG wrote:

I'm an Altered Boy wrote: I guess now I have to root for the Pats.

Say it isn't so, ((((Timmah!!))))

Never underestimate the power of the dark side.

It scares me! Some of their fans are butt munchers but there is no denying what a good team they are.

HEY!!! butt munching is legal now in Massachusetts . . . check your facts!

I didn't say it like it's a bad thing

not so much a bad thing as it leaves you sort of itching the next day . . .

drunkpirate66 wrote:

I'm an Altered Boy wrote:

drunkpirate66 wrote:

I'm an Altered Boy wrote:

aeroparrot wrote:

SMLCHNG wrote: Say it isn't so, ((((Timmah!!))))

Never underestimate the power of the dark side.

It scares me! Some of their fans are butt munchers but there is no denying what a good team they are.

HEY!!! butt munching is legal now in Massachusetts . . . check your facts!

I didn't say it like it's a bad thing

not so much a bad thing as it leaves you sort of itching the next day . . .

and a bad taste in your mouth...













I'm just assuming

WOOOO HOOOOOO GIANTS!!!!!!!!!!!!

flipflopgirl wrote:WOOOO HOOOOOO GIANTS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Giants are larger than normal mortals.

I'm an Altered Boy wrote:

flipflopgirl wrote:WOOOO HOOOOOO GIANTS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Giants are larger than normal mortals.

Thanks Timmy!

flipflopgirl wrote:

I'm an Altered Boy wrote:

flipflopgirl wrote:WOOOO HOOOOOO GIANTS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Giants are larger than normal mortals.

Thanks Timmy!

no problem! glad I could help!

I'm an Altered Boy wrote:

flipflopgirl wrote:

I'm an Altered Boy wrote:

flipflopgirl wrote:WOOOO HOOOOOO GIANTS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Giants are larger than normal mortals.

Thanks Timmy!

no problem! glad I could help!

What a guy!

If anyone still doubts that the Pats pursuit of perfection has expanded interest outside the usual sports fans...

I had lunch today with my 70 year old aunt, who's a nun, and her BFF, Sr. Lucille. Neither one cares about football or sports in general, but they both watched the NE-giants game and we had a rather amazing discussion about whether NY should have rested its regulars before the playoffs. They knew NE's accomplishment was something special and probably wouldn't happen again in their lifetimes. They work at a local college and like to keep up interesting conversations with the students. She never ceases to amaze me!

SuperTrooper wrote:If anyone still doubts that the Pats pursuit of perfection has expanded interest outside the usual sports fans...

I had lunch today with my 70 year old aunt, who's a nun, and her BFF, Sr. Lucille. Neither one cares about football or sports in general, but they both watched the NE-giants game and we had a rather amazing discussion about whether NY should have rested its regulars before the playoffs. They knew NE's accomplishment was something special and probably wouldn't happen again in their lifetimes. They work at a local college and like to keep up interesting conversations with the students. She never ceases to amaze me!

Sorry . . . just a funny image of a 70 year old nun using the phrase BFF.

Sort of cute.

Looks like the Redskins are interested in Lance Briggs.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 02212.html

In a correction to a previous post, the one I had for the SF linebacker as defensive player of the year, as noted before, should have been noted as rookie. Saunders of the Colts is the defensive player of the year.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/f ... index.html

If anyone is interested in Super Bowl squares send me a PM!

Joe Gibbs is retiring from being the coach and president of the Redskins.

http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=33853

aeroparrot wrote:Joe Gibbs is retiring from being the coach and president of the Redskins.

http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=33853

A bit of a surprise, but maybe not a bad decision on his part.

His final career totals: 171-101, including 17-7 in the playoffs, a career .629 winning percentage that ranks third all-time behind George Halas and Don Shula among coaches with more than 125 wins.

Apparently, to this guy on ESPN.com, he thinks that the Pats won't win the Super Bowl because of Tom Brady. He states that no qb that has won the passing title, has ever taken his team to win the Super Bowl.

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/st ... ortCat=nfl