Posted: October 2, 2007 1:01 pm
phjrsaunt wrote:Gummi bears are fun to squish.
Personally I prefer sour patch kids...
Jimmy Buffett discussion
http://www.buffettnews.com/forum/
phjrsaunt wrote:Gummi bears are fun to squish.
In another attempt to get this going elsewheresunseeker wrote:phjrsaunt wrote:Gummi bears are fun to squish.
Personally I prefer sour patch kids...
Now if Steve had a sister named Ada .....popcornjack wrote:This is one of the funniest threads I've read in a long time. And I suggest that the author read "Candyfreak" by Steve Almond. (No joke--that's his last name.)
Geeeez just trying to have some fun . . . why not just take a ruler to my knuckles?thebeachbumm33 wrote:The Catholic Church has never had a problem with "evolution" (as opposed to philosophical Darwinism, which sees man solely as the product of materialist forces). Unlike Luther and Calvin and modern fundamentalists, the Church has never taught that the first chapter of Genesis is meant to teach science.mjeischen wrote:The catholic church does not identify Darwin so we may choose to leave him out of this study for conversations sake as the catholic church is 100% accurate on all it is involved with.jonesbeach10 wrote:Except if we're applying Darwin to M&Ms, wouldn't the M&Ms evolve to the point that they're so hard, they become mini-chocolate jawbreakers?