"sunseeker wrote:
palmettopirate wrote:
The term wrigleyville keeps coming up in my searches.
I'm also interested in comments from sailingagain, ZeroDuval, pirate@43, and ragtopW.
interested as in you think they are mr. buffett??
I can say I have met all four of those nice gentleman and they are not Mr. Buffett "
I got a very interesting email in regard to some questions I posed to James W. Buffett in 2 earlier posts. I'm just gonna back oughta here for a bit. Nuff said for right now.
Every day you wake up you get another chance to do it right.
On a promise, no. At least not right now. Probably said too much already.
There are some very smart folks out there so I can't be sure of anything. And I don't want to spoil anybody else's fun. And again, a promise is a promise.
Every day you wake up you get another chance to do it right.
palmettopirate wrote:On a promise, no. At least not right now. Probably said too much already.
There are some very smart folks out there so I can't be sure of anything. And I don't want to spoil anybody else's fun. And again, a promise is a promise.
Not even if I say PLEASE. Psst. Psst. See the little pm button below?
Enjoy the fun.
SharkOnLand wrote:Jimmy's too busy on Kenny Chesney message boards to bother hanging out here....
for real??
that whole, "Pick a board you have no interest in, create a log in, and ask lots of stupid questions about subjects you pretend to care about"..
Ahh, I guess I don't pretent too often.
Don't mind Ringling. he's harmless, he just hasn't had his shots in a while. he was trying a little cross-thread humor, but that's to be expected. he's often trying.
Take me for what I am, a star newly emerging.
I accept the new found man, and I set the twilight reeling.
"and sacrifice the attention that came after getting shot down on the idea of 4 old-timers being Jimmy? surely you jest."
Sorry. I assume you think my motives are less than honorable. They're certainly not for attention. Didn't mean to cause a stir. But a bigger issue to me would be to post some unreliable info. I'm trying to validate something and if I'm successful I shall post accordingly. Apologies for posting too quickly.
Every day you wake up you get another chance to do it right.
If you have or obtain information that you think is definitive that's great. But here's something to think about: If you are correct and "out" JB here, you think he's gonna keep coming around? If he wanted people to know who he was, it'd be up to him to say "Hey it's me." (Of course in this cynical day and age, I doubt many people would believe it's him--"We just pants Wade Boggs"[Bonus points if anyone gets that. But enough of this digression]) If he wants to maintain his anonymity here, I certainly think he's got that right. It's your information to do with what you want, but for me part of the fun is wondering just what he reads/hears about from here.
Take me for what I am, a star newly emerging.
I accept the new found man, and I set the twilight reeling.
popcornjack wrote:If you have or obtain information that you think is definitive that's great. But here's something to think about: If you are correct and "out" JB here, you think he's gonna keep coming around? If he wanted people to know who he was, it'd be up to him to say "Hey it's me." (Of course in this cynical day and age, I doubt many people would believe it's him--"We just pants Wade Boggs"[Bonus points if anyone gets that. But enough of this digression]) If he wants to maintain his anonymity here, I certainly think he's got that right. It's your information to do with what you want, but for me part of the fun is wondering just what he reads/hears about from here.
How about a member here with the screen name Jimmy Buffett? Any of those?
palmettopirate wrote:"and sacrifice the attention that came after getting shot down on the idea of 4 old-timers being Jimmy? surely you jest."
Sorry. I assume you think my motives are less than honorable. They're certainly not for attention. Didn't mean to cause a stir. But a bigger issue to me would be to post some unreliable info. I'm trying to validate something and if I'm successful I shall post accordingly. Apologies for posting too quickly.
actually, I'd really rather not know. I am pretty sure that Bernd isn't Jimmy. But... Like Jack said, "you spill the beans, you scare him off". and posting, "I got info, but I promised to keep it quiet" is kinda like "I got a seeeeee-KRIT!!!".
it really isn't anything other than an intellectual exercise for your powers of deduction. In speaking for myself, I have to say, don't screw it up for everyone.
palmettopirate wrote:"and sacrifice the attention that came after getting shot down on the idea of 4 old-timers being Jimmy? surely you jest."
Sorry. I assume you think my motives are less than honorable. They're certainly not for attention. Didn't mean to cause a stir. But a bigger issue to me would be to post some unreliable info. I'm trying to validate something and if I'm successful I shall post accordingly. Apologies for posting too quickly.
actually, I'd really rather not know. I am pretty sure that Bernd isn't Jimmy. But... Like Jack said, "you spill the beans, you scare him off". and posting, "I got info, but I promised to keep it quiet" is kinda like "I got a seeeeee-KRIT!!!".
it really isn't anything other than an intellectual exercise for your powers of deduction. In speaking for myself, I have to say, don't screw it up for everyone.
COULDN'T HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF. IF JIMMY'S OUT THERE READING THIS...WE LOVE YOU KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK SEE YOU AT A COUPLE SHOWS THIS YEAR AND KEEP READING THESE POSTS, LAUGHING AT WHAT US JACK@$$'S ARE POSTING.
~Dave~
"These Moments We're Left With, May You Always Remember, These Moments are Shared by Few"
"it really isn't anything other than an intellectual exercise for your powers of deduction. In speaking for myself, I have to say, don't screw it up for everyone."
Agreed. Not my intention. That's why I mentioned a few post ago that I didn't want to interfere with someone else's fun.
Every day you wake up you get another chance to do it right.
