Well, this partially makes up for their asinine ruling the other day which disallowed the death penalty for child rapists.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/26/scotus.guns/index.html
Supreme Court Rules DC Handgun Ban Unconstitutional
Moderator: SMLCHNG
Re: Supreme Court Rules DC Handgun Ban Unconstitutional
Here's a weird spin for you. I agree that the ruling on the death penalty was bad and I am opposed to the death penalty. I see that ruling as one of those legislating from the bench things. It is a state's right to determine punishment for a state crime. The court has determined that the death penalty is not cruel and inhumane for murder so the cruel and inhumane argument doesn't hold water for me.rednekkPH wrote:Well, this partially makes up for their asinine ruling the other day which disallowed the death penalty for child rapists.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/26/scotus.guns/index.html
I do look forward to the day that there is no death penalty through legislation, but the courts nipping away at it isn't the way to stop it.
Rub yours on me and I'll rub mine on you
-
phjrsaunt
- Social Buffettfly

- Posts: 37094
- Joined: October 19, 2001 8:00 pm
- Favorite Buffett Song: Defying Gravity
- Number of Concerts: 21
- Favorite Boat Drink: coconut rum and...anything!
- Location: Lovin' the NOW!
Re: Supreme Court Rules DC Handgun Ban Unconstitutional
I look forward to the day when there's no NEED for a death penalty. But I am, admittedly, a dreamer.Skibo wrote:Here's a weird spin for you. I agree that the ruling on the death penalty was bad and I am opposed to the death penalty. I see that ruling as one of those legislating from the bench things. It is a state's right to determine punishment for a state crime. The court has determined that the death penalty is not cruel and inhumane for murder so the cruel and inhumane argument doesn't hold water for me.rednekkPH wrote:Well, this partially makes up for their asinine ruling the other day which disallowed the death penalty for child rapists.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/26/scotus.guns/index.html
I do look forward to the day that there is no death penalty through legislation, but the courts nipping away at it isn't the way to stop it.
-
buffettbride
- Last Man Standing
- Posts: 32700
- Joined: April 6, 2004 11:43 am
- Number of Concerts: 5
- Favorite Boat Drink: Cuba Libre
Re: Supreme Court Rules DC Handgun Ban Unconstitutional
There's no NEED for a death penalty now because there is no way to guarantee that every person who is put to death for *crimes deemed punishable by death* is in fact, guilty of that crime.phjrsaunt wrote:I look forward to the day when there's no NEED for a death penalty. But I am, admittedly, a dreamer.Skibo wrote:Here's a weird spin for you. I agree that the ruling on the death penalty was bad and I am opposed to the death penalty. I see that ruling as one of those legislating from the bench things. It is a state's right to determine punishment for a state crime. The court has determined that the death penalty is not cruel and inhumane for murder so the cruel and inhumane argument doesn't hold water for me.rednekkPH wrote:Well, this partially makes up for their asinine ruling the other day which disallowed the death penalty for child rapists.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/26/scotus.guns/index.html
I do look forward to the day that there is no death penalty through legislation, but the courts nipping away at it isn't the way to stop it.
Aren't Christians supposed to leave that decision up to God?
Oh dear. I should stop.

Re: Supreme Court Rules DC Handgun Ban Unconstitutional
I agree with this. And as BB said, there are too many people sitting on death row who didn't commit the crime. Life in prison without parole is fine with me.Skibo wrote:I do look forward to the day that there is no death penalty . . .
-
Staredge
- License to Chill
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: February 24, 2007 11:52 pm
- Favorite Buffett Song: King of Somewhere Hot
- Number of Concerts: 12
- Favorite Boat Drink: Mai Tai
- Location: Stuck in the Doldrums...waiting on a breeze.
But how many have died??? Sitting on death row is still breathing. It takes 20 years to kill someone. The amount of people who are finally found innocent and released is proof that the system may not be as screwed up as people think.
And yes, Christians are supposed to leave judgement up to God.
Flip answer: we're just hastening that judgement
Serious answer: the death penalty has historically been accepted by the church in cases where the continued existence of a person committing heinous crimes poses a continued serious threat to the community. The debate as to life without parole removing said threat remains, and I ain't going there.
However........Kennedy needed killing. (the LA guy, not hizzoner)
And yes, Christians are supposed to leave judgement up to God.
Flip answer: we're just hastening that judgement
Serious answer: the death penalty has historically been accepted by the church in cases where the continued existence of a person committing heinous crimes poses a continued serious threat to the community. The debate as to life without parole removing said threat remains, and I ain't going there.
However........Kennedy needed killing. (the LA guy, not hizzoner)
Will
-
Wino you know
- God's Own Drunk
- Posts: 21467
- Joined: February 5, 2002 7:00 pm
- Favorite Buffett Song: Far Side of the World & Somewhere Over China
- Number of Concerts: 105
- Favorite Boat Drink: Beaujalais Villages French Burgundy
- Location: Plowin' straight ahead, come what may
Perhaps, but I know that the faith I follow has said consistently that the death penalty is not the answer. I have not always agreed with that stance, and I am still struggling with it. But I am moving away from my belief in capital punishment.Staredge wrote:Serious answer: the death penalty has historically been accepted by the church in cases where the continued existence of a person committing heinous crimes poses a continued serious threat to the community.



