McCain's VP Is Rumored To Be ...

ejr · Post by **ejr** » September 14, 2008 10:15 am

East Texas Parrothead wrote:New York Times piece ... I hold to my first statement ... they did not vet her enough ... There's more coming out every day ... abuse of power ... personal vendettas ... she didn't really go to Iraq like she said ... and refusing to release records ... maybe these things don't matter to the faithful, but will it play in Peoria?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/po ... ei=5087%0A

I agree, though from what I have heard and read, it was an Alaskan aide to Palin who said that Palin had been to Iraq, not Palin.

Martonian · Post by **Martonian** » September 14, 2008 10:34 am

chippewa wrote:Anybody catch SNL last night? I turned it on to see Michael Phelps, but the opening was a Hilary/Palin skit. Tina Fey absolutely had Palin down perfectly, especially the accent. But after the first five minutes, the rest of that show was pretty much unwatchable. A chuckle or two during Weekend Update, but the skits were terrible. Wow, I hadn't seen the show in quite awhile, now I remember why.

Yea the opening was very funny. I agree with you about Fey... the accent was perfect, and the mannerisms too. But yea, the rest of the show sucked. Phelps wasn't very good. They really let me down. I can't believe they didn't have a single skit with Obama and McCain. Maybe they had one planned before the real Obama canceled his performance.

I still think they will have some great moments this fall, especially with the debates.

Did any of you see MadTV? The guy impersonating Obama was spot on.

Martonian · Post by **Martonian** » September 14, 2008 10:46 am

You can watch the Palin/Hillary SNL skit here:

http://blog.indecision2008.com/2008/09/ ... lirg-card/

Martonian · Post by **Martonian** » September 15, 2008 9:05 pm

Apparently it's now off-limits to satirize Sarah Palin on SNL:

Carly Fiorina, spokeswoman for McCain, had this to say today:

"Well, I think that she looked a bit like her. I think that, of course, the portrait was very dismissive of the substance of Sarah Palin, and so in that sense, they were defining Hillary Clinton as very substantive, and Sarah Palin as totally superficial.

"I think that continues the line of argument that is disrespectful in the extreme, and yes, I would say, sexist in the sense that just because Sarah Palin has different views than Hillary Clinton does not mean that she lacks substance. She has a lot of substance."

Tequila Revenge · Post by **Tequila Revenge** » September 15, 2008 9:24 pm

Martonian wrote:Apparently it's now off-limits to satirize Sarah Palin on SNL:

Carly Fiorina, spokeswoman for McCain, had this to say today:

"Well, I think that she looked a bit like her. I think that, of course, the portrait was very dismissive of the substance of Sarah Palin, and so in that sense, they were defining Hillary Clinton as very substantive, and Sarah Palin as totally superficial.

"I think that continues the line of argument that is disrespectful in the extreme, and yes, I would say, sexist in the sense that just because Sarah Palin has different views than Hillary Clinton does not mean that she lacks substance. She has a lot of substance.":roll:

What ever happened to the SNL "Obama-gasm" skit they did a few months back? NBC pulled it off the web because it portrayed the unfair treatment Obama was getting compaired to Hillary. I'd LOVE to see that again. It was funnier than hell.

Just figure it out- there is a biased media in America. Pretty simple.

East Texas Parrothead · September 15, 2008 9:24 pm

Martonian wrote:Apparently it's now off-limits to satirize Sarah Palin on SNL:

Carly Fiorina, spokeswoman for McCain, had this to say today:

"Well, I think that she looked a bit like her. I think that, of course, the portrait was very dismissive of the substance of Sarah Palin, and so in that sense, they were defining Hillary Clinton as very substantive, and Sarah Palin as totally superficial.

"I think that continues the line of argument that is disrespectful in the extreme, and yes, I would say, sexist in the sense that just because Sarah Palin has different views than Hillary Clinton does not mean that she lacks substance. She has a lot of substance."

Where was Fiorina when they were spoofing Hillary? They've been goofing on her for years. Want some cheese with that whine?

Martonian · Post by **Martonian** » September 15, 2008 9:40 pm

Tequila Revenge wrote:
Martonian wrote:Apparently it's now off-limits to satirize Sarah Palin on SNL:

Carly Fiorina, spokeswoman for McCain, had this to say today:

"Well, I think that she looked a bit like her. I think that, of course, the portrait was very dismissive of the substance of Sarah Palin, and so in that sense, they were defining Hillary Clinton as very substantive, and Sarah Palin as totally superficial.

"I think that continues the line of argument that is disrespectful in the extreme, and yes, I would say, sexist in the sense that just because Sarah Palin has different views than Hillary Clinton does not mean that she lacks substance. She has a lot of substance.":roll:
What ever happened to the SNL "Obama-gasm" skit they did a few months back? NBC pulled it off the web because it portrayed the unfair treatment Obama was getting compaired to Hillary. I'd LOVE to see that again. It was funnier than hell.

Just figure it out- there is a biased media in America. Pretty simple.

What's the Obama-Gasm skit? The CNN Dem primary debate?