Page 1 of 2

Govt. officials investigated over illicit sex, gifts

Posted: September 10, 2008 5:17 pm
by Joetown Parrothead
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington ... -oil_N.htm

WASHINGTON (AP) — Government officials handling billions of dollars in oil royalties improperly engaged in sex with employees of energy companies they were dealing with and received numerous gifts from them, federal investigators said Wednesday.
The alleged transgressions involve 13 former and current Interior Department employees in Denver and Washington. Their alleged improprieties include rigging contracts, working part-time as private oil consultants, and having sexual relationships with — and accepting golf and ski trips and dinners from — oil company employees, according to three reports released Wednesday by the Interior Department's inspector general.

The investigations reveal a "culture of substance abuse and promiscuity" by a small group of individuals "wholly lacking in acceptance of or adherence to government ethical standards," wrote Inspector General Earl E. Devaney. Devaney's office spent more than two years and $5.3 million on the investigations.

The reports describe a fraternity house atmosphere inside the Denver Minerals Management Service office responsible for marketing the oil and gas that energy companies barter to the government instead of making cash royalty payments for drilling on federal lands. The government received $4.3 billion in such royalty-in-kind payments last year. The oil is then resold to energy companies or put in the nation's emergency stockpile.



"During the course of our investigation, we learned that some RIK employees frequently consumed alcohol at industry functions, had used cocaine and marijuana, and had sexual relationships with oil and gas company representatives," the report said. Two government employees who had to spend the night after a daytime industry function because they were too intoxicated to drive home were commonly referred to by energy traders as the "MMS Chicks."

Between 2002 and 2006, 19 oil marketers — nearly a third of the 55-person staff in the Denver office — received gifts and gratuities from oil and gas companies, including Chevron Corp., Shell, Hess Corp. and Denver-based Gary-Williams Energy Corp., the investigators found. The investigation focuses on nine employees — all but one of whom received ethics training — who attended meals, parties, paintball games and concerts whose value exceeded the $20-per-gift limit or $50-a-year thresholds on outside gifts. In the case of two marketers, gifts were accepted on at least 135 occasions. The report identifies eight of the employees by name and a ninth only by job description.

One worker admitted having a one-night-stand with a Shell employee. That same individual allegedly passed out business cards for her sex toy business, Passion Parties Inc., at work, and bragged that her income from that business exceeded her salary at the Interior Department. The employee was authorized to conduct such outside employment, and denied to investigators that she advertised for it during work hours, the report said. She admitted selling products to several of her subordinates.

Devaney said the investigations took so long because Chevron refused to cooperate. An Interior Department official said Chevron would not allow investigators to interview its employees.

Don Campbell, a Chevron spokesman, said Wednesday that the company "produced all of the documents that the government requested months ago." A Shell spokeswoman said it would be premature for the company to comment on the report until it had time to review it.

Maripat Sexton, a spokeswoman for Hess Corp., said the company's investigations "indicated no wrongdoing on our employee's part."

"We do not believe we are the focus of the investigation," she said.

One of the reports claims that the former head of the Denver royalty-in-kind office, Gregory W. Smith, purchased cocaine from a co-worker, and one occasion had it delivered to the office. He also allegedly had oral sex with subordinates. The report also said Smith steered government contracts to Geomatrix Consultants Inc. and used government databases and e-mail accounts to conduct business for the company, which paid him $30,000 for his work from April 2002 through June 2003. Smith retired from the office in May 2007.

Smith's attorney, Steve Peters, called the claims "sheer fantasy."

"Greg Smith was a loyal, dedicated employee of the federal government for more than 28 years," Peters said Wednesday. "His efforts in running the royalty-in-kind program resulted in one of the most profitable government programs in American history."

MMS Director Randall Luthi, in an interview, said the agency was taking the report "extremely seriously" and would review the allegations and weigh taking appropriate action in coming months. Luthi said four of the employees were transferred to other departments last year. The inspector general is recommending that current employees implicated be fired and be barred for life from working within the royalty program.

House Natural Resources Chairman Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., said "this whole IG report reads like a script from a television miniseries and one that cannot air during family viewing time. It is no wonder that the office was doing such a lousy job of overseeing the RIK program; clearly the employees had 'other' priorities in that office."

One of the employees named in the investigation, Jimmy Mayberry, already has pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Washington to violations of conflict-of-interest laws. The Justice Department declined to prosecute Smith and former Associate Director of the Minerals Revenue Management program Lucy Querques Denett, who the report says manipulated contracts to ensure they were awarded to former Interior employees.

The findings are the latest sign of trouble at the Minerals Management Service, which already has been accused of mismanaging the collection of fees from oil companies and writing faulty contracts for drilling on government land and offshore. The charges also come as Congress and both presidential candidates are debating whether to open up more federal offshore waters to oil and natural gas drilling.

"This all shows the oil industry holds shocking sway over the administration and even key federal employees," said Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla. "This is why we must not allow Big Oil's agenda to be jammed through Congress."

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., urged Democrats to reopen a House investigation of the Minerals Management Service that was initiated in 2006 by House Republicans. "Looking into and fixing these problems would have meant highlighting the enormous revenues that domestic oil and natural gas production contributes to our treasury. This just didn't fit into their anti-drilling campaign," he said.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, announced late Wednesday that he would hold a hearing on the investigations next week.

While most government royalties for drilling on federal lands are paid in cash, the government in recent years has been receiving a greater share of its oil and gas royalties in the actual product. More of that oil is also being sold on the open market, versus being deposited in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, the nation's emergency oil stockpile. Congress earlier this year passed a law halting deposits of oil to the reserve to help alleviate high gasoline prices.

The investigation was prompted by a 2006 phone call from an employee in the Denver office who reported ethical lapses.

Posted: September 10, 2008 5:39 pm
by nutmeg
Alrighty then...Nice to know they were looking out for our interests... :roll:

Posted: September 10, 2008 6:05 pm
by Frank4
It takes all kinds in this world...un-freaking-believable

Posted: September 10, 2008 6:13 pm
by SharkOnLand
Where do I get one of these jobs? I want people to give me free stuff.

Re: Govt. officials investigated over illicit sex, gifts

Posted: September 10, 2008 6:23 pm
by SMLCHNG
Joetown Parrothead wrote:http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington ... -oil_N.htm

WASHINGTON (AP) — Government officials handling billions of dollars in oil royalties improperly engaged in sex with employees of energy companies they were dealing with and received numerous gifts from them, federal investigators said Wednesday.
The alleged transgressions involve 13 former and current Interior Department employees in Denver and Washington. Their alleged improprieties include rigging contracts, working part-time as private oil consultants, and having sexual relationships with — and accepting golf and ski trips and dinners from — oil company employees, according to three reports released Wednesday by the Interior Department's inspector general.

The investigations reveal a "culture of substance abuse and promiscuity" by a small group of individuals "wholly lacking in acceptance of or adherence to government ethical standards," wrote Inspector General Earl E. Devaney. Devaney's office spent more than two years and $5.3 million on the investigations.
The reports describe a fraternity house atmosphere inside the Denver Minerals Management Service office responsible for marketing the oil and gas that energy companies barter to the government instead of making cash royalty payments for drilling on federal lands. The government received $4.3 billion in such royalty-in-kind payments last year. The oil is then resold to energy companies or put in the nation's emergency stockpile.
And gee, who pays for it? Where did that money all go?? :o

Fraternity House Atmosphere

Posted: September 10, 2008 6:32 pm
by BFinnsUp
I loved the fraternity house in college, but come on! Stop wasting our money.

I also want the executives at at the big three automakers, assuming they get the low interest government backed loans, to have to work for profits only for the term of the loans.

Also, don't forget the golden parachutes for the ceo's of fanny and freddy. I want them to have to give their $8 - 15 million dollar severance packages to the people for screwing up the company so bad that we have to bail them out.

Or, give us all jobs where when we goof up by having sex with our subordinants, use drugs, and run the companies into the ground we get seven figures to walk away.

Posted: September 10, 2008 6:37 pm
by Lightning Bolt
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Guess who WON'T be gone if you don't vote for change....

Never mind

Posted: September 10, 2008 6:39 pm
by BFinnsUp
Never mind. I am watching a TV show about cool jobs and they are interviewing a brewmaster. I have decided that when I grow up that is what I want to be.

Posted: September 10, 2008 7:13 pm
by ph4ever
is anyone really surprised about this?

Re: Govt. officials investigated over illicit sex, gifts

Posted: September 10, 2008 7:14 pm
by nutmeg
SMLCHNG wrote:
Joetown Parrothead wrote:http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington ... -oil_N.htm

WASHINGTON (AP) — Government officials handling billions of dollars in oil royalties improperly engaged in sex with employees of energy companies they were dealing with and received numerous gifts from them, federal investigators said Wednesday.
The alleged transgressions involve 13 former and current Interior Department employees in Denver and Washington. Their alleged improprieties include rigging contracts, working part-time as private oil consultants, and having sexual relationships with — and accepting golf and ski trips and dinners from — oil company employees, according to three reports released Wednesday by the Interior Department's inspector general.

The investigations reveal a "culture of substance abuse and promiscuity" by a small group of individuals "wholly lacking in acceptance of or adherence to government ethical standards," wrote Inspector General Earl E. Devaney. Devaney's office spent more than two years and $5.3 million on the investigations.
The reports describe a fraternity house atmosphere inside the Denver Minerals Management Service office responsible for marketing the oil and gas that energy companies barter to the government instead of making cash royalty payments for drilling on federal lands. The government received $4.3 billion in such royalty-in-kind payments last year. The oil is then resold to energy companies or put in the nation's emergency stockpile.
And gee, who pays for it? Where did that money all go?? :o
I'm sure you and I could have figured it out for a few hundred dollars rather than 5.3 million....

Posted: September 10, 2008 7:22 pm
by SchoolGirlHeart
Lightning Bolt wrote:Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Guess who WON'T be gone if you don't vote for change....
It won't matter. Both sides of the aisle are just as bad when it comes to this sh*t...... :-? :-? :-?

Posted: September 10, 2008 7:23 pm
by ph4ever
SchoolGirlHeart wrote:
Lightning Bolt wrote:Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Guess who WON'T be gone if you don't vote for change....
It won't matter. Both sides of the aisle are just as bad when it comes to this sh*t...... :-? :-? :-?
you can say that again

Posted: September 10, 2008 7:23 pm
by SchoolGirlHeart
ph4ever wrote:is anyone really surprised about this?
UTTERLY P*SSED OFF? Yes... :evil: :evil:

Surprised? Sadly, no..... :-?

Posted: September 10, 2008 7:27 pm
by nutmeg
Did you guys read the rest of the article??? It was even worse than the part posted.... :evil: :evil:

And prolly none of the higher ups will spend a day in jail...or even be charged with anything.

Posted: September 10, 2008 7:30 pm
by SchoolGirlHeart
nutmeg wrote:Did you guys read the rest of the article??? It was even worse than the part posted.... :evil: :evil:

And prolly none of the higher ups will spend a day in jail...or even be charged with anything.
Yup.... :evil: :evil: :evil:

Accountability

Posted: September 10, 2008 7:32 pm
by BFinnsUp
nutmeg wrote:Did you guys read the rest of the article??? It was even worse than the part posted.... :evil: :evil:

And prolly none of the higher ups will spend a day in jail...or even be charged with anything.
Why would they? We lack any sense of accoutability in this country.

Re: Accountability

Posted: September 10, 2008 8:40 pm
by nutmeg
BFinnsUp wrote:
nutmeg wrote:Did you guys read the rest of the article??? It was even worse than the part posted.... :evil: :evil:

And prolly none of the higher ups will spend a day in jail...or even be charged with anything.
Why would they? We lack any sense of accoutability in this country.
Well they sent Martha Stewart to jail for her heinous crimes.... :-?

Re: Accountability

Posted: September 10, 2008 9:09 pm
by BFinnsUp
nutmeg wrote:
BFinnsUp wrote:
nutmeg wrote:Did you guys read the rest of the article??? It was even worse than the part posted.... :evil: :evil:

And prolly none of the higher ups will spend a day in jail...or even be charged with anything.
Why would they? We lack any sense of accoutability in this country.
Well they sent Martha Stewart to jail for her heinous crimes.... :-?
Good point. Street cred to Martha for doing the time for the crime.

Re: Accountability

Posted: September 10, 2008 9:19 pm
by Wino you know
nutmeg wrote:
BFinnsUp wrote:
nutmeg wrote:Did you guys read the rest of the article??? It was even worse than the part posted.... :evil: :evil:

And prolly none of the higher ups will spend a day in jail...or even be charged with anything.
Why would they? We lack any sense of accoutability in this country.
Well they sent Martha Stewart to jail for her heinous crimes.... :-?
Sending her to jail was the STUPIDEST thing since O.J. the murdering bast--d was found not guilty.

Re: Accountability

Posted: September 10, 2008 9:23 pm
by BFinnsUp
Wino you know wrote:
nutmeg wrote:
BFinnsUp wrote:
nutmeg wrote:Did you guys read the rest of the article??? It was even worse than the part posted.... :evil: :evil:

And prolly none of the higher ups will spend a day in jail...or even be charged with anything.
Why would they? We lack any sense of accoutability in this country.
Well they sent Martha Stewart to jail for her heinous crimes.... :-?
Sending her to jail was the STUPIDEST thing since O.J. the murdering bast--d was found not guilty.
Has anyone heard how his current trial is going?