Page 1 of 7
Debate #1
Posted: September 26, 2008 9:11 pm
by BFinnsUp
The debate is on.
In the opening addresses Senator McCain mentioned that Senator Kennedy has been hospitalized again.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/26/ ... =hpmostpop
Posted: September 26, 2008 9:25 pm
by SMLCHNG
CBS news is reporting that Senator Ted Kennedy suffered a mild seizure this afternoon at home and was taken to Cape Cod Hospital. He's expected to return home tonight to watch the debate
Posted: September 26, 2008 9:28 pm
by Wino you know
They said he's "resting comfortably" at home.
I wonder how COMFORTABLE a person who's had a tumor removed from his brain can be.
Posted: September 26, 2008 9:41 pm
by BFinnsUp
Hopefully the drugs they give him help a little.
Jim Lehrer
Posted: September 26, 2008 9:45 pm
by BFinnsUp
I like the way that Jim Lehrer is managing this. So often these things don't get a good conversation between the candidates and he is pushing for that.
Palin
Posted: September 26, 2008 10:48 pm
by BFinnsUp
Why did Palin decline to be the post debate response on NBC for her own ticket? That seems odd to me.
Re: Palin
Posted: September 26, 2008 10:52 pm
by Tequila Revenge
BFinnsUp wrote:Why did Palin decline to be the post debate response on NBC for her own ticket? That seems odd to me.
Geeeezzzzeeeeee....... I dunno know
NBC has treated her so well over the past two weeks. WTF!!! Remember, there's an ass for every chair in this world
Re: Palin
Posted: September 26, 2008 10:55 pm
by Tequila Revenge
Re: Jim Lehrer
Posted: September 26, 2008 10:58 pm
by SMLCHNG
BFinnsUp wrote:I like the way that Jim Lehrer is managing this. So often these things don't get a good conversation between the candidates and he is pushing for that.
I agree, he did a good job.
Re: Palin
Posted: September 26, 2008 10:58 pm
by BFinnsUp
Good point. I forgot about that idiotic and insulting move.
Fact checker
Posted: September 26, 2008 11:00 pm
by BFinnsUp
NBC just had their fat check run down through some of the talking points, I love that part. Just reminds us all that they will say what they think they need to to win.
Re: Fact checker
Posted: September 26, 2008 11:02 pm
by SMLCHNG
BFinnsUp wrote:NBC just had their fat check run down through some of the talking points, I love that part. Just reminds us all that they will say what they think they need to to win.
I'm guessing you meant faCt?? Yeah.. it was interesting.
Re: Fact checker
Posted: September 26, 2008 11:03 pm
by Tequila Revenge
BFinnsUp wrote:NBC just had their fat check run down through some of the talking points, I love that part. Just reminds us all that they will say what they think they need to to win.
NO WAY!!!
Re: Fact checker
Posted: September 26, 2008 11:04 pm
by BFinnsUp
SMLCHNG wrote:BFinnsUp wrote:NBC just had their fat check run down through some of the talking points, I love that part. Just reminds us all that they will say what they think they need to to win.
I'm guessing you meant faCt?? Yeah.. it was interesting.
The statements are generally wrong and sometimes inflated, but yes I meant fact.
Re: Fact checker
Posted: September 26, 2008 11:04 pm
by SMLCHNG
Re: Fact checker
Posted: September 26, 2008 11:05 pm
by SMLCHNG
BFinnsUp wrote:SMLCHNG wrote:BFinnsUp wrote:NBC just had their fat check run down through some of the talking points, I love that part. Just reminds us all that they will say what they think they need to to win.
I'm guessing you meant faCt?? Yeah.. it was interesting.
The statements are generally wrong and sometimes inflated, but yes I meant fact.
I swear when I first read it, I thought it was 'fat chick' and I almost punched you.
Posted: September 26, 2008 11:05 pm
by Tequila Revenge
Mings looked more "Presidential" than Obama tonight
Re: Fact checker
Posted: September 26, 2008 11:07 pm
by Tequila Revenge
So you think the Raiders lost again tonight?
Re: Fact checker
Posted: September 26, 2008 11:11 pm
by BFinnsUp
SMLCHNG wrote:BFinnsUp wrote:SMLCHNG wrote:BFinnsUp wrote:NBC just had their fat check run down through some of the talking points, I love that part. Just reminds us all that they will say what they think they need to to win.
I'm guessing you meant faCt?? Yeah.. it was interesting.
The statements are generally wrong and sometimes inflated, but yes I meant fact.
I swear when I first read it, I thought it was 'fat chick' and I almost punched you.
Wow a threat of violence from a moderator.
I would never have said that, not in my worst drunken stupor.
Re: Fact checker
Posted: September 26, 2008 11:11 pm
by BFinnsUp
Tequila Revenge wrote:
So you think the Raiders lost again tonight?
Only if they played. GO BILLS!
