Page 3 of 4
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 14, 2009 1:09 am
by moog
[quote="carolinagirl"]
We had five bands of potential tornados coming through my town today, and one of them had a tornado in it. Our local weatherman kept twittering with updates, so that was helpful.
I understand it can be used as another tool. That's why I left a 5 percent window
Also, Ann Curry tweeted when the Captain was captured and pirates shot, so I heard that first on Twitter. I used to get my news like that first on Buffett News, but Twitter is quicker. Anderson Cooper posts good links and blogs as soon as they are posted on CNN. NYTimes and WSJ are good sources too. Just feels good to stay informed and current. My hubby tweets from the daily paper so I can see what he is doing too and when local news is breaking.
Again, I agree it can be used as a tool. However, I can wait till print or the PBS News Hour spends time on assembling the information. Unless you have family on the ship, is it important to know as it happens? Can it wait till research is done? Most information is just there to fill the short attention span. Goes in, then out. Assembly line.
And I love dawgfan's morning kick offs to start the day. Another female TV reporter tweets what she is covering before (fires, accidents) she even tapes the report. Then she tweets about her mom visiting and what games she's watching on the weekend. You just get inside people's lives a little bit at a time.
I understand. I have trouble getting inside my own life, nevermind some make believe journalist's. I do find it disturbing a reporter is sending information without taking the time to edit or even fact check
Sorry if I am pushing Twitter so much... It is just such a cool new phenom... phenononu...phenomenum -- thingy -- and it is weird that my hubby and I joined it separately on the same day without discussing it with each other ....
I understand. I won't criticize you as an individual for doing it. We make our own choice on how to use the tools available to obtain information.
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 14, 2009 8:57 am
by LIPH
Everything you need to know in 140 characters or less. Another example of the attention span challenged society we've become. I'll pass.
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 14, 2009 8:59 am
by dawgfan
carolinagirl wrote:moog wrote:Capt.Flock wrote:love twitter you can see the news as it happens
Two questions.
1 Why the need to know as it happens? I guess I can see someone on the west typing out "...a mushroom cloud is heading east". That could be useful. Which brings me to.....
2 How accurate is "as it happens"? For example, who is the source? I don't see how on the spot twitting can be informative for 95 percent of the crap that happens on this planet. I would rather have the time to do research before transmitting off the cuff news.
I know you don't have to follow useless banter on Twitt. I'm just talking about the very brief thought process, if any, that goes into sending information out. Well, that can happen with any type of communication.
We had five bands of potential tornados coming through my town today, and one of them had a tornado in it. Our local weatherman kept twittering with updates, so that was helpful.
Also, Ann Curry tweeted when the Captain was captured and pirates shot, so I heard that first on Twitter. I used to get my news like that first on Buffett News, but Twitter is quicker. Anderson Cooper posts good links and blogs as soon as they are posted on CNN. NYTimes and WSJ are good sources too. Just feels good to stay informed and current. My hubby tweets from the daily paper so I can see what he is doing too and when local news is breaking.
And I love dawgfan's morning kick offs to start the day. Another female TV reporter tweets what she is covering before (fires, accidents) she even tapes the report. Then she tweets about her mom visiting and what games she's watching on the weekend. You just get inside people's lives a little bit at a time.
Thanks, I could not believe the number of people that tweeted me & messaged me on facebook to ask if I was OK because I did not have my morning status the last couple of days
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 14, 2009 9:06 am
by Moonie
I get plenty of hard news on the news channels that run 24/7....
it's not important that I get the news as it happens...got enough of that 4/19/95 and 9/11/01.
celebrities in the news I could care less about. their personal lives are boring and inconsequential to my life.
but, that's just me. I found the doggie cam much more entertaining than knowing what any celebrity, including Mr. Buffett, is doing at the exact present time.
for those that do have an appetite for such, I'm glad you have twitter.
Do they call you a twit if you twitter frequently?

Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 14, 2009 9:35 am
by dawgfan
A great article Twitter, it may not be for everybody but it is another nice tool to have in Technology
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/14/techn ... f=business
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 14, 2009 10:36 am
by carolinagirl
LIPH wrote:Everything you need to know in 140 characters or less. Another example of the attention span challenged society we've become. I'll pass.
But you just did it right there. All your posts are 140 characters or less. You're a natural!

Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 14, 2009 10:42 am
by carolinagirl
Moonie wrote:
Do they call you a twit if you twitter frequently?

Guess you missed my post on page one.

Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 14, 2009 10:55 am
by Capt.Flock
Moonie wrote:I get plenty of hard news on the news channels that run 24/7....
it's not important that I get the news as it happens...got enough of that 4/19/95 and 9/11/01.
celebrities in the news I could care less about. their personal lives are boring and inconsequential to my life.
but, that's just me. I found the doggie cam much more entertaining than knowing what any celebrity, including Mr. Buffett, is doing at the exact present time.
for those that do have an appetite for such, I'm glad you have twitter.
Do they call you a twit if you twitter frequently?

Twitter is very useful. In fact it has been to help stage protest in other countries where the government regulates news content. It is being use a business tool for some businesses.
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 14, 2009 11:24 am
by Moonie
Capt.Flock wrote:
Twitter is very useful. In fact it has been to help stage protest in other countries where the government regulates news content. It is being use a business tool for some businesses.
Oh that I have no doubt. I suspect those countries will limit its availability, tho, in the future, as some have emails.
And it's terrific in the application dawgfan mentioned...I'm not sure I'd want my brain surgery followed on twitter....
I just don't see the interest in the minute by minute play of what clebs, or not, are doing.
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 14, 2009 11:28 am
by Capt.Flock
Moonie wrote:Capt.Flock wrote:
Twitter is very useful. In fact it has been to help stage protest in other countries where the government regulates news content. It is being use a business tool for some businesses.
Oh that I have no doubt. I suspect those countries will limit its availability, tho, in the future, as some have emails.
And it's terrific in the application dawgfan mentioned...I'm not sure I'd want my brain surgery followed on twitter....
I just don't see the interest in the minute by minute play of what clebs, or not, are doing.
for me it is nice to see what is happening in the technology field with certain reporters
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 14, 2009 11:35 am
by surfpirate
Twitter will never replace the fanatical monitoring of internet forums and commenting with
on every single bit of minutia posted ...... because THAT, my friends, is what is truly important and what makes the internet (a series of tubes according to one former Alaskan politician) go round.
http://twitter.com/thesurfpirate
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 14, 2009 11:48 am
by Moonie
carolinagirl wrote:
Moonie wrote:
Do they call you a twit if you twitter frequently?

Guess you missed my post on page one.

that's it exactly...I'm not sure I started on Pg. 1 of this thread, as often happens, I'll read back only 1 or 2 pages, if at all...
and sometimes if I do start on Pg, 1 or read back pages, I certainly won't retain all that I read.
but, to each his own...that's what makes the world as colorful as it is...do your own thing!!
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 21, 2009 12:51 pm
by blackjack
I finally caved...
I am a Twit. I don't post yet, but I follow Bubba, Daniel Negreanu and Howard Stern.
Daniel Negreanu is a poker player for those who don't know and he's been in a tournament the past few days and has been tweeting updates every so often.
With Jimmy's crew..."hot night tonight, ready to go on stage", not as exciting.
Stern's show is so-so, I like updates on what's coming up next, but they are not frequent enough.
We'll see how it goes.
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 21, 2009 3:16 pm
by PIA
i just got twitter!!!
and eric is right...the news comes so fast....fox news has taken over my home page
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 22, 2009 3:43 am
by Spider Johnson
So what will you do when the power goes out? Say for several days or weeks, such as a mega storm hits amd knocks everything out?
My opinion is that people have become far too dependent upon electronic technology. It is well known that if our Sun has a violent activity event, it will cause catastrophic failure in satellites and communications (among other things) so what will people actually do, that depend and rely on such tech?
Not to mention such effects will have on everyone else and industry.
Can you say goodbye cell phones and GPS for examples?
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 22, 2009 12:30 pm
by carolinagirl
Spider Johnson wrote:So what will you do when the power goes out? Say for several days or weeks, such as a mega storm hits amd knocks everything out?
My opinion is that people have become far too dependent upon electronic technology. It is well known that if our Sun has a violent activity event, it will cause catastrophic failure in satellites and communications (among other things) so what will people actually do, that depend and rely on such tech?
Not to mention such effects will have on everyone else and industry.
Can you say goodbye cell phones and GPS for examples?
What do you mean, what will we do? Just do without or listen to the radio, like everyone else does when the TV goes out. I don't understand the "dependence" you're talking about. If it it enhances your life, why not enjoy it while you can? Nothing lasts forever, including this life. Would you say, don't do anything, because we're all going to die anyway?
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 22, 2009 5:02 pm
by Spider Johnson
carolinagirl wrote:Spider Johnson wrote:So what will you do when the power goes out? Say for several days or weeks, such as a mega storm hits amd knocks everything out?
My opinion is that people have become far too dependent upon electronic technology. It is well known that if our Sun has a violent activity event, it will cause catastrophic failure in satellites and communications (among other things) so what will people actually do, that depend and rely on such tech?
Not to mention such effects will have on everyone else and industry.
Can you say goodbye cell phones and GPS for examples?
What do you mean, what will we do? Just do without or listen to the radio, like everyone else does when the TV goes out. I don't understand the "dependence" you're talking about. If it it enhances your life, why not enjoy it while you can? Nothing lasts forever, including this life. Would you say, don't do anything, because we're all going to die anyway?
I mean some people are addicted to such tech. From video games to cell phones to whatever.
What these "e-junkies" going to do when the power goes out or is not available for an unknown length of time? Cut them off from thier latest greatest wizbang gadget and what will they do?
Example: There are newspapers going out of the "hard print" business. They cannot economically compete with "online" news. It seems people have given up on reading hard copy data. THAT is what I mean.
If you or anyone else, want to settle for twitter or whatever the latest greatest electronic thingie delivering all the latest celebrity gossip,news, or whatever, and monitoring everyday minutae of people's lives and follow them around, go for it. I am quite sure if the goverment were providing such access to people's lives, many people would be raising holyhell and calling it an invasion of privacy. Yet people are volunteering and want to do it? Ok let them. Leave me out of it
I have no real interest in celebrities or others private lives or keeping up with them and following them around. Private lives are just that, private. I am not impressed with it and want nothing to do with it. Keep your 140 or whatever character news bytes.
Why should I or anyone else spend time posting such data, and allowing people, we do not really know, to have access to it? Meanwhile what else is happening in the real world around us and what are people doing with their lives in the real world?
Think your info is safe? You better guess again. Humans created it and somewhere out there are humans that can defeat it.
Again everyone that wants to, use it and enjoy it! Call me old fashioned or whatever. I want nothing to do with it!
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 22, 2009 5:35 pm
by ph4ever
Spider Johnson wrote:carolinagirl wrote:Spider Johnson wrote:So what will you do when the power goes out? Say for several days or weeks, such as a mega storm hits amd knocks everything out?
My opinion is that people have become far too dependent upon electronic technology. It is well known that if our Sun has a violent activity event, it will cause catastrophic failure in satellites and communications (among other things) so what will people actually do, that depend and rely on such tech?
Not to mention such effects will have on everyone else and industry.
Can you say goodbye cell phones and GPS for examples?
What do you mean, what will we do? Just do without or listen to the radio, like everyone else does when the TV goes out. I don't understand the "dependence" you're talking about. If it it enhances your life, why not enjoy it while you can? Nothing lasts forever, including this life. Would you say, don't do anything, because we're all going to die anyway?
I mean some people are addicted to such tech. From video games to cell phones to whatever.
What these "e-junkies" going to do when the power goes out or is not available for an unknown length of time? Cut them off from thier latest greatest wizbang gadget and what will they do?
Example: There are newspapers going out of the "hard print" business. They cannot economically compete with "online" news. It seems people have given up on reading hard copy data. THAT is what I mean.
If you or anyone else, want to settle for twitter or whatever the latest greatest electronic thingie delivering all the latest celebrity gossip,news, or whatever, and monitoring everyday minutae of people's lives and follow them around, go for it. I am quite sure if the goverment were providing such access to people's lives, many people would be raising holyhell and calling it an invasion of privacy. Yet people are volunteering and want to do it? Ok let them. Leave me out of it
I have no real interest in celebrities or others private lives or keeping up with them and following them around. Private lives are just that, private. I am not impressed with it and want nothing to do with it. Keep your 140 or whatever character news bytes.
Why should I or anyone else spend time posting such data, and allowing people, we do not really know, to have access to it? Meanwhile what else is happening in the real world around us and what are people doing with their lives in the real world?
Think your info is safe? You better guess again. Humans created it and somewhere out there are humans that can defeat it.
Again everyone that wants to, use it and enjoy it! Call me old fashioned or whatever. I want nothing to do with it!
If you have no real interest in following celibrities then what are you doing on a Buffett board Sam? Certain aspects of this board involve following him around. Why did you even bother to register under an assumed name from a different IP address to come back if you have no interest Sam?
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 22, 2009 6:13 pm
by LIPH
ph4ever wrote:If you have no real interest in following celibrities then what are you doing on a Buffett board Sam? Certain aspects of this board involve following him around. Why did you even bother to register under an assumed name from a different IP address to come back if you have no interest Sam?
He likes to bait people and he's a master at it. Baiting.
![noeyedear-shrugging [smilie=noeyedear-shrugging.gif]](./images/smilies/noeyedear-shrugging.gif)
Re: Twitter?
Posted: April 22, 2009 6:19 pm
by ph4ever
LIPH wrote:ph4ever wrote:If you have no real interest in following celibrities then what are you doing on a Buffett board Sam? Certain aspects of this board involve following him around. Why did you even bother to register under an assumed name from a different IP address to come back if you have no interest Sam?
He likes to bait people and he's a master at it. Baiting.
![noeyedear-shrugging [smilie=noeyedear-shrugging.gif]](./images/smilies/noeyedear-shrugging.gif)
Ice water thru the nose kinda hurts Larry. I think I snorted a cube sliver out.
