Skibo wrote:I'll watch any western made before 1970 that doesn't have Jimmy Stewart in it. The stuff made after 1970 starts to drag in political bias and are less historically accurate.
If anything, films made post-1970 benefit from having much more accurate info about the the time period available to them or is this what is referred to as "revisionist history"? As for not wanting Westerns to provoke thought, why should they be any different from other genres of movies? Over the years, Westerns have incorporated elements of comedy
and drama. Some, have even shot for a sense of realism, true to the time period. For years it was believed Columbus discovered America. Is it considered "revisonist" history that he did
not? Once new, accurate information has been made available I see no harm in it being utilized in the making of movies or the re-writing of history books. I also have no problem with movies such as
The Unforgiven that make us look at gunslingers from a different point of view than was the norm in Westerns to start with.