NYC Prostesters thread gone???

longlinergirl · Post by **longlinergirl** » August 30, 2004 1:02 pm

The thread NYC prostesters will march for anything....I know it WAS here cause I posted in it and I received an email saying someone else had posted...so where is it???????

jollymon345 · Post by **jollymon345** » August 30, 2004 1:03 pm

It was here about 10 minutes ago. Whats up wit dat? You got an e-mail. I didn't get an e-mail. Whats up wit dat?

tommcat327 · Post by **tommcat327** » August 30, 2004 1:09 pm

WE KNEW THAT ONE WOULD GET DELETED.PEOPLE LIKED IT

rednekkPH · Post by **rednekkPH** » August 30, 2004 1:10 pm

Oh, come on - by now we should all know that fun = deletion.

longlinergirl · Post by **longlinergirl** » August 30, 2004 1:11 pm

But why was it deleted??? They can just delete any one they want?

Melli_Fera · Post by **Melli_Fera** » August 30, 2004 1:13 pm

longlinergirl wrote:But why was it deleted??? They can just delete any one they want?

uhhhhh.... DOH!

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » August 30, 2004 1:18 pm

longlinergirl wrote:But why was it deleted??? They can just delete any one they want?

Yep

longlinergirl · Post by **longlinergirl** » August 30, 2004 1:19 pm

THEY have too much power...can I call for a mutniey(sp?) without being banned myself???

SchoolGirlHeart · Post by **SchoolGirlHeart** » August 30, 2004 1:28 pm

longlinergirl wrote:THEY have too much power...can I call for a mutniey(sp?) without being banned myself???

"THEY" = phjim, who owns and pays for this site. Jim's house, Jim's rules. He can delete whatever he wants.

Any of us who don't like the way phjim runs this site are free to cough up our own money, put in the tons of work involved, and create our own sites, where we would then make the rules.

Here, we're guests.

tommcat327 · Post by **tommcat327** » August 30, 2004 1:29 pm

SchoolGirlHeart wrote:
longlinergirl wrote:THEY have too much power...can I call for a mutniey(sp?) without being banned myself???
"THEY" = phjim, who owns and pays for this site. Jim's house, Jim's rules. He can delete whatever he wants.

Any of us who don't like the way phjim runs this site are free to cough up our own money, put in the tons of work involved, and create our own sites, where we would then make the rules.

Here, we're guests.

THAT EXCUSE IS GETTING KIND OF OLD THOUGH.TIME TO COME UP WITH A NEW ONE

SchoolGirlHeart · Post by **SchoolGirlHeart** » August 30, 2004 1:36 pm

tommcat327 wrote:
SchoolGirlHeart wrote:
longlinergirl wrote:THEY have too much power...can I call for a mutniey(sp?) without being banned myself???
"THEY" = phjim, who owns and pays for this site. Jim's house, Jim's rules. He can delete whatever he wants.

Any of us who don't like the way phjim runs this site are free to cough up our own money, put in the tons of work involved, and create our own sites, where we would then make the rules.

Here, we're guests.
THAT EXCUSE IS GETTING KIND OF OLD THOUGH.TIME TO COME UP WITH A NEW ONE

it's not an excuse, Tomm, it's a fact. this site BELONGS TO JIM. if a thread gets locked or deleted, it's because Jim himself did it or a moderator did it with Jim's blessing. Jim decides what he does or doesn't want on this site. if we don't like it, we're free to walk away anytime and establish our own site.

tommcat327 · Post by **tommcat327** » August 30, 2004 1:47 pm

SchoolGirlHeart wrote:it's not an excuse, Tomm, it's a fact. this site BELONGS TO JIM. if a thread gets locked or deleted, it's because Jim himself did it or a moderator did it with Jim's blessing. Jim decides what he does or doesn't want on this site. if we don't like it, we're free to walk away anytime and establish our own site.

I KNOW THE RULES,THEY'VE BEEN QUOTED HERE ENOUGH TIMES FOR ME TO KNOW THEM BY HEART,ALONG WITH THE JIMS SANDBOX SPEECH.MY POINT IS THAT IT HAPPENS A LITTLE TOO FREQUENTLY AND VERY UNFAIRLY.ONLY CERTAIN PEOPLE GET BANNED,LOCKED OUT OR DELETED AROUND HERE.AND NOTHING OFFENSIVE IS GENERALLY SAID TO CAUSE IT,WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE RULES

zanth · Post by **zanth** » August 30, 2004 1:48 pm

How did the thread in question violate any of the below rules of conduct?
Ok, maybe a bit with the sexual stuff, but for sure worse than the thread about most outrageous concert experiences.

Seems to me the rules are being not being enforces in a judicious, impartial manner.

Forum Rules (Updated) wrote:All users of the Discussion Board are reminded to read the following terms that they agreed to when registering:

While the administrators and moderators of this forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. Therefore you acknowledge that all posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author and not the administrators, moderators or webmaster (except for posts by these people) and hence will not be held liable.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should they see fit.

Members who use the board to email other users will also be bound by the rules for posting messages. In addition members who abuse the email option by sending inappropiate material may be reported to their ISP and email service provider (because the IP address is recorded).

Additional rules:

- Users should treat the moderators and the board admin with courtesy and respect. Any name calling or using obscene language will not be tolerated. Any issues you have with a moderator will be handled by the admin of the board by sending an email to info@buffettnews.com.

- Creating a new username that's similar to existing usernames for the purpose of imitating another user is prohibited.

Each violation of these terms will be treaded on a case by case basis. A warning, temporary ban, or permanent ban from the discussion board may be put into effect for users who violate the policies.

GrannaC · Post by **GrannaC** » August 30, 2004 1:49 pm

tommcat327 wrote:
SchoolGirlHeart wrote:it's not an excuse, Tomm, it's a fact. this site BELONGS TO JIM. if a thread gets locked or deleted, it's because Jim himself did it or a moderator did it with Jim's blessing. Jim decides what he does or doesn't want on this site. if we don't like it, we're free to walk away anytime and establish our own site.
I KNOW THE RULES,THEY'VE BEEN QUOTED HERE ENOUGH TIMES FOR ME TO KNOW THEM BY HEART,ALONG WITH THE JIMS SANDBOX SPEECH.MY POINT IS THAT IT HAPPENS A LITTLE TOO FREQUENTLY AND VERY UNFAIRLY.ONLY CERTAIN PEOPLE GET BANNED,LOCKED OUT OR DELETED AROUND HERE.AND NOTHING OFFENSIVE IS GENERALLY SAID TO CAUSE IT,WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE RULES

I give this thread about another 15 minutes . . .

zanth · Post by **zanth** » August 30, 2004 1:49 pm

tommcat327 wrote:ONLY CERTAIN PEOPLE GET BANNED,LOCKED OUT OR DELETED AROUND HERE.AND NOTHING OFFENSIVE IS GENERALLY SAID TO CAUSE IT,WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE RULES

Thank you (can't believe I'm agreeing with Mr. Caps Lock)

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » August 30, 2004 1:50 pm

zanth wrote:
tommcat327 wrote:ONLY CERTAIN PEOPLE GET BANNED,LOCKED OUT OR DELETED AROUND HERE.AND NOTHING OFFENSIVE IS GENERALLY SAID TO CAUSE IT,WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE RULES
Thank you (can't believe I'm agreeing with Mr. Caps Lock)

I'm somewhat in awe myself!!

tommcat327 · Post by **tommcat327** » August 30, 2004 1:51 pm

zanth wrote:
tommcat327 wrote:ONLY CERTAIN PEOPLE GET BANNED,LOCKED OUT OR DELETED AROUND HERE.AND NOTHING OFFENSIVE IS GENERALLY SAID TO CAUSE IT,WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE RULES
Thank you (can't believe I'm agreeing with Mr. Caps Lock)

YOU'LL GET USED TO IT

MojosMama · Post by **MojosMama** » August 30, 2004 1:52 pm

buffettbride wrote:
zanth wrote:
tommcat327 wrote:ONLY CERTAIN PEOPLE GET BANNED,LOCKED OUT OR DELETED AROUND HERE.AND NOTHING OFFENSIVE IS GENERALLY SAID TO CAUSE IT,WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE RULES
Thank you (can't believe I'm agreeing with Mr. Caps Lock)
I'm somewhat in awe myself!!

Wait just a minute here....are we ALL in agreement?

(can I get a little group hug here?)

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » August 30, 2004 1:53 pm

MojosMama wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
zanth wrote:
tommcat327 wrote:ONLY CERTAIN PEOPLE GET BANNED,LOCKED OUT OR DELETED AROUND HERE.AND NOTHING OFFENSIVE IS GENERALLY SAID TO CAUSE IT,WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE RULES
Thank you (can't believe I'm agreeing with Mr. Caps Lock)
I'm somewhat in awe myself!!
Wait just a minute here....are we ALL in agreement?

(can I get a little group hug here?)

Ummm. Sandi. Is that YOUR hand????

zanth · Post by **zanth** » August 30, 2004 1:53 pm

tommcat327 wrote:
zanth wrote:
tommcat327 wrote:ONLY CERTAIN PEOPLE GET BANNED,LOCKED OUT OR DELETED AROUND HERE.AND NOTHING OFFENSIVE IS GENERALLY SAID TO CAUSE IT,WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE RULES
Thank you (can't believe I'm agreeing with Mr. Caps Lock)
YOU'LL GET USED TO IT

Watch it, we'll get off topic