Page 2 of 3

Posted: September 23, 2004 9:50 pm
by ragtopW
big hat carmen wrote:
sirgumby77 wrote: WRONG
Hair Tests can go back up to 9 (nine) Years. Just passed one a few weeks ago.
It depends upon the type of test, varies from a few months to several years. How far back you want to go determines the price of the test. Not many companies will pay for the more sophisitcated and expensive tests.
And isn't there a point where is is none of the companies biz?????

Posted: September 24, 2004 9:26 am
by rednekkPH
ragtopW wrote:And isn't there a point where is is none of the companies biz?????
Yes there is - and that point is any time you are not on the clock. As far as I'm concerned, if you are not under the influence (drugs, alcohol, whatever) while you are on their nickel, it's none of their damn business. If a company wants to control what you do in your off-time, they should pay you for 24 hours per day.

Posted: September 24, 2004 9:30 am
by nycparrothead
rednekkPH wrote:If a company wants to control what you do in your off-time, they should pay you for 24 hours per day.
I've been waiting a year and a half for you to say something intelligent and FINALLY it has happened!!! Bravo Brethren Frank!!! Bravo!!! :D

Posted: September 24, 2004 11:15 am
by Caribbean Soul Man
rednekkPH wrote:If a company wants to control what you do in your off-time, they should pay you for 24 hours per day.
Amen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: September 24, 2004 11:31 am
by ES Parrothead
I feel the same way and I don't even smoke pot. I guess I can see it if you operating heavy machinery or driving a school bus or something but when you're off the clock you're off the clok in my opinion. When do they start giving the test that tells whether you beat your spouse or not?

Posted: September 24, 2004 11:54 am
by RinglingRingling
actually... I see there is one option that is missing on the poll.

As long as he is straight enough to perform when I paid $40 to sit on a lawn and dodge idiots, I don't care if he cores out Opus X Churchills, and repacks them with an ounce of crack.

Posted: September 24, 2004 12:30 pm
by citcat
big hat carmen wrote:
sirgumby77 wrote: WRONG
Hair Tests can go back up to 9 (nine) Years. Just passed one a few weeks ago.
It depends upon the type of test, varies from a few months to several years. How far back you want to go determines the price of the test. Not many companies will pay for the more sophisitcated and expensive tests.
I've got long hair, and no part of it is more than three or four years old!!! I know this because I hit the bottle (I really AM a blonde, I just 'enhance' the lightness 8) :wink: ) every month. Who keeps hair on their body for nine years? Egads :o Stephen King could write a book about that! :o I know! Crystal Gayle....her hair's past her knees!

Posted: September 24, 2004 12:37 pm
by RinglingRingling
citcat wrote:
big hat carmen wrote:
sirgumby77 wrote: WRONG
Hair Tests can go back up to 9 (nine) Years. Just passed one a few weeks ago.
It depends upon the type of test, varies from a few months to several years. How far back you want to go determines the price of the test. Not many companies will pay for the more sophisitcated and expensive tests.
I've got long hair, and no part of it is more than three or four years old!!! I know this because I hit the bottle (I really AM a blonde, I just 'enhance' the lightness 8) :wink: ) every month. Who keeps hair on their body for nine years? Egads :o Stephen King could write a book about that! :o I know! Crystal Gayle....her hair's past her knees!
So you are saying grey isn't lighter than blonde? :D

























:running like mad for the exit:

Posted: September 24, 2004 12:40 pm
by citcat
Run like the wind.....you'll never get away!! How did you know? You been looking in my windows?

Posted: September 24, 2004 12:48 pm
by RinglingRingling
citcat wrote:Run like the wind.....you'll never get away!! How did you know? You been looking in my windows?
I am old, fat, slow, bald, and really short.. I guess I better just die where I stand. :D

and not this week... :pirate:

Posted: September 24, 2004 12:54 pm
by citcat
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: September 24, 2004 12:58 pm
by RinglingRingling
citcat wrote::lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
You thought I was kidding...

I gotta look up to look Gimli in the eye.

Posted: September 24, 2004 9:04 pm
by ragtopW
rednekkPH wrote:
ragtopW wrote:And isn't there a point where is is none of the companies biz?????
Yes there is - and that point is any time you are not on the clock. As far as I'm concerned, if you are not under the influence (drugs, alcohol, whatever) while you are on their nickel, it's none of their damn business. If a company wants to control what you do in your off-time, they should pay you for 24 hours per day.
You Da man !!!

Posted: September 24, 2004 10:45 pm
by NYCPORT
sirgumby77 wrote:
12 lb. nestle crunch wrote:a hair test can trace back up to 3 months, while a urine test can only go back 2 weeks. if someone would happen to shave their head on the day of the test :-? , than nail samples can be used.

you learn a lot about drug testing in catholic school! i got tested on my 18th b-day

whether or not jimmy smokes, i dont think thats our business


WRONG

Hair Tests can go back up to 9 (nine) Years. Just passed one a few

weeks ago.
If you were hiring Gumby you'd go for the most exspensive test too!

Posted: September 24, 2004 10:59 pm
by ladyparrothead
rednekkPH wrote:
ragtopW wrote:And isn't there a point where is is none of the companies biz?????
Yes there is - and that point is any time you are not on the clock. As far as I'm concerned, if you are not under the influence (drugs, alcohol, whatever) while you are on their nickel, it's none of their damn business. If a company wants to control what you do in your off-time, they should pay you for 24 hours per day.
I don't usually get in to these conversations, but I so agree with you guys! WHATEVER I do on my time, is not any of work's business. Kinda like seperation of church and state - seperation of work and not work. As long as my personal life does not "interfere" with work, it isn't work's bidness. 8) This applies to everything I do. Having an employer check your credit history before giving you a job is wrong. Thankfully, I don't have to worry about this stuff but I've known too many people that have had issues like these come up and to me it just ain't right.

OK, I'll get off my soapbox now. :o

Posted: September 25, 2004 10:41 pm
by bravedave
Here's a hair test neither one of us could pass:
do you have more on your head than on your back [ear, bathroom floor, etc]?
:lol:

Posted: September 25, 2004 11:36 pm
by SMLCHNG
bravedave wrote:Here's a hair test neither one of us could pass:
do you have more on your head than on your back [ear, bathroom floor, etc]?
:lol:
Sorry Dave. ;) I think *I* could pass that test. :D

Posted: September 26, 2004 1:27 pm
by bravedave
SMLCHNG wrote:
bravedave wrote:Here's a hair test neither one of us could pass:
do you have more on your head than on your back [ear, bathroom floor, etc]?
:lol:
Sorry Dave. ;) I think *I* could pass that test. :D
Gawd, I'm sure you could! :D
(I'm just talkin about me & Jimmy -- sorry for the confusion)

Posted: September 26, 2004 2:22 pm
by tikitatas
ladyparrothead wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
ragtopW wrote:And isn't there a point where is is none of the companies biz?????
Yes there is - and that point is any time you are not on the clock. As far as I'm concerned, if you are not under the influence (drugs, alcohol, whatever) while you are on their nickel, it's none of their damn business. If a company wants to control what you do in your off-time, they should pay you for 24 hours per day.
I don't usually get in to these conversations, but I so agree with you guys! WHATEVER I do on my time, is not any of work's business. Kinda like seperation of church and state - seperation of work and not work. As long as my personal life does not "interfere" with work, it isn't work's bidness. 8) This applies to everything I do. Having an employer check your credit history before giving you a job is wrong. Thankfully, I don't have to worry about this stuff but I've known too many people that have had issues like these come up and to me it just ain't right.

OK, I'll get off my soapbox now. :o

And what about who you sleep with?!?!?

Posted: September 26, 2004 7:48 pm
by ragtopW
tikitatas wrote:
ladyparrothead wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
ragtopW wrote:And isn't there a point where is is none of the companies biz?????
Yes there is - and that point is any time you are not on the clock. As far as I'm concerned, if you are not under the influence (drugs, alcohol, whatever) while you are on their nickel, it's none of their damn business. If a company wants to control what you do in your off-time, they should pay you for 24 hours per day.
I don't usually get in to these conversations, but I so agree with you guys! WHATEVER I do on my time, is not any of work's business. Kinda like seperation of church and state - seperation of work and not work. As long as my personal life does not "interfere" with work, it isn't work's bidness. 8) This applies to everything I do. Having an employer check your credit history before giving you a job is wrong. Thankfully, I don't have to worry about this stuff but I've known too many people that have had issues like these come up and to me it just ain't right.

OK, I'll get off my soapbox now. :o

And what about who you sleep with?!?!?
the one thing Directv is not at all worried about is who sleeps with who.

unless one is a supervisor and the other is a peon.