Liberals Complaint Department

GrannaC · Post by **GrannaC** » November 3, 2004 4:28 pm

a1aara wrote:aperently you've had no luck at picking a fight on this board today

Apparently you have

(wow, I'm on top twice in this thread . . . this is fun!)

iuparrothead · Post by **iuparrothead** » November 3, 2004 4:28 pm

bravedave wrote:
iuparrothead wrote: I genuinely believe there is a distinct difference between Clinton's lies and Bush's misrepresentations.

Yeah, Clinton can pronounce and spell "lies"

And he's such a cunning and deceptive snake that he'll make you believe that not only is he telling the truth, but that he's the savior of the free world. (puke

)

iuparrothead · Post by **iuparrothead** » November 3, 2004 4:30 pm

GrannaC wrote:
a1aara wrote:Granna C wrote:

Which is one of the reasons I voted for GWB.
_________________
If you are such a big supporter of W and the war in Iraq, why don't you enlist to fight W's war? Is it ok whenever someone else has to fight or to die?
Because the military won't take grandmothers as new recruits.

The men in my family, however, have stepped up to the plate. My father has a purple heart medal for his efforts in WWII. My brother died overseas during the Vietnam War. My husband is a Vietnam-era veteran. My first husband retired after 22 years in the Air Force. Hell, I'm practically a military groupie. You bet your a$$ I support our Commander-in-Chief and those who are brave enough to fight for our freedoms and our way of life.

Right on Granna!!!

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » November 3, 2004 4:30 pm

Elrod wrote:
And to not allow our goverment to make laws that support or advocate one religion's views. The Bible is clearly anti-gay. But for our goverment to make a law so obviously in support of the Bible's teachings is, IMHO, wrong.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Last I can remember, our country is based on the United States Constitution, not the Bible.
I wasn't around when either document was written, but I've been led to believe that the bible is older than the constitution.

Since the concept of marriage is defined in the bible, should our government be allowed to recognize it?

I would imagine that the Koran also has definitions of marriage (I don't know because I've never read it).

Our government should be separate from any religious teaching. That's precisely why we have the 1st Amendment.Other religious writings exist, I'm sure, that define marriage and are also older than our Constitution but I don't think we'd all want to jump on that bandwagon either.

Fur Play · Post by **Fur Play** » November 3, 2004 4:31 pm

Y'all gon make me lose my mind
Up in heah, Up in heah

PHBeerman · Post by **PHBeerman** » November 3, 2004 4:32 pm

Actually the initiatives were drafted in order to create a definition seperate from any religious ones.

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » November 3, 2004 4:32 pm

ph4ever wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
ph4ever wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
ph4ever wrote:
buffettbride wrote: And to not allow our goverment to make laws that support or advocate one religion's views. The Bible is clearly anti-gay. But for our goverment to make a law so obviously in support of the Bible's teachings is, IMHO, wrong.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Last I can remember, our country is based on the United States Constitution, not the Bible.
Let's get one thing straight here Mallory. You need to read back and you will find out that I am by far means not anti gay. What I have been saying all along is that it's NOT Christians place to judge or condem the gay population. Some of my best oldest and dearest friends are gay in fact.
Oh Connie..I was trying to support your statement further. I agree that it's God's job to judge. I'm all about God judging.
ok my bad. I thought you were thinking that because I was in favor of the Bible's teachings that ment I was anti gay.
Nope.

sorry

No problem. Wanna argue about something else? I think I have a few minutes.

bravedave · Post by **bravedave** » November 3, 2004 4:39 pm

God wrote:
Everyone wrote:
No One wrote:
Someone wrote:
Us wrote:
They wrote:

[/quote][/quote][/quote]

Rodney King · Post by **Rodney King** » November 3, 2004 4:39 pm

Fur Play wrote:Y'all gon make me lose my mind
Up in heah, Up in heah

No shee-yit! You can say that again!

Fur Play · Post by **Fur Play** » November 3, 2004 4:41 pm

Rodney King wrote:
Fur Play wrote:Y'all gon make me lose my mind
Up in heah, Up in heah
No shee-yit! You can say that again!

Y'all gon make me act a fool
Up in heah, Up in heah

Rodney King · Post by **Rodney King** » November 3, 2004 4:43 pm

Fur Play wrote:
Rodney King wrote:
Fur Play wrote:Y'all gon make me lose my mind
Up in heah, Up in heah
No shee-yit! You can say that again!
Y'all gon make me act a fool
Up in heah, Up in heah

Word up!

iuparrothead · Post by **iuparrothead** » November 3, 2004 4:45 pm

Rodney! Fur Play! Quit trying to hi-jack this thread!!!

Fur Play · Post by **Fur Play** » November 3, 2004 4:45 pm

Way de white women at?

ph4ever · Post by **ph4ever** » November 3, 2004 4:50 pm

buffettbride wrote:No problem. Wanna argue about something else? I think I have a few minutes.

nah.....I'll take a raincheck thou

GrannaC · Post by **GrannaC** » November 3, 2004 4:50 pm

iuparrothead wrote:
GrannaC wrote:
a1aara wrote:Granna C wrote:

Which is one of the reasons I voted for GWB.
_________________
If you are such a big supporter of W and the war in Iraq, why don't you enlist to fight W's war? Is it ok whenever someone else has to fight or to die?
Because the military won't take grandmothers as new recruits.

The men in my family, however, have stepped up to the plate. My father has a purple heart medal for his efforts in WWII. My brother died overseas during the Vietnam War. My husband is a Vietnam-era veteran. My first husband retired after 22 years in the Air Force. Hell, I'm practically a military groupie. You bet your a$$ I support our Commander-in-Chief and those who are brave enough to fight for our freedoms and our way of life.
Right on Granna!!!

Oops!! I was replying to posts 5 pages back & the conversation went on without me in another direction.

iuparrothead · Post by **iuparrothead** » November 3, 2004 4:51 pm

GrannaC wrote:
iuparrothead wrote:
GrannaC wrote:
a1aara wrote:Granna C wrote:

Which is one of the reasons I voted for GWB.
_________________
If you are such a big supporter of W and the war in Iraq, why don't you enlist to fight W's war? Is it ok whenever someone else has to fight or to die?
Because the military won't take grandmothers as new recruits.

The men in my family, however, have stepped up to the plate. My father has a purple heart medal for his efforts in WWII. My brother died overseas during the Vietnam War. My husband is a Vietnam-era veteran. My first husband retired after 22 years in the Air Force. Hell, I'm practically a military groupie. You bet your a$$ I support our Commander-in-Chief and those who are brave enough to fight for our freedoms and our way of life.
Right on Granna!!!
Oops!! I was replying to posts 5 pages back & the conversation went on without me in another direction.

No worries! I'm glad you responded to that post!!!

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » November 3, 2004 4:55 pm

ph4ever wrote:
buffettbride wrote:No problem. Wanna argue about something else? I think I have a few minutes.
nah.....I'll take a raincheck thou

You got it.

ph4ever · Post by **ph4ever** » November 3, 2004 4:56 pm

Fur Play wrote:Way de white women at?

that might spark another racist issue - I believe that was earlier. We've proceed from the racist issue thru the God issue and now there's a momentary lull of peace here

give it a few - that too shall pass

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » November 3, 2004 4:58 pm

ph4ever wrote:
Fur Play wrote:Way de white women at?

that might spark another racist issue - I believe that was earlier. We've proceed from the racist issue thru the God issue and now there's a momentary lull of peace here

give it a few - that too shall pass

I think peace should be illegal.

Peace is just wrong.

Key Lime Lee · Post by **Key Lime Lee** » November 3, 2004 4:59 pm

TheSecretsInTheCrust wrote:
Lee,
Respectfully, I don't believe he lied. He may have said things that many people did not agree with and/or did not want to hear.

Assume I give you the benefit of the doubt on Iraq... which is tough considering that there was a vocal majority that didn't agree with what the president said at the time - hard to claim you're mislead when a good portion of the world is telling you at the time that you're wrong.

But, in just one example, I watched him say that John Kerry would entrust the defense our country to foreign governments. That was a lie.

I watched him say that Kerry would be "sensitive to terrorists." That was a lie.

Those were just during the campaign.... but there were numerous instances where what he said wasn't true.

Maybe most folks don't care or think it's okay... I'm not sure.