Jimmy Buffett discussion
https://www.buffettnews.com/forum/
Apparently you havea1aara wrote:aperently you've had no luck at picking a fight on this board today
And he's such a cunning and deceptive snake that he'll make you believe that not only is he telling the truth, but that he's the savior of the free world. (pukebravedave wrote:iuparrothead wrote: I genuinely believe there is a distinct difference between Clinton's lies and Bush's misrepresentations.
Yeah, Clinton can pronounce and spell "lies"
)Right on Granna!!!GrannaC wrote:a1aara wrote:Granna C wrote:
Which is one of the reasons I voted for GWB.
_________________
If you are such a big supporter of W and the war in Iraq, why don't you enlist to fight W's war? Is it ok whenever someone else has to fight or to die?Because the military won't take grandmothers as new recruits.
The men in my family, however, have stepped up to the plate. My father has a purple heart medal for his efforts in WWII. My brother died overseas during the Vietnam War. My husband is a Vietnam-era veteran. My first husband retired after 22 years in the Air Force. Hell, I'm practically a military groupie. You bet your a$$ I support our Commander-in-Chief and those who are brave enough to fight for our freedoms and our way of life.
I would imagine that the Koran also has definitions of marriage (I don't know because I've never read it).Elrod wrote:I wasn't around when either document was written, but I've been led to believe that the bible is older than the constitution.And to not allow our goverment to make laws that support or advocate one religion's views. The Bible is clearly anti-gay. But for our goverment to make a law so obviously in support of the Bible's teachings is, IMHO, wrong.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Last I can remember, our country is based on the United States Constitution, not the Bible.
Since the concept of marriage is defined in the bible, should our government be allowed to recognize it?
No problem. Wanna argue about something else? I think I have a few minutes.ph4ever wrote:buffettbride wrote:Nope.ph4ever wrote:ok my bad. I thought you were thinking that because I was in favor of the Bible's teachings that ment I was anti gay.buffettbride wrote:Oh Connie..I was trying to support your statement further. I agree that it's God's job to judge. I'm all about God judging.ph4ever wrote:Let's get one thing straight here Mallory. You need to read back and you will find out that I am by far means not anti gay. What I have been saying all along is that it's NOT Christians place to judge or condem the gay population. Some of my best oldest and dearest friends are gay in fact.buffettbride wrote: And to not allow our goverment to make laws that support or advocate one religion's views. The Bible is clearly anti-gay. But for our goverment to make a law so obviously in support of the Bible's teachings is, IMHO, wrong.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Last I can remember, our country is based on the United States Constitution, not the Bible.
sorry
[/quote][/quote][/quote]God wrote:Everyone wrote:No One wrote:Someone wrote:Us wrote:They wrote:
No shee-yit! You can say that again!Fur Play wrote:Y'all gon make me lose my mind
Up in heah, Up in heah
Y'all gon make me act a foolRodney King wrote:No shee-yit! You can say that again!Fur Play wrote:Y'all gon make me lose my mind
Up in heah, Up in heah
Word up!Fur Play wrote:Y'all gon make me act a foolRodney King wrote:No shee-yit! You can say that again!Fur Play wrote:Y'all gon make me lose my mind
Up in heah, Up in heah
Up in heah, Up in heah
nah.....I'll take a raincheck thoubuffettbride wrote:No problem. Wanna argue about something else? I think I have a few minutes.
Oops!! I was replying to posts 5 pages back & the conversation went on without me in another direction.iuparrothead wrote:Right on Granna!!!GrannaC wrote:a1aara wrote:Granna C wrote:
Which is one of the reasons I voted for GWB.
_________________
If you are such a big supporter of W and the war in Iraq, why don't you enlist to fight W's war? Is it ok whenever someone else has to fight or to die?
The men in my family, however, have stepped up to the plate. My father has a purple heart medal for his efforts in WWII. My brother died overseas during the Vietnam War. My husband is a Vietnam-era veteran. My first husband retired after 22 years in the Air Force. Hell, I'm practically a military groupie. You bet your a$$ I support our Commander-in-Chief and those who are brave enough to fight for our freedoms and our way of life.
No worries! I'm glad you responded to that post!!!GrannaC wrote:Oops!! I was replying to posts 5 pages back & the conversation went on without me in another direction.iuparrothead wrote:Right on Granna!!!GrannaC wrote:a1aara wrote:Granna C wrote:
Which is one of the reasons I voted for GWB.
_________________
If you are such a big supporter of W and the war in Iraq, why don't you enlist to fight W's war? Is it ok whenever someone else has to fight or to die?
The men in my family, however, have stepped up to the plate. My father has a purple heart medal for his efforts in WWII. My brother died overseas during the Vietnam War. My husband is a Vietnam-era veteran. My first husband retired after 22 years in the Air Force. Hell, I'm practically a military groupie. You bet your a$$ I support our Commander-in-Chief and those who are brave enough to fight for our freedoms and our way of life.
You got it.ph4ever wrote:nah.....I'll take a raincheck thoubuffettbride wrote:No problem. Wanna argue about something else? I think I have a few minutes.
Fur Play wrote:Way de white women at?
I think peace should be illegal.ph4ever wrote:Fur Play wrote:Way de white women at?
that might spark another racist issue - I believe that was earlier. We've proceed from the racist issue thru the God issue and now there's a momentary lull of peace here
give it a few - that too shall pass
Peace is just wrong.Assume I give you the benefit of the doubt on Iraq... which is tough considering that there was a vocal majority that didn't agree with what the president said at the time - hard to claim you're mislead when a good portion of the world is telling you at the time that you're wrong.TheSecretsInTheCrust wrote:
Lee,
Respectfully, I don't believe he lied. He may have said things that many people did not agree with and/or did not want to hear.
