Y-No-9-No wrote:To follow up that comment: Unless YOU are personally related to either side of this family or are part of HER medical team, YOU don't know squat. You are just spouting venom and hyperbole (especially if you are an elected official). I am not saying that you do not have a right to YOUR beliefs, I am saying that you do not have a right to MY beliefs. Executing a person (with a bullet rather than removing the tube) who does not agree with your narrow view of what is the sanctity of life is not a very plausible rallying cry. That's like someone from PETA wearing leather and saying "fur hurts".
And pardon me for not agreeing with YOUR narrow view of the sanctity of life.
So if Terry Schaivo should die, wouldn't it BE more humane to execute her by putting a bullet in her rather than removing her feeding tube and letting her die a slow, merciless death? Sorry, I don't think killing innocent people as a matter of convenience shows any compassion.
Her only mistake in life was choosing a scumbag for a husband. You can't tell me he isn't thinking about any financial gains he'd receive when she dies.
The c-sucker has been living with ANOTHER WOMAN for HOW many years now? And has two children by her?
Divorce her-let the PARENTS take care of her if that's what they want, and let Mr. S.O.B. go screw Little Orpan Annie, if he so choosed. It's NOT that difficult to comprehend.
No, I don't necassarily want to execute him by putting a bullet in him either, but you know what? It would really make my day to catch him driving 35 M.P.H. in a 25 M.P.H. zone in my jurisdiction.