MJ Verdict!

12vmanRick · Post by **12vmanRick** » June 13, 2005 5:20 pm

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!!

There are people in jail all over for WAY LESS accusations of child molestation than he had against him!!!

If it was me or you, we'd be screwed!!!!

pbans · Post by **pbans** » June 13, 2005 5:20 pm

Wow....don't really even know what to say.

MojosMama · Post by **MojosMama** » June 13, 2005 5:20 pm

pbans wrote:Wow....don't really even know what to say.

How about money talks, and justice can be bought and sold?

ToplessRideFL · Post by **ToplessRideFL** » June 13, 2005 5:22 pm

Big Red Parrothead wrote:He walks.

Not guilty on all charges.

Was never a doubt in my mind....... not that I know if he should have been quilty or not...I just didnt think he'd be found guilty.

12vmanRick · Post by **12vmanRick** » June 13, 2005 5:22 pm

MojosMama wrote:
pbans wrote:Wow....don't really even know what to say.
How about money talks, and justice can be bought and sold?

OJ Simpson all over again!

pbans · Post by **pbans** » June 13, 2005 5:22 pm

MojosMama wrote:
pbans wrote:Wow....don't really even know what to say.
How about money talks, and justice can be bought and sold?

So glad they were able to convict Martha Stewart and let this piece of s*** walk.....I know I'll sleep better. I'm just sad about it....

ejr · Post by **ejr** » June 13, 2005 5:23 pm

When this went to jury, this is what I thought the verdict would be. While I believe he is guilty of at least some of these charges, it was not that strong a prosecution case.

When i sat on a murder trial jury, our discussion was not about guilt or innocence, but was about proof.

iuparrothead · Post by **iuparrothead** » June 13, 2005 5:24 pm

On all charges!?!?

hmmmm....

ToplessRideFL · Post by **ToplessRideFL** » June 13, 2005 5:24 pm

ejr wrote:When this went to jury, this is what I thought the verdict would be. While I believe he is guilty of at least some of these charges, it was not that strong a prosecution case.

When i sat on a murder trial jury, our discussion was not about guilt or innocence, but was about proof.

yep....reasonably sure beyond a shadow of a doubt......

Alan11 · Post by **Alan11** » June 13, 2005 5:25 pm

This just in Michael Jackson is still a freak show innocent or not

sailingagain · Post by **sailingagain** » June 13, 2005 5:26 pm

Two things that bother me.

1. He setlled in previous cases. WHY? If I was accused of molesting a child and had the $$ to fight it, I would NEVER settle. I'd fight it to the death if I was innocent.

2. Why didn't he testify? If I'm innocent, they can't trip me up and I have nothing to hide. I'd be so vocal against it. I'd be itching to take the stand.

12vmanRick · Post by **12vmanRick** » June 13, 2005 5:36 pm

it's apparent that they could have caught him in bed with those boys, had pictures and that was about all that was missing anyway and he would have still be let go!!!! that jury was NOT wanting to put a STAR of his caliber in jail!

MA_Buffett_Fan23 · Post by **MA_Buffett_Fan23** » June 13, 2005 7:20 pm

UN FLIPPIN' BELIEVABLE...

BahamaBreeze · Post by **BahamaBreeze** » June 13, 2005 7:26 pm

I thought for sure that he would be found guilty with the "booze" charge.

The thing that casts a shadow of doubt was that mom! She has always been out for money, and even told her boys to lie under oath in her case about her back injury. If the boy would have had a "regular" mom, I don't think MJ would have walked.

And if she would have been a "real" mom, the boy would have never spent the night there in the first place.

Wino you know · Post by **Wino you know** » June 13, 2005 8:50 pm

THAT'S CALIFORNIA FOR YOU!!!

Too bad the jury wasn't one of 12 REAL good people. (a.k.a. REDNECKS!)

GOD, how I HATE that walking FREAK SHOW!

sonofabeach · Post by **sonofabeach** » June 13, 2005 11:44 pm

Do I think he's molested kids? yes
Did they prove it? no, according to the jury.
The boy's mom was Jacko's best defense.

ragtopW · Post by **ragtopW** » June 13, 2005 11:48 pm

sonofabeach wrote:Do I think he's molested kids? yes
Did they prove it? no, according to the jury.
The boy's mom was Jacko's best defense.

and by all rights we should treat him as not guilty

not what I think at all, just the way it was set up to be..

ToplessRideFL · Post by **ToplessRideFL** » June 14, 2005 12:02 am

Like it or not phrends.... the justice system is in place. Unlike many places... we are innocent until a court of law determines that we aren't. We obviously agree with our system or we would live in another country.....

In America of course, the media and public find you guilty even when the court disproves it. I am not taking sides in the MJ case..... just to point out once again...that the jury was obviously not without reasonable doubt.

Michael Jackson knows what he did or didnt do. He must look himself in the mirror. No matter how we see him......

LIPH · Post by **LIPH** » June 14, 2005 8:14 am

The jury in this case must have been chosen on a Friday.

nycparrothead · Post by **nycparrothead** » June 14, 2005 8:15 am

MA_Buffett_Fan23 wrote:UN FLIPPIN' BELIEVABLE...

Potty mouth!!!