For anyone interested in on-line dating

land_shark3 · Post by **land_shark3** » July 12, 2005 9:50 am

http://www.truedater.com/

The morning radio show I listen to mentioned this site this morning. People rate the people they have met on on-line dating sites. Is that picture really the person behind the screen name? Just enter the screen name and the website and see if they are rated. Or do like me and just browse through the ratings to see who got busted.

DonnaKayDunbar · Post by **DonnaKayDunbar** » July 12, 2005 9:52 am

link doesn't go anywhere.

land_shark3 · Post by **land_shark3** » July 12, 2005 10:41 am

DonnaKayDunbar wrote:link doesn't go anywhere.

Oops, put an "s" where there wasn't one. Now it should work.

DonnaKayDunbar · Post by **DonnaKayDunbar** » July 12, 2005 10:41 am

land_shark3 wrote:
DonnaKayDunbar wrote:link doesn't go anywhere.
Oops, put an "s" where there wasn't one. Now it should work.

I'm just curious (morbidly) to see what kind of lies people tell for online dating.

sy · Post by sy » July 12, 2005 10:52 am

My favorites so far:

He does NOT make 100,000-150,000 per year. His stated "3 kids" is really 4 kids. And 3 of those wont speak to him. <...>

Nasty talker ,no intellect or values looking for Persian virgins only...

DonnaKayDunbar · Post by **DonnaKayDunbar** » July 12, 2005 11:12 am

There's some funny crap in there.

Crzy · Post by **Crzy** » July 12, 2005 12:25 pm

I still cannot get it to work.... hmmm

sonofabeach · Post by **sonofabeach** » July 12, 2005 12:43 pm

DonnaKayDunbar wrote:
land_shark3 wrote:
DonnaKayDunbar wrote:link doesn't go anywhere.
Oops, put an "s" where there wasn't one. Now it should work.
I'm just curious (morbidly) to see what kind of lies people tell for online dating.

prolly not the same kind we tell for online Buffett chat

HsvParrothead · Post by **HsvParrothead** » July 12, 2005 12:44 pm

The pictures this person chooses to use are at least 5-6yrs old and time has not been good to her.

And when you click on the profile... it's unavailable because it's being "edited"