Clear Channel pushing for indecency regulations on satellite

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » July 13, 2005 3:23 pm

1. How many posts do we think each other would have if there were no arguments on BN?
2. How bored do you think we would be?
3. I'm hungry.

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » July 13, 2005 3:23 pm

LIPH wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
LIPH wrote:Nice play on my name,
You mean that's not what the "PH" stands for, Larry? Well, color me shocked.
It actually stands for pin head. That's not really me in my avatar, in real life I look like this.

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » July 13, 2005 3:24 pm

I'm listening to a Clear Channel station, and guess what, it sucks!

rednekkPH · Post by **rednekkPH** » July 13, 2005 3:26 pm

Ilph wrote:1. How many posts do we think each other would have if there were no arguments on BN?
2. How bored do you think we would be?
3. I'm hungry.

1. 6
2. Quite.
3. Mmmm...food.

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » July 13, 2005 3:41 pm

rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:1. How many posts do we think each other would have if there were no arguments on BN?
2. How bored do you think we would be?
3. I'm hungry.
1. 6
2. Quite.
3. Mmmm...food.

Yes, all correct. You win pie.

buffettbride · Post by **buffettbride** » July 13, 2005 3:42 pm

Ilph wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:1. How many posts do we think each other would have if there were no arguments on BN?
2. How bored do you think we would be?
3. I'm hungry.
1. 6
2. Quite.
3. Mmmm...food.
Yes, all correct. You win pie.

Mmmmmmmmm. Pie.

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » July 13, 2005 3:46 pm

buffettbride wrote:
Ilph wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:1. How many posts do we think each other would have if there were no arguments on BN?
2. How bored do you think we would be?
3. I'm hungry.
1. 6
2. Quite.
3. Mmmm...food.
Yes, all correct. You win pie.
Mmmmmmmmm. Pie.

Thank you. This contest has been sponsored by your local Clear Channel station.

rednekkPH · Post by **rednekkPH** » July 13, 2005 3:47 pm

Ilph wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:1. How many posts do we think each other would have if there were no arguments on BN?
2. How bored do you think we would be?
3. I'm hungry.
1. 6
2. Quite.
3. Mmmm...food.
Yes, all correct. You win pie.

Is this remastered pie, complete with all original packaging and maybe even bonus filling? Could you possibly copy and paste a series of worthless articles about this pie?

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » July 13, 2005 3:51 pm

rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:1. How many posts do we think each other would have if there were no arguments on BN?
2. How bored do you think we would be?
3. I'm hungry.
1. 6
2. Quite.
3. Mmmm...food.
Yes, all correct. You win pie.
Is this remastered pie, complete with all original packaging and maybe even bonus filling? Could you possibly copy and paste a series of worthless articles about this pie?

Maybe if I have time later. I'm busy making witty and insightful comments now.

rednekkPH · Post by **rednekkPH** » July 13, 2005 3:52 pm

Ilph wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:1. How many posts do we think each other would have if there were no arguments on BN?
2. How bored do you think we would be?
3. I'm hungry.
1. 6
2. Quite.
3. Mmmm...food.
Yes, all correct. You win pie.
Is this remastered pie, complete with all original packaging and maybe even bonus filling? Could you possibly copy and paste a series of worthless articles about this pie?
Maybe if I have time later. I'm busy making witty and insightful comments now.

so

LIPH · Post by **LIPH** » July 13, 2005 3:53 pm

rednekkPH wrote:Is this remastered pie, complete with all original packaging and maybe even bonus filling? Could you possibly copy and paste a series of worthless articles about this pie?

I'm afraid to ask.

RinglingRingling · Post by **RinglingRingling** » July 13, 2005 3:53 pm

rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:1. How many posts do we think each other would have if there were no arguments on BN?
2. How bored do you think we would be?
3. I'm hungry.
1. 6
2. Quite.
3. Mmmm...food.
Yes, all correct. You win pie.
Is this remastered pie, complete with all original packaging and maybe even bonus filling? Could you possibly copy and paste a series of worthless articles about this pie?

Bonus filling is always good.

Cubbie Bear · Post by **Cubbie Bear** » July 13, 2005 3:54 pm

Somebody could use a slice of "Humble Pie"

Parrot Monkey · Post by **Parrot Monkey** » July 13, 2005 3:55 pm

The selective arrogance continues …

There’s no such thing as a worthless article. An article you might or might not want to read at the time, yes, but there’s always at least someone here who does have interest in the articles posted. So, their not worthless.

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » July 13, 2005 3:57 pm

rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:1. How many posts do we think each other would have if there were no arguments on BN?
2. How bored do you think we would be?
3. I'm hungry.
1. 6
2. Quite.
3. Mmmm...food.
Yes, all correct. You win pie.
Is this remastered pie, complete with all original packaging and maybe even bonus filling? Could you possibly copy and paste a series of worthless articles about this pie?
Maybe if I have time later. I'm busy making witty and insightful comments now.
so

You're lucky I don't like to type more than 14 words at a time.

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » July 13, 2005 3:57 pm

RinglingRingling wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:
Ilph wrote:1. How many posts do we think each other would have if there were no arguments on BN?
2. How bored do you think we would be?
3. I'm hungry.
1. 6
2. Quite.
3. Mmmm...food.
Yes, all correct. You win pie.
Is this remastered pie, complete with all original packaging and maybe even bonus filling? Could you possibly copy and paste a series of worthless articles about this pie?
Bonus filling is always good.

That's what she said.

LIPH · Post by **LIPH** » July 13, 2005 3:58 pm

Cubbie Bear wrote:Somebody could use a slice of "Humble Pie"

PHBeerman · Post by **PHBeerman** » July 13, 2005 4:13 pm

Parrot Monkey wrote:The selective arrogance continues …

There’s no such thing as a worthless article. An article you might or might not want to read at the time, yes, but there’s always at least someone here who does have interest in the articles posted. So, their not worthless.

You could have stopped there.

Jahfin · Post by **Jahfin** » July 13, 2005 4:14 pm

Jahfin wrote:
LongIslandPeckerHead wrote:
Parrot Monkey wrote:If he didn’t have any interest in reading it or really didn’t feel like talking about Clear Channel, nobody made him enter the thread in the first place.

LongIslandPeckerHead wrote:I'll ask again, since jahfin felt the need to speak for you before.
I'm speaking for no one other than myself when I say just follow this thread back to page one and see how it's devolved into another unwarranted attack on Parrot Monkey and a hijacking of it's original subject matter. All completely uncalled for but you will all keep whining no matter what anyone says or does so what's the use? All I know is, your actions speak for themselves.
As do yours.

Nice play on my name, especially since I've never, let me repeat that, NEVER altered your screen name in any of my posts. Maybe I should whine incessantly about it now, or report it to a moderator. Or tack it up to the hypocrisy of one of the posters on this board.

So

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » July 13, 2005 4:15 pm

Jahfin wrote:
Jahfin wrote:
LongIslandPeckerHead wrote:
Parrot Monkey wrote:If he didn’t have any interest in reading it or really didn’t feel like talking about Clear Channel, nobody made him enter the thread in the first place.

LongIslandPeckerHead wrote:I'll ask again, since jahfin felt the need to speak for you before.
I'm speaking for no one other than myself when I say just follow this thread back to page one and see how it's devolved into another unwarranted attack on Parrot Monkey and a hijacking of it's original subject matter. All completely uncalled for but you will all keep whining no matter what anyone says or does so what's the use? All I know is, your actions speak for themselves.
As do yours.

Nice play on my name, especially since I've never, let me repeat that, NEVER altered your screen name in any of my posts. Maybe I should whine incessantly about it now, or report it to a moderator. Or tack it up to the hypocrisy of one of the posters on this board.
So

That's funny, right there. I don't care who you are.