BuffettNews.com

rednekkPH wrote:

Parrot Monkey wrote:When I posted about the reissue deal subsequent times, it was due to new research on other back catalogue situations, not p*** everyone off ...

Oh, so that was just an added bonus for ya?

No, that was something you and the selected others brought upon yourselves with your whole damn pessimistic/"Who cares" view of the whole thing.

Fellow BNers should really worry more about their own actions, and less about dictating what other BNers should or shouldn't post, including frequency, unless it is in violation of board rules.

Mutual respect is also appreciated, as is exercising the right to not say anything, if there is nothing nice to say.

Tiki's new name.......

KINDERGARTEN COP

Sorry, I try, but I about had enough of Ringling's crap...

Cubbie Bear wrote:Tiki's new name.......

KINDERGARTEN COP

"It might be a tumour"

"Idds nadduh tumuh"

RinglingRingling wrote:

If you disagree then you need to direct those comments to phjim, not me. All you're doing at this point is showing what a bellyacher you are.

not exactly...

If you think your constant crying is going to stop me from posting articles then you're wasting your time. A decision was made a long time ago about that, either learn to accept that decision or quit your whining. The decision is up to you.

Sam wrote:I did say usually around 10 F.. Also the type of surface will cause temperature variations ....... such as cool deck around pools or if had been steel or asphalt or desert floor or even grass in one's yard, or what not.

No problem. I wasn't trying to dispute what you said, I was just saying it was different in this instance.

Sam wrote:What part of Carolina are you from? I have a sister near Wilmington....

I'm also on the coast.

Jahfin wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

If you disagree then you need to direct those comments to phjim, not me. All you're doing at this point is showing what a bellyacher you are.

not exactly...

If you think your constant crying is going to stop me from posting articles then you're wasting your time. A decision was made a long time ago about that, either learn to accept that decision or quit your whining. The decision is up to you.

Shoot son.. post as much as you want... who said I wanted you to stop?

Jahfin wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

If you disagree then you need to direct those comments to phjim, not me. All you're doing at this point is showing what a bellyacher you are.

not exactly...

If you think your constant crying is going to stop me from posting articles then you're wasting your time. A decision was made a long time ago about that, either learn to accept that decision or quit your whining. The decision is up to you.

If you don't feed the fire, chances are, it'll die.

sy wrote:

Jahfin wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

If you disagree then you need to direct those comments to phjim, not me. All you're doing at this point is showing what a bellyacher you are.

not exactly...

If you think your constant crying is going to stop me from posting articles then you're wasting your time. A decision was made a long time ago about that, either learn to accept that decision or quit your whining. The decision is up to you.

If you don't feed the fire, chances are, it'll die.

hush. I'm having fun here...

sy wrote:

Jahfin wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

If you disagree then you need to direct those comments to phjim, not me. All you're doing at this point is showing what a bellyacher you are.

not exactly...

If you think your constant crying is going to stop me from posting articles then you're wasting your time. A decision was made a long time ago about that, either learn to accept that decision or quit your whining. The decision is up to you.

If you don't feed the fire, chances are, it'll die.

That works both ways. If Ringling, Ringling would shut up then none of us would have to tolerate his never ending crybaby tactics. Chances are that isn't going to happen though. Apparently he's starved for attention.

RinglingRingling wrote:

sy wrote:

Jahfin wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

If you disagree then you need to direct those comments to phjim, not me. All you're doing at this point is showing what a bellyacher you are.

not exactly...

If you think your constant crying is going to stop me from posting articles then you're wasting your time. A decision was made a long time ago about that, either learn to accept that decision or quit your whining. The decision is up to you.

If you don't feed the fire, chances are, it'll die.

hush. I'm having fun here...

Yes dear

Jahfin wrote:

sy wrote:

Jahfin wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

If you disagree then you need to direct those comments to phjim, not me. All you're doing at this point is showing what a bellyacher you are.

not exactly...

If you think your constant crying is going to stop me from posting articles then you're wasting your time. A decision was made a long time ago about that, either learn to accept that decision or quit your whining. The decision is up to you.

If you don't feed the fire, chances are, it'll die.

That works both ways. If Ringling, Ringling would shut up then none of us would have to tolerate his never ending crybaby tactics. Chances are that isn't going to happen though. Apparently he's starved for attention.

Jah, Jah... wipe your tears away. It'll be ok. really. If it gets too bad, you could just put on the Drive-by Truckers CD and turn the volume way up...

Bingo!!!!!

Jahfin wrote:If Ringling, Ringling would shut up then none of us would have to tolerate his never ending crybaby tactics. Chances are that isn't going to happen though. Apparently he's starved for attention.

If you think he's starved for attention then why do you feel the need to respond to almost every one of his posts? Isn't that just playing right into his hands? Logic, it's a wonderful thing.

hmmm... how to word this??

I'm going to use buffettbride as an example since she's not around to defend herself!!

I also think if someone chooses to fixate on certain topics and bring them up time and time again, that they should expect and accept good natured ribbing and teasing about said topic: ie Sporks

And if someone chooses to post multiple threads of similar nature, yet different topics time and time again, that they should expect and accept good natured ribbing and teasing about said behavior: ie Polls

LIPH wrote:

Jahfin wrote:If Ringling, Ringling would shut up then none of us would have to tolerate his never ending crybaby tactics. Chances are that isn't going to happen though. Apparently he's starved for attention.

If you think he's starved for attention then why do you feel the need to respond to almost every one of his posts? Isn't that just playing right into his hands? Logic, it's a wonderful thing.

I figured one of you would try to figure out some way to place blame elsewhere just as you always do. Why doesn't he just stop complaining to start with? That's the solution to the problem, not me or anyone else replying to his posts. It's not like he's going to get me or others to stop posting articles (a topic that was worn into the ground a long time ago) or Parrot Monkey from continuing his campaign to get Buffett's back catalog remastered, so what's the use in him constantly complaining about it?

RinglingRingling wrote:

Jahfin wrote:

sy wrote:

Jahfin wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

If you disagree then you need to direct those comments to phjim, not me. All you're doing at this point is showing what a bellyacher you are.

not exactly...

If you think your constant crying is going to stop me from posting articles then you're wasting your time. A decision was made a long time ago about that, either learn to accept that decision or quit your whining. The decision is up to you.

If you don't feed the fire, chances are, it'll die.

That works both ways. If Ringling, Ringling would shut up then none of us would have to tolerate his never ending crybaby tactics. Chances are that isn't going to happen though. Apparently he's starved for attention.

Jah, Jah... wipe your tears away. It'll be ok. really. If it gets too bad, you could just put on the Drive-by Truckers CD and turn the volume way up...

I'm not the one that keeps on whining like a little fricking baby just because no one kowtows to me. Quit complaining and I'll quit replying. Simple as that. The decision is up to you.

Tiki Bar wrote:hmmm... how to word this??

I'm going to use buffettbride as an example since she's not around to defend herself!!

I also think if someone chooses to fixate on certain topics and bring them up time and time again, that they should expect and accept good natured ribbing and teasing about said topic: ie Sporks

And if someone chooses to post multiple threads of similar nature, yet different topics time and time again, that they should expect and accept good natured ribbing and teasing about said behavior: ie Polls

Why not just ban Ringling, Ringling and the others that can't accept the fact that phjim approved the posting of articles long ago and that'll solve the problem right there.

LIPH wrote:If you think he's starved for attention then why do you feel the need to respond to almost every one of his posts? Isn't that just playing right into his hands? Logic, it's a wonderful thing.

Man, that’s just so stupid. You two are so dependent on the synergy of the clique aren’t you that you just lost all individuality, which comes with loss of your own opinions. If you’ll both just take the time to pull your heads out of your own, I think you’ll come to realize what an ass your “buddy” Ringling is being.