sy wrote:Sam wrote:Considering she was an elderly grandmother..... she
probably just told him to get what he wanted or never looked at it and has limited no knowledge of computers nor understood what it all meant.
I don't know about the suing part of this.......I do think "Hollywood" and the writers and producers, etc of such games do need to be held accountable and liable.... Killing cops??? abusing women??? stealing cars??? I am afraid to consider what next depraved low and beyond that they are going to sink too.
This should serve as a "WAKE-UP" call and teach them to be more responsible and adult about what they create and produce. HOW-SO-EVER
They have had many WAKE-UP calls.......that they continue to ignore.
THis is not about being extreme, it is just about being responsible...Do we want people killing cops and abusing women??? Before it was slaying monsters and daemons and such........ We have people protesting hunting games and safari games that kill virtual animals and endangered species.....yet not many are protesting this game that teaches killing of cops and battery of women....

But see, this is where parently responsibility comes in. I own that game, as I own many other games I would never put in the hands of children. Many of the people I work with and I play together. It is fun, to us. Not one of us would put it in the hands of their children. I believe that it is not the responsibility of the companies to stop producing mature products that are unsuitable for children, because there is no reason for that. If a game, movie, or album is rated mature for adult themes, then that's pretty obvious that it is not for children. There are video games out there based completely on how many women you can sleep with and how well you can seduce them, there are bloody, gory games, tons of them. They are all labelled mature and not for sale to minors.
I believe it all comes back to parents blaming society for the way their children turn out when it's their responsibility to bring them up and educate them.
This is just my opinion, and is in no way directed to anyone in particular, and is certainly not in any way trashing any of your comment, Sam.

No problem...
A few points of order though, if you will allow.
The game WAS NOT marketed nor described as being for adults. If it had been then that would different.
The makers of the game have admitted they knew the content was in the game for some time now.
I agree with you about the games with realistic gore and what not. They are marketed as such so a person can clearly tell them....
I do hold makers and marketers of games and movies glorifying such conduct to be at least partly responsible, after all they did create and market it. Don't get me wrong,...I am not a prude...but I do believe in GIGO ( Garbage In, Garbage Out) and the majority of things on tv are nothing but GIGO...There is very little I find of interest on tv or coming out of Hollywood to be of interest.
You have played the game....I have not.
This particular game may well be fun and interesting to adults....it is a far cry from RPG slaying monsters or space aliens.
I can see a use for say a game about al Qaeda to be used for contingency planning and training of appropriate personel. Like it or not the games can or do teach tactics and stradegy...to a certain extent anyway, and I hope no police officer ever gets injured or killed or no woman ever gets beaten raped and abused or someone gets killed or carjacked because some weakminded geek got it into his head that he wanted to apply or try it in real life...and be the next "Scarface" or whatever...
I just don't like the idea of the idea of a game where stealing cars and killing cops and beating/raping women. Is it ok for adults...??? That is their choice to make.... not many adults that play the game would ever think of doing such in realife anyway, and are not as easily impressed as some teens are.... We already know that teens get alcohol from somewhere .......and no doubt they get all kinds of other things and contraband as well,...bootlegging a game would be "childs play" for them...That is my opinion...
The grandmother was/is 84 years old. I feel she probably had no or little idea about the game or it's content or about computers in general, and wanted to give her grandson something he wanted.
No mention of the kid's parents have been made. Are they in the military and in Iraq or elsewhere? At work??? Are they divorced /separated? Alive? In prison? Where were/are they?
In this day and age it is not unusal, for a parent not to be home,...with the neccessity of two incomes, both are usually working, leaving alot of free time for the keets... So while it is the parents responsibility to monitor their keet....it is not always possible.
Keets are individuals. I don't blame all of society on their outcome good or bad, but no doubt the exposure they give to an impressionable mind will have some effect .... it maybe good and it may be bad....it depends on the individual....
Parents do the best they can to raise a child properly...no one knows how he or she will turn out until the keet becomes an adult and decides for him or herself. HOPEFULLY the parents intilled the right things and the keet will be capable of making the right decisions...
Again I blame the creators and the marketers...they clearly knew what the product was and they created it....I dunno if the grandmother should neccessarily be suing though.....but something must be done....
We have one of the greatest learning and entertaining and educational tools in the world...The whole world at our fingertips.... Just what are we teaching with it??? Killing cops, stealing cars, beating/raping women is acceptable and fun????
