Corporatized Album Covers

Jahfin · Post by **Jahfin** » August 2, 2005 12:07 pm

Click here:

http://ilx.p3r.net/thread.php?msgid=5942033

land_shark3 · Post by **land_shark3** » August 2, 2005 12:20 pm

RinglingRingling · Post by **RinglingRingling** » August 2, 2005 12:22 pm

land_shark3 wrote:

wow, Britney looks a lot less curvey then than she does now.

land_shark3 · Post by **land_shark3** » August 2, 2005 12:24 pm

RinglingRingling wrote:
land_shark3 wrote:
wow, Britney looks a lot less curvey then than she does now.

Must be the Adobe sponsorship.

RinglingRingling · Post by **RinglingRingling** » August 2, 2005 12:28 pm

land_shark3 wrote:
RinglingRingling wrote:
land_shark3 wrote:
wow, Britney looks a lot less curvey then than she does now.
Must be the Adobe sponsorship.

probably true. They are showing her "Live in MIA" concert on Showtime, and she was looking a lot thicker there than the cover (during the first 3 minutes that I watched..

)

Jahfin · Post by **Jahfin** » August 2, 2005 12:36 pm

RinglingRingling wrote:wow, Britney looks a lot less curvey then than she does now.

This site might help answer that:

http://www.liquidgeneration.com/poptoon ... reasts.asp

Ilph · Post by **Ilph** » August 3, 2005 7:28 pm

phjrsaunt · Post by **phjrsaunt** » August 3, 2005 7:37 pm

All I can think of when I see this is some kind of cross between a Pamela Anderson wannabe and the character that Tina Turner played in one of the Mad Max movies. This thought is not a "good" thing, mind you.