Page 4 of 6

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:06 pm
by buffettbride
Jahfin wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote:
Very telling how you took such offense to PM's comments when he never even mentioned your name throughout the course of his response.
He didn't have to. We ALL knew what he was talking about. :roll: :roll:
I don't think that's the case at all especially since you aren't the only one that's taken the "cheese, spork, etc." route in the past.
buffettbride wrote:And what exactly did it tell you?
It looks as though you've already answered that.

In hopes that this thread doesn't escalate into another useless p*** contest, I understand the reasoning behind the "cheese" posts but I'd much rather see the subject matter hashed out among all the respective parties rather than see someone try to do what they percieve to be "diffusing" the situation by resorting to such ridiculous nonsense as replying with "cheese" comments.
And my point was I haven't diffused anyone's (namely yours or PMs) anything with cheese. Y'all asked us to stop harping on the liner notes, but then it's OK to bring up bunched panties and cheese in a way to backhandedly insult?

I agree this shouldn't turn into a p*** match, Jah, but this really has GOT to be a two way street.
I agree but no one named names when it came to the "cheese" comments, by stepping forward and taking credit for it you made yourself guilty by association when you're not the only one that's made those kinds of comments in the past.
I don't recall denying my cheese input and I don't mind standing up for my cheese. I'm not guilty of anything because cheese is not a crime.

You said so yourself a few weeks ago you're making the effort and so have I...by NOT cheesing things that do not wish to be cheesed. So to have it brought up in such a way by PM in the same way others rib at his liner notes was quite offensive considering the whole peace thing we had goin' on here, and of all the things to rib at, he picked ones I primarily joke about in a thread (this one) I had not even participated in.

So, if it's OK for PM to make fun of ME I'm sure as hell gonna interject cheese where I want.

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:06 pm
by Tiki Bar
"p*** away again in Margaritaville..."

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:06 pm
by 7lords
Jahfin wrote:I agree but no one named names when it came to the "cheese" comments, by stepping forward and taking credit for it you made yourself guilty by association when you're not the only one that's made those kinds of comments in the past.
I used to see your side on some issues - you're making it harder and harder :roll:

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:07 pm
by buffettbride
And with that, I'm done Jah.

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:07 pm
by AlbatrossFlyer
Jahfin wrote:That was only part of the question
no, hawkfan369 posed the following question:
what is Jimmy's taping policy?
others decided to change the topic to a "why doesn't jimmy allow taping" thread.

until i posted my first response, no other poster answered his question.

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:07 pm
by CaptainP
It never ends, does it? :roll:

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:07 pm
by Jahfin
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote:
Very telling how you took such offense to PM's comments when he never even mentioned your name throughout the course of his response.
He didn't have to. We ALL knew what he was talking about. :roll: :roll:
I don't think that's the case at all especially since you aren't the only one that's taken the "cheese, spork, etc." route in the past.
buffettbride wrote:And what exactly did it tell you?
It looks as though you've already answered that.

In hopes that this thread doesn't escalate into another useless p*** contest, I understand the reasoning behind the "cheese" posts but I'd much rather see the subject matter hashed out among all the respective parties rather than see someone try to do what they percieve to be "diffusing" the situation by resorting to such ridiculous nonsense as replying with "cheese" comments.
And my point was I haven't diffused anyone's (namely yours or PMs) anything with cheese. Y'all asked us to stop harping on the liner notes, but then it's OK to bring up bunched panties and cheese in a way to backhandedly insult?

I agree this shouldn't turn into a p*** match, Jah, but this really has GOT to be a two way street.
I agree but no one named names when it came to the "cheese" comments, by stepping forward and taking credit for it you made yourself guilty by association when you're not the only one that's made those kinds of comments in the past.
I don't recall denying my cheese input and I don't mind standing up for my cheese. I'm not guilty of anything because cheese is not a crime.

You said so yourself a few weeks ago you're making the effort and so have I...by NOT cheesing things that do not wish to be cheesed. So to have it brought up in such a way by PM in the same way others rib at his liner notes was quite offensive considering the whole peace thing we had goin' on here, and of all the things to rib at, he picked ones I primarily joke about in a thread (this one) I had not even participated in.

So, if it's OK for PM to make fun of ME I'm sure as hell gonna interject cheese where I want.
PM never mentioned you by name in his post. At all.

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:08 pm
by Tiki Bar
buffettbride wrote:I'm not guilty of anything because cheese is not a crime.
Now that's something you don't hear every day!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:09 pm
by Jahfin
7lords wrote:
Jahfin wrote:I agree but no one named names when it came to the "cheese" comments, by stepping forward and taking credit for it you made yourself guilty by association when you're not the only one that's made those kinds of comments in the past.
I used to see your side on some issues - you're making it harder and harder :roll:
Don't see how, Buffettbride isn't the only one that's used the "cheese" tactic in the past. PM never even called her by name in his post. I don't see what's so hard to understand about that.

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:09 pm
by 7lords
Jahfin wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote:
buffettbride wrote: He didn't have to. We ALL knew what he was talking about. :roll: :roll:
I don't think that's the case at all especially since you aren't the only one that's taken the "cheese, spork, etc." route in the past.
buffettbride wrote:And what exactly did it tell you?
It looks as though you've already answered that.

In hopes that this thread doesn't escalate into another useless p*** contest, I understand the reasoning behind the "cheese" posts but I'd much rather see the subject matter hashed out among all the respective parties rather than see someone try to do what they percieve to be "diffusing" the situation by resorting to such ridiculous nonsense as replying with "cheese" comments.
And my point was I haven't diffused anyone's (namely yours or PMs) anything with cheese. Y'all asked us to stop harping on the liner notes, but then it's OK to bring up bunched panties and cheese in a way to backhandedly insult?

I agree this shouldn't turn into a p*** match, Jah, but this really has GOT to be a two way street.
I agree but no one named names when it came to the "cheese" comments, by stepping forward and taking credit for it you made yourself guilty by association when you're not the only one that's made those kinds of comments in the past.
I don't recall denying my cheese input and I don't mind standing up for my cheese. I'm not guilty of anything because cheese is not a crime.

You said so yourself a few weeks ago you're making the effort and so have I...by NOT cheesing things that do not wish to be cheesed. So to have it brought up in such a way by PM in the same way others rib at his liner notes was quite offensive considering the whole peace thing we had goin' on here, and of all the things to rib at, he picked ones I primarily joke about in a thread (this one) I had not even participated in.

So, if it's OK for PM to make fun of ME I'm sure as hell gonna interject cheese where I want.
PM never mentioned you by name in his post. At all.
You just don't get it do you. Names didn't need to be mentioned - everyone knew what he was talking about :roll:

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:09 pm
by buffettbride
Jahfin wrote: PM never mentioned you by name in his post. At all.
Who else gets her panties in a bunch AND likes cheese?

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:10 pm
by CaptainP
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote: PM never mentioned you by name in his post. At all.
Who else gets her panties in a bunch AND likes cheese?
Who else gets cheese in her panties?

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:10 pm
by Tiki Bar
Jahfin wrote:PM never mentioned you by name in his post. At all.
But you've gotten mad at mentions of the DBT, and he gets mad at the mention of liner notes, when no names are mentioned...

I think that's bb's point...

But please, stop... everyone, including me!

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:10 pm
by buffettbride
Jahfin wrote:
7lords wrote:
Jahfin wrote:I agree but no one named names when it came to the "cheese" comments, by stepping forward and taking credit for it you made yourself guilty by association when you're not the only one that's made those kinds of comments in the past.
I used to see your side on some issues - you're making it harder and harder :roll:
Don't see how, Buffettbride isn't the only one that's used the "cheese" tactic in the past. PM never even called her by name in his post. I don't see what's so hard to understand about that.
He might be calling my name, but only from the privacy of his parents basement. :roll:

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:10 pm
by buffettbride
CaptainP wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote: PM never mentioned you by name in his post. At all.
Who else gets her panties in a bunch AND likes cheese?
Who else gets cheese in her panties?
THERE'S NO CHEESE IN MY PANTIES!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:11 pm
by Jahfin
AlbatrossFlyer wrote:
Jahfin wrote:That was only part of the question
no, hawkfan369 posed the following question:
what is Jimmy's taping policy?
others decided to change the topic to a "why doesn't jimmy allow taping" thread.

until i posted my first response, no other poster answered his question.
The only one that can answer that question is Buffett himself. Still, I see no harm whatsoever in someone also addressing the royalties aspect of the question. It's not as though it was completely off topic or anything.

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:12 pm
by 7lords
buffettbride wrote:
CaptainP wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote: PM never mentioned you by name in his post. At all.
Who else gets her panties in a bunch AND likes cheese?
Who else gets cheese in her panties?
THERE'S NO CHEESE IN MY PANTIES!!!!!!!!!!
:lol:

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:12 pm
by buffettbride
7lords wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
CaptainP wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote: PM never mentioned you by name in his post. At all.
Who else gets her panties in a bunch AND likes cheese?
Who else gets cheese in her panties?
THERE'S NO CHEESE IN MY PANTIES!!!!!!!!!!
:lol:
I love you.

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:13 pm
by Tiki Bar
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote: PM never mentioned you by name in his post. At all.
Who else gets her panties in a bunch AND likes cheese?
:o :lol: :lol: :lol: Sorry... but that's another great addition to quotable quotes!! 2 - same poster - same day - same thread! I'm impressed!

Posted: August 26, 2005 1:13 pm
by CaptainP
buffettbride wrote:
CaptainP wrote:
buffettbride wrote:
Jahfin wrote: PM never mentioned you by name in his post. At all.
Who else gets her panties in a bunch AND likes cheese?
Who else gets cheese in her panties?
THERE'S NO CHEESE IN MY PANTIES!!!!!!!!!!
Laundry day?