Moderator: SMLCHNG
Jerry Rice got cut because he's almost as old as I am.buffettbride wrote:I don't see why there would be talk of Denver picking him up either. We have a great set of receivers. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Hell, we had to cut Jerry Rice because we have so many good receivers.
TO is icky.
well it's pretty clear we don't want him either. (Note - we is defined as "THE Eagles" - the fans like winning. This is a BIG Issue here right now.)buffettbride wrote:Nope. Y'all can keep him. We don't want him.mings wrote:Denver would benefit from TO's tendency to restructure defenses. The only catch is his potential lack of. Plummer has been playing well, but it's no secret that he's not the best QB in the league. How long until TO goes off on him? The same would ring true for Bledsoe and Dallas. He could be that final advantage that puts the Broncos over the edge.buffettbride wrote:Well, since Denver is winning consistently, there's really no need to add that kind of personality to the bunch. Not everyone looks good wearing orange and blue.mings wrote:All I'm saying is what I'm hearing (plus what I think and a little jibberish to boot). Shanahan in Denver has been known to put up with borderline personalities and take a risk in order to win. Parcells? Well he already has Keyshawn, and Jerry Jones has said he wants TO. When an owner as meddelsome as he, says that, well you can probably take it to the bank.buffettbride wrote:I don't see why there would be talk of Denver picking him up either. We have a great set of receivers. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Hell, we had to cut Jerry Rice because we have so many good receivers.z-man wrote: No way in hell Bill Parcells puts up with TO's BS!
TO is icky.
But I'd take an old JR over ANY TO. JR was good for morale. I think he added a lot to the receivers we have during preseason and training camp. It's not often you get to play with the best that's ever been.LIPH wrote:Jerry Rice got cut because he's almost as old as I am.buffettbride wrote:I don't see why there would be talk of Denver picking him up either. We have a great set of receivers. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Hell, we had to cut Jerry Rice because we have so many good receivers.
TO is icky.
But TO did give teh Eagles the Super Bowl. They would never have made it without his yards after catch last year. They would still have TO right now if McNabb didn't say "Yeah we can win without TO." before the Super Bowl, and if TO had not taken that personally.buffettbride wrote:But I'd take an old JR over ANY TO. JR was good for morale. I think he added a lot to the receivers we have during preseason and training camp. It's not often you get to play with the best that's ever been.LIPH wrote:Jerry Rice got cut because he's almost as old as I am.buffettbride wrote:I don't see why there would be talk of Denver picking him up either. We have a great set of receivers. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Hell, we had to cut Jerry Rice because we have so many good receivers.
TO is icky.
I think that's a fabulous idea! Those two... errrr, three sh!theads deserve each other!!!mings wrote:there's talk that he may be going to Oaktown now. At least that's what Randy Moss is saying. Can Al Davis handle it?
`How do you know I'm mad?' said Alice.It would be an interesting dynamiciuparrothead wrote:I think that's a fabulous idea! Those two... errrr, three sh!theads deserve each other!!!mings wrote:there's talk that he may be going to Oaktown now. At least that's what Randy Moss is saying. Can Al Davis handle it?
Rod Smith is not outstanding???mings wrote:But TO did give teh Eagles the Super Bowl. They would never have made it without his yards after catch last year. They would still have TO right now if McNabb didn't say "Yeah we can win without TO." before the Super Bowl, and if TO had not taken that personally.buffettbride wrote:But I'd take an old JR over ANY TO. JR was good for morale. I think he added a lot to the receivers we have during preseason and training camp. It's not often you get to play with the best that's ever been.LIPH wrote:Jerry Rice got cut because he's almost as old as I am.buffettbride wrote:I don't see why there would be talk of Denver picking him up either. We have a great set of receivers. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Hell, we had to cut Jerry Rice because we have so many good receivers.
TO is icky.
Rice was good, and I'm sure he passed on a lot, but none of the Denver recvr's are outstanding. There's no doubt that TO is outstanding at what he does.
