Page 6 of 8
Posted: February 20, 2006 11:32 am
by PA PAR8 HED
Coconuts wrote:case wrote:Hey, i like the idea of Late in the evening
i'd rather hear an original but since we're on the topic of cover songs
how about kenny ches... just kidding
for some reason i would like to hear buffett do something celtic flavored
maybe mark Knopflers "what it is" or "why aye man" or great big seas "boston and Saint John" or something of Shane MacGowans with a buffett twist
Or maybe Gaelic Storm's Pina Coloda in a Pint Glass.
I just downloaded Pina Colada in a Pint Glass...awesome song! Thanks for the suggestion.
Posted: February 20, 2006 11:39 am
by RinglingRingling
Touch O Parrotdise wrote:if the VP is such a VIP....
Lt. Steven Hauk: Sir, in my heart, I know I'm funny.
Posted: February 20, 2006 11:44 am
by Touch O Parrotdise
Excuse me, sir. Seeing as how the VP is such a VIP, shouldn't we keep the PC on the QT? 'Cause if it leaks to the VC he could end up an MIA and we could all be put on KP."..
Posted: February 20, 2006 11:47 am
by RinglingRingling
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: I understand you're pretty funny as a dee-jay and, well, comedy is kind of a hobby of mine. Well, actually, it's a little more than just a hobby, Reader's Digest is considering publishing two of my jokes.
Adrian Cronauer: Really.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: Yeah. And perhaps some night we could maybe get together and swap humorous stories, for fun.
Adrian Cronauer: Oh, why not? Maybe play a couple of Tennessee Ernie Ford records, that'd be a hoot.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: That's a joke, right?
Adrian Cronauer: Maybe.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: I get it.
Posted: February 20, 2006 12:02 pm
by Jahfin
RinglingRingling wrote:Lieutenant Steven Hauk: I understand you're pretty funny as a dee-jay and, well, comedy is kind of a hobby of mine. Well, actually, it's a little more than just a hobby, Reader's Digest is considering publishing two of my jokes.
Adrian Cronauer: Really.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: Yeah. And perhaps some night we could maybe get together and swap humorous stories, for fun.
Adrian Cronauer: Oh, why not? Maybe play a couple of Tennessee Ernie Ford records, that'd be a hoot.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: That's a joke, right?
Adrian Cronauer: Maybe.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: I get it.
I gather that's a scene from
Good Morning Vietnam but you still haven't explained why you keep referring to me as Bruno Kirby's character in the movie. I've asked as politely as I know how for you to please explain why you keep referring to me as him but you simply refuse. A straightforward explanation would be appreciated very much. Thanks.
Posted: February 20, 2006 12:06 pm
by RinglingRingling
Jahfin wrote:RinglingRingling wrote:Lieutenant Steven Hauk: I understand you're pretty funny as a dee-jay and, well, comedy is kind of a hobby of mine. Well, actually, it's a little more than just a hobby, Reader's Digest is considering publishing two of my jokes.
Adrian Cronauer: Really.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: Yeah. And perhaps some night we could maybe get together and swap humorous stories, for fun.
Adrian Cronauer: Oh, why not? Maybe play a couple of Tennessee Ernie Ford records, that'd be a hoot.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: That's a joke, right?
Adrian Cronauer: Maybe.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: I get it.
I gather that's a scene from
Good Morning Vietnam but you still haven't explained why you keep referring to me as Bruno Kirby's character in the movie. I've asked as politely as I know how for you to please explain why you keep referring to me as him but you simply refuse. A straightforward explanation would be appreciated very much. Thanks.
Maybe if you watched the movie, you'd understand, make the connection. But this line, with "Jahfin" replacing "Lt. Steven Hauk" pretty much seems to sum it up:
Lt. Steven Hauk: Sir, in my heart, I know I'm funny.
Posted: February 20, 2006 12:27 pm
by Jahfin
RinglingRingling wrote:Jahfin wrote:RinglingRingling wrote:Lieutenant Steven Hauk: I understand you're pretty funny as a dee-jay and, well, comedy is kind of a hobby of mine. Well, actually, it's a little more than just a hobby, Reader's Digest is considering publishing two of my jokes.
Adrian Cronauer: Really.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: Yeah. And perhaps some night we could maybe get together and swap humorous stories, for fun.
Adrian Cronauer: Oh, why not? Maybe play a couple of Tennessee Ernie Ford records, that'd be a hoot.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: That's a joke, right?
Adrian Cronauer: Maybe.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: I get it.
I gather that's a scene from
Good Morning Vietnam but you still haven't explained why you keep referring to me as Bruno Kirby's character in the movie. I've asked as politely as I know how for you to please explain why you keep referring to me as him but you simply refuse. A straightforward explanation would be appreciated very much. Thanks.
Maybe if you watched the movie, you'd understand, make the connection. But this line, with "Jahfin" replacing "Lt. Steven Hauk" pretty much seems to sum it up:
Lt. Steven Hauk: Sir, in my heart, I know I'm funny.
I've explained to you countless times now that I
have seen the movie but it's been awhile. I've since asked you very politely to explain why you keep referring to me as Lt. Hauk. Instead of actually explaining as I've so politely requested, I get more innuendo. Either explain to me either here or in a PM why you keep referring to me as Lt. Hauk or put a lid on it already. Either would be very much appreciated. Thank you.
Posted: February 20, 2006 12:30 pm
by CaptainP
Jahfin wrote:RinglingRingling wrote:Jahfin wrote:RinglingRingling wrote:Lieutenant Steven Hauk: I understand you're pretty funny as a dee-jay and, well, comedy is kind of a hobby of mine. Well, actually, it's a little more than just a hobby, Reader's Digest is considering publishing two of my jokes.
Adrian Cronauer: Really.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: Yeah. And perhaps some night we could maybe get together and swap humorous stories, for fun.
Adrian Cronauer: Oh, why not? Maybe play a couple of Tennessee Ernie Ford records, that'd be a hoot.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: That's a joke, right?
Adrian Cronauer: Maybe.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: I get it.
I gather that's a scene from
Good Morning Vietnam but you still haven't explained why you keep referring to me as Bruno Kirby's character in the movie. I've asked as politely as I know how for you to please explain why you keep referring to me as him but you simply refuse. A straightforward explanation would be appreciated very much. Thanks.
Maybe if you watched the movie, you'd understand, make the connection. But this line, with "Jahfin" replacing "Lt. Steven Hauk" pretty much seems to sum it up:
Lt. Steven Hauk: Sir, in my heart, I know I'm funny.
I've explained to you countless times now that I
have seen the movie but it's been awhile. I've since asked you very politely to explain why you keep referring to me as Lt. Hauk. Instead of actually explaining as I've so politely requested, I get more innuendo. Either explain to me either here or in a PM why you keep referring to me as Lt. Hauk or put a lid on it already. Either would be very much appreciated. Thank you.
In the movie, Lt. Hauk thinks he's funny, but nobody else does. In fact, he's completely NOT funny.
My guess is that RR thinks of you in the same way.
Posted: February 20, 2006 12:37 pm
by Jahfin
CaptainP wrote:Jahfin wrote:RinglingRingling wrote:Jahfin wrote:RinglingRingling wrote:Lieutenant Steven Hauk: I understand you're pretty funny as a dee-jay and, well, comedy is kind of a hobby of mine. Well, actually, it's a little more than just a hobby, Reader's Digest is considering publishing two of my jokes.
Adrian Cronauer: Really.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: Yeah. And perhaps some night we could maybe get together and swap humorous stories, for fun.
Adrian Cronauer: Oh, why not? Maybe play a couple of Tennessee Ernie Ford records, that'd be a hoot.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: That's a joke, right?
Adrian Cronauer: Maybe.
Lieutenant Steven Hauk: I get it.
I gather that's a scene from
Good Morning Vietnam but you still haven't explained why you keep referring to me as Bruno Kirby's character in the movie. I've asked as politely as I know how for you to please explain why you keep referring to me as him but you simply refuse. A straightforward explanation would be appreciated very much. Thanks.
Maybe if you watched the movie, you'd understand, make the connection. But this line, with "Jahfin" replacing "Lt. Steven Hauk" pretty much seems to sum it up:
Lt. Steven Hauk: Sir, in my heart, I know I'm funny.
I've explained to you countless times now that I
have seen the movie but it's been awhile. I've since asked you very politely to explain why you keep referring to me as Lt. Hauk. Instead of actually explaining as I've so politely requested, I get more innuendo. Either explain to me either here or in a PM why you keep referring to me as Lt. Hauk or put a lid on it already. Either would be very much appreciated. Thank you.
In the movie, Lt. Hauk thinks he's funny, but nobody else does. In fact, he's completely NOT funny.
My guess is that RR thinks of you in the same way.
Thanks, that's all I was asking for was an explanation.
Funny you should mention that though as I (and many others here) think of Ringling, Ringling in exactly the same light. He keeps referring to an "audience" that apparently finds his jabs funny but to my knowledge that audience is totally nonexistent.
Posted: February 20, 2006 2:38 pm
by HTparrothead
my vote .. "gringo honeymoon" or "feelin good again" by Robert Earl Keen
Posted: February 20, 2006 4:07 pm
by BigRedParrothead
Posted: February 20, 2006 4:25 pm
by RinglingRingling
TOP, given you know the movie much better than Jah... care to guess the line even more appropriate than "In my heart..."?
Posted: February 20, 2006 4:52 pm
by Jahfin
RinglingRingling wrote:
TOP, given you know the movie much better than Jah... care to guess the line even more appropriate than "In my heart..."?
I wonder if you even bother to actually read my posts before spouting off with another your smart aleck remarks. I
didn't say I didn't know the movie, I said it's been a while since I've seen it. I'm damn sure not going to go rent it just so I can comprehend your senseless messages. All you had to do was simply honor my request to explain yourself but you chose not to do that.
Posted: February 20, 2006 4:55 pm
by RinglingRingling
Jahfin wrote:RinglingRingling wrote:
TOP, given you know the movie much better than Jah... care to guess the line even more appropriate than "In my heart..."?
I wonder if you even bother to actually read my posts before spouting off with another your smart aleck remarks. I
didn't say I didn't know the movie, I said it's been a while since I've seen it. I'm damn sure not going to go rent it just so I can comprehend your senseless messages. All you had to do was simply honor my request to explain yourself but you chose not to do that.
I did read them. I discerned the following:
You can't quote lines from the movie
You don't know who the characters are
You can't make a connection even when presented with dialogue.
That about sum it up Lt.?
Posted: February 20, 2006 4:59 pm
by Jahfin
RinglingRingling wrote:Jahfin wrote:RinglingRingling wrote:
TOP, given you know the movie much better than Jah... care to guess the line even more appropriate than "In my heart..."?
I wonder if you even bother to actually read my posts before spouting off with another your smart aleck remarks. I
didn't say I didn't know the movie, I said it's been a while since I've seen it. I'm damn sure not going to go rent it just so I can comprehend your senseless messages. All you had to do was simply honor my request to explain yourself but you chose not to do that.
I did read them. I discerned the following:
You can't quote lines from the movie
You don't know who the characters are
You can't make a connection even when presented with dialogue.
That about sum it up Lt.?
I saw the movie but I didn't commit it to memory. I very politely asked you to explain your references. Instead of doing that you kept quoting things from the movie. Thankfully someone else much kinder than yourself came along and explained. You? You just don't get it.
Posted: February 20, 2006 5:27 pm
by RinglingRingling
Jahfin wrote:RinglingRingling wrote:Jahfin wrote:RinglingRingling wrote:
TOP, given you know the movie much better than Jah... care to guess the line even more appropriate than "In my heart..."?
I wonder if you even bother to actually read my posts before spouting off with another your smart aleck remarks. I
didn't say I didn't know the movie, I said it's been a while since I've seen it. I'm damn sure not going to go rent it just so I can comprehend your senseless messages. All you had to do was simply honor my request to explain yourself but you chose not to do that.
I did read them. I discerned the following:
You can't quote lines from the movie
You don't know who the characters are
You can't make a connection even when presented with dialogue.
That about sum it up Lt.?
I saw the movie but I didn't commit it to memory. I very politely asked you to explain your references. Instead of doing that you kept quoting things from the movie. Thankfully someone else much kinder than yourself came along and explained. You? You just don't get it.
I get it. see the above discernations.
Posted: February 20, 2006 5:44 pm
by Jahfin
RinglingRingling wrote:Jahfin wrote:RinglingRingling wrote:Jahfin wrote:RinglingRingling wrote:
TOP, given you know the movie much better than Jah... care to guess the line even more appropriate than "In my heart..."?
I wonder if you even bother to actually read my posts before spouting off with another your smart aleck remarks. I
didn't say I didn't know the movie, I said it's been a while since I've seen it. I'm damn sure not going to go rent it just so I can comprehend your senseless messages. All you had to do was simply honor my request to explain yourself but you chose not to do that.
I did read them. I discerned the following:
You can't quote lines from the movie
You don't know who the characters are
You can't make a connection even when presented with dialogue.
That about sum it up Lt.?
I saw the movie but I didn't commit it to memory. I very politely asked you to explain your references. Instead of doing that you kept quoting things from the movie. Thankfully someone else much kinder than yourself came along and explained. You? You just don't get it.
I get it. see the above discernations.
Apparently you
don't get it or you would have just explained what you meant as I very politely asked you to. Instead, you chose to totally ignore those requests and continued to make references to the movie.
Posted: February 20, 2006 5:46 pm
by Brown Eyed Girl
Posted: February 20, 2006 5:48 pm
by LIPH
Please, stop it. Put it out of its misery.
Posted: February 20, 2006 5:52 pm
by Jahfin
I haven't said anything rude to anyone in this thread so please don't make this another attack on Jahfin. I asked this person to please explain themselves and what have they done? Ignored that request time and time and again and it's all here in this thread for all of the world to see. So, the next time Ringling, Ringling starts up some of her crap don't go blaming it on me. I have remained very civil and polite but still, this person outright refused to cooperate. Thanks to CaptainP for actually answering the question, 'tis much appreciated.
