BuffettNews.com

CaptainP wrote:

tikitatas wrote:Or is this photo Photoshopped? I mean, if make-up could cover the marks . . .

Or not. Unless they got this one, too:

Any closer range and ol' Harry'd been a goner.

LIPH wrote:

tikitatas wrote:Or is this photo Photoshopped?

It's a vast left wing conspiracy by the liberal mainstream media to make Dick Cheney look bad.

He doesn't need any help from the media. He's associated with GWBush. He looks bad by association.

CaptainP wrote:

LIPH wrote:

tikitatas wrote:Or is this photo Photoshopped?

It's a vast left wing conspiracy by the liberal mainstream media to make Dick Cheney look bad.

He doesn't need any help from the media. He's associated with GWBush. He looks bad by association.

<3 ya, CaptainP!

tikitatas wrote:

CaptainP wrote:

tikitatas wrote:Or is this photo Photoshopped? I mean, if make-up could cover the marks . . .

Or not. Unless they got this one, too:

Any closer range and ol' Harry'd been a goner.

They could have at least trimmed/shaved the other eyebrow for him.

tikitatas wrote:

CaptainP wrote:

tikitatas wrote:Or is this photo Photoshopped? I mean, if make-up could cover the marks . . .

Or not. Unless they got this one, too:

Any closer range and ol' Harry'd been a goner.

You must remember there is a difference between televison cameras and a still camera.... Again the angle I saw WAS NOT that close up, zoomed in, or at that angle.

Was the photo "doctored"? I never said or indicated anything like that.