To what extent...
Posted: May 2, 2006 12:19 am
Just curious.
wait till you get reamed because you do not have this language or thatSchoolGirlHeart wrote:This subject really gets my blood pressure up.
IMHO, there are two different topics here that people are trying to make into one.
It seems like people with an agenda are trying to equate immigration and ILLEGAL immigration.
LEGAL immigrants have rights. ILLEGAL immigrants do not enjoy nor do they deserve the rights that legal immigrants are afforded.
My great-grandparents were immigrants. My husband is an immigrant. LEGAL, all of them. The didn't come here expecting it to be like back home. They adapted to living here. They never asked for an special consideration.
Of *course* immigrants are important to this country. We are all either immigrants or descendants of immigrants. But to equate illegal immigrants with legal immigrants disrespects those who have invested the time and the money to be here legally.
sooo you are really a treetop flyer????AlbatrossFlyer wrote:not at all, but then again technically i'm an immigrant in canakianland
are you ever coming back to the motherland?AlbatrossFlyer wrote:not at all, but then again technically i'm an immigrant in canakianland
And of course, my answer to that would be, "Your mother has lived here for over 30 years and hasn't had the time to learn English?"ragtopW wrote:" My Mother has lived over hear 30 years and it's time for you americans to provide her with a tv show in her native tounge"
don't blame you!AlbatrossFlyer wrote:all i can say is if the landscaping company i hired to redo my backyard messes up the schedule because the help didn't show up for work there's gonna be hell to pay...
wJs. Only my grandparents came from Czechoslovakia and Germany.SchoolGirlHeart wrote:It seems like people with an agenda are trying to equate immigration and ILLEGAL immigration.
LEGAL immigrants have rights. ILLEGAL immigrants do not enjoy nor do they deserve the rights that legal immigrants are afforded.
My great-grandparents were immigrants. My husband is an immigrant. LEGAL, all of them. The didn't come here expecting it to be like back home. They adapted to living here. They never asked for an special consideration.
Of *course* immigrants are important to this country. We are all either immigrants or descendants of immigrants. But to equate illegal immigrants with legal immigrants disrespects those who have invested the time and the money to be here legally.
Absolutely there's a difference. I'm all for rights for legal immigrants, and I'm all for letting people stay -- as long as they have their paperwork in order to become nationalized or citizens.SchoolGirlHeart wrote:This subject really gets my blood pressure up.
IMHO, there are two different topics here that people are trying to make into one.
It seems like people with an agenda are trying to equate immigration and ILLEGAL immigration.
LEGAL immigrants have rights. ILLEGAL immigrants do not enjoy nor do they deserve the rights that legal immigrants are afforded.
My great-grandparents were immigrants. My husband is an immigrant. LEGAL, all of them. The didn't come here expecting it to be like back home. They adapted to living here. They never asked for an special consideration.
Of *course* immigrants are important to this country. We are all either immigrants or descendants of immigrants. But to equate illegal immigrants with legal immigrants disrespects those who have invested the time and the money to be here legally.
yep, and congrats to your family. mine didn't arrive until the 1880s/1890s, and they were fortunate to be English speakers, but that didn't keep them from facing NINA (No Irish Need Apply) signs. I guess my family has helped preserve the way of life yours built, AF. Over three generations, we've served in the military in every war/conflict except Vietnam (two generations were too old, mine too young).AlbatrossFlyer wrote:i'm proud to say my family created this country..... and the so called native americans are natives they just immigrated earlier...
I know, and not to ding you at all, but it seemed like the organizers of today's event want to lump ALL immigrants together, legal and illegal.DonnaKayDunbar wrote:Absolutely there's a difference. I'm all for rights for legal immigrants, and I'm all for letting people stay -- as long as they have their paperwork in order to become nationalized or citizens.
Just curious as to whose life was directly affected by "a day without immigrants".
Sorry, LB, but I don't buy it. In the last few generations, the greatest influx of immigrants was to the northern cities. The immigrants of my parents' and grandparents' generation adapted to America, not the other way around. They didn't think anyone owed them anything besides a chance to make a better life through hard work.Lightning Bolt wrote:It's a helluva lot easier to be hard-line about this when you live up north![]()
I'll give you the generational argument to the North...25 years ago... but you know it's a fraction of the TODAY'S numbers that is stirring the anti-immigration mongering in the Congress. The argument made is "we are a country of immigrants", but we know the HUGE influx is coming from the southern border, and that majority is settling in the Southwest.SchoolGirlHeart wrote:Sorry, LB, but I don't buy it. In the last few generations, the greatest influx of immigrants was to the northern cities. The immigrants of my parents' and grandparents' generation adapted to America, not the other way around. They didn't think anyone owed them anything besides a chance to make a better life through hard work.Lightning Bolt wrote:It's a helluva lot easier to be hard-line about this when you live up north![]()
And today, there is a large immigrant population in the north.
I realize that "deport them all" is overly simplistic and probably unrealistic. But letting them all stay, and giving them benefits paid for by my tax dollars is way more than I can stomach.
I'm actually not talking about the last 25 years or so, but moreso the late 1800s through the 1950s. Without actually looking up the numbers, I think the percentages weren't too different. Yes, the numbers are huge today. And while the overall numbers of immigrants was smaller in the north two or three generations ago, I think the percentage probably wasn't too different. The northern cities were inundated with immigrants from norhtern Europe. It just wasn't quite as obvious at a glance, because they were mostly Causasian instead of Latino.Lightning Bolt wrote:I'll give you the generational argument to the North...25 years ago... but you know it's a fraction of the TODAY'S numbers that is stirring the anti-immigration mongering in the Congress. The argument made is "we are a country of immigrants", but we know the HUGE influx is coming from the southern border, and that majority is settling in the Southwest.
Here's an interesting article from today...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060430/ap_ ... ies_of_war