Pit Bull may be cleared of charges...

land_shark3 · Post by **land_shark3** » December 21, 2006 1:58 pm

Article

Mom says ferret, not dog, gnawed off baby toes
BENTON, La. - A woman jailed after four of her infant daughter’s toes were gnawed off says the family’s pet ferret did it, not their pit bull pup as police had said.

But her husband blames the dog, a city official said.

“The way the bite marks were on her foot, the ferret being out of its cage, I knew it wasn’t the dog,” Mary Hansche told KTBS-TV on Tuesday.

pbans · Post by **pbans** » December 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Attorney Pam Smart said she is waiting for results of a hair analysis to back up the couple’s statement that they were not using drugs, calling the case a “very unfortunate accident.”

AN ACCIDENT?????
No, that wasn't an accident......
The animals should be taken to a shelter and the parents should be put to sleep.....why the f*ck was a month old baby sleeping somewhere where ANY animal would have access to it??????

rednekkPH · Post by **rednekkPH** » December 21, 2006 2:09 pm

pbans wrote:Attorney Pam Smart said she is waiting for results of a hair analysis to back up the couple’s statement that they were not using drugs, calling the case a “very unfortunate accident.”

AN ACCIDENT?????
No, that wasn't an accident......
The animals should be taken to a shelter and the parents should be put to sleep.....why the f*ck was a month old baby sleeping somewhere where ANY animal would have access to it??????

Let me get this straight, are you saying that infants are not appropriate pet treats?

RinglingRingling · Post by **RinglingRingling** » December 21, 2006 2:10 pm

pbans wrote:Attorney Pam Smart said she is waiting for results of a hair analysis to back up the couple’s statement that they were not using drugs, calling the case a “very unfortunate accident.”

AN ACCIDENT?????
No, that wasn't an accident......
The animals should be taken to a shelter and the parents should be put to sleep.....why the f*ck was a month old baby sleeping somewhere where ANY animal would have access to it??????

Attorney Pam Smart? Last I heard, she was a school teacher...

land_shark3 · Post by **land_shark3** » December 21, 2006 2:17 pm

rednekkPH wrote:Let me get this straight, are you saying that infants are not appropriate pet treats?

That is so inappropriate! NO, infants are not good pet treats.

They are small and some animals may get chocked trying to swallow them. Kids age 4-14 typically are better for the pet. They provide the animal with exercise in chasing the kid down and then promote proper chewing techniques.

CapnK · Post by **CapnK** » December 21, 2006 2:20 pm

land_shark3 wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:Let me get this straight, are you saying that infants are not appropriate pet treats?
That is so inappropriate! NO, infants are not good pet treats.

They are small and some animals may get chocked trying to swallow them. Kids age 4-14 typically are better for the pet. They provide the animal with exercise in chasing the kid down and then promote proper chewing techniques.

you see! I knew I was doing it wrong. Poor 'ole Spooner.

RinglingRingling · Post by **RinglingRingling** » December 21, 2006 2:25 pm

CapnK wrote:
land_shark3 wrote:
rednekkPH wrote:Let me get this straight, are you saying that infants are not appropriate pet treats?
That is so inappropriate! NO, infants are not good pet treats.

They are small and some animals may get chocked trying to swallow them. Kids age 4-14 typically are better for the pet. They provide the animal with exercise in chasing the kid down and then promote proper chewing techniques.
you see! I knew I was doing it wrong. Poor 'ole Spooner.

well, what did you expect feeding an infant to a shih tzu? that was a choking episode anyway you sliced it.

pbans · Post by **pbans** » December 21, 2006 4:58 pm

rednekkPH wrote:
pbans wrote:Attorney Pam Smart said she is waiting for results of a hair analysis to back up the couple’s statement that they were not using drugs, calling the case a “very unfortunate accident.”

AN ACCIDENT?????
No, that wasn't an accident......
The animals should be taken to a shelter and the parents should be put to sleep.....why the f*ck was a month old baby sleeping somewhere where ANY animal would have access to it??????
Let me get this straight, are you saying that infants are not appropriate pet treats?

only ugly ones....

ragtopW · Post by **ragtopW** » December 21, 2006 9:03 pm

Ferrets are vile little creatures..