Page 1 of 1

Van Halen 2.0

Posted: February 19, 2007 11:36 am
by ~ Parrot Bay ~
Here they are:

Image

Look like Wolfgang has lost some weight.......

Re: Van Halen 2.0

Posted: February 19, 2007 11:39 am
by CaptainP
~ Parrot Bay ~ wrote:Here they are:


Image

Look like Wolfgang has lost some weight.......
And the rest of them have lost some hair...

Re: Van Halen 2.0

Posted: February 19, 2007 11:40 am
by Capt.Flock
CaptainP wrote:
~ Parrot Bay ~ wrote:Here they are:


Image

Look like Wolfgang has lost some weight.......
And the rest of them have lost some hair...
so what is the over and under for how long they will stay together

Posted: February 19, 2007 11:42 am
by txaggirl91
they will be lucky to make it past the first week of the tour...

eddie and alex look like crap.

Re: Van Halen 2.0

Posted: February 19, 2007 11:45 am
by job41475
Capt.Flock wrote:
CaptainP wrote:
~ Parrot Bay ~ wrote:Here they are:


Image

Look like Wolfgang has lost some weight.......
And the rest of them have lost some hair...
so what is the over and under for how long they will stay together

4.5 shows

Posted: February 19, 2007 12:03 pm
by Indiana Jolly Mon
WOW, what the hell happened to Eddie?
Drugs are bad MMkay :lol:

Re: Van Halen 2.0

Posted: February 19, 2007 12:12 pm
by ~ Parrot Bay ~
job41475 wrote:
Capt.Flock wrote:
CaptainP wrote:
~ Parrot Bay ~ wrote:Here they are:


Image

Look like Wolfgang has lost some weight.......
And the rest of them have lost some hair...
so what is the over and under for how long they will stay together

4.5 shows
I say 2 shows before Eddie fires everyone and does the tour solo.

Image

Posted: February 19, 2007 12:15 pm
by Tiki Torches
Van Halen "2.0"? Isn't this at least the third version of the band?

As for the hair thing, it appears Eddie still has a full head of hair and Alex really doesn't look that much different.

Before making any wagers on how long the tour will last, let's see if they manage to even make it out of rehearsals first.

Re: Van Halen 2.0

Posted: February 19, 2007 12:40 pm
by ~Hippolyte~
Did Eddie think he wouldn't be recognized without THAT guitar?

Image

and who ever is doing Dave's 'look' should have been there when he appeared on the Soprano's. holy hell he looked bad then.
Image

I will say that Eddie looks better than he did here:
(I think he's holding his dentures!)

Image

Re: Van Halen 2.0

Posted: February 19, 2007 1:11 pm
by ConchRepublican
~Hippolyte~ wrote:Did Eddie think he wouldn't be recognized without THAT guitar?

Image

and who ever is doing Dave's 'look' should have been there when he appeared on the Soprano's. holy hell he looked bad then.
Image

I will say that Eddie looks better than he did here:
(I think he's holding his dentures!)

Image
OMG!!!!!!!

They should follow the KISS example and start licensing everything, starting with Halloween masks!

Posted: February 19, 2007 1:19 pm
by Tiki Torches
Why all the emphasis on their looks? I'm much more concerned about them still having their chops.

Re: Van Halen 2.0

Posted: February 19, 2007 4:44 pm
by ~ Parrot Bay ~
~Hippolyte~ wrote:Did Eddie think he wouldn't be recognized without THAT guitar?

Image
Eddie's pitching his new Fender Frankenstein Replica where ever he can. They sale for only $25,000.00 each.

Posted: February 19, 2007 5:14 pm
by ~Hippolyte~
Tiki Torches wrote:Why all the emphasis on their looks? I'm much more concerned about them still having their chops.
again, I think that picture is of Eddie holding his chops :lol:

I'll be surprised if the tour completes as planned. I'll be surprised if they make it past three shows. I'll not be surprised when I receive my refund notice from ticketmaster, as I'll be buying tickets for the show....if it makes it that far, and if the price isn't so ridiculous that I laugh and say, "hell no!"
Tiki Torches wrote:Van Halen "2.0"? Isn't this at least the third version of the band?
this is more like version 0.8, it's the same line-up as 1.0 but a downgrade with age and they're missing the man who sang back-up on so many of the songs 1.0 produced. this band, without Michael Anthony, isn't quite the same, but it's definitely not 2.0, though it should be better than 3.0 (though I'll admit I like a couple of the songs from VH3)