BuffettNews.com

NorthernConch wrote:buffettnews could start a collection!

Ok lou, the new owners, all 13,000 of them want to make a few changes......

Actually, that was the way it was. Before the Tribune bought them, they were a publicly held team (like the Celtics, and the Green Bay Packers) with 10,000 shares issued.

Wrigley owned roughly 8100 shares.

I owned one.

ejr wrote:

NorthernConch wrote:buffettnews could start a collection!

Ok lou, the new owners, all 13,000 of them want to make a few changes......

Actually, that was the way it was. Before the Tribune bought them, they were a publicly held team (like the Celtics, and the Green Bay Packers) with 10,000 shares issued.

Wrigley owned roughly 8100 shares.

I owned one.

You traded Lou Brock? What were you thinking?

chippewa wrote:

ejr wrote:

NorthernConch wrote:buffettnews could start a collection!

Ok lou, the new owners, all 13,000 of them want to make a few changes......

Actually, that was the way it was. Before the Tribune bought them, they were a publicly held team (like the Celtics, and the Green Bay Packers) with 10,000 shares issued.

Wrigley owned roughly 8100 shares.

I owned one.

You traded Lou Brock? What were you thinking?

I am innocent on that! Not a stockholder until 1974 (a college graduation present).