I guess it could be worse

popcornjack · Post by **popcornjack** » October 22, 2007 1:12 am

I mean, this is certainly better than one of the alternatives that was offered...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071021/ap_ ... identifier

CapnK · Post by **CapnK** » October 22, 2007 10:06 am

I predict somebody in marketing is gonna get fired in the near future when this cutsey thing doesn't quite work out.

ph4ever · Post by **ph4ever** » October 22, 2007 12:06 pm

I think I'm gonna buy one of their tshirts as the next time I fly it will be during the holidays

citcat · Post by **citcat** » October 22, 2007 1:05 pm

ph4ever wrote:I think I'm gonna buy one of their tshirts as the next time I fly it will be during the holidays

I want one of them too !!!

They could use XY instead of the UX and change it to SXY.
That would be cutesy.

pojo · Post by **pojo** » October 22, 2007 4:40 pm

I could see that on the flight plan......

BIX-SUX........... interesting!!

RinglingRingling · Post by **RinglingRingling** » October 22, 2007 5:34 pm

CapnK wrote:I predict somebody in marketing is gonna get fired in the near future when this cutsey thing doesn't quite work out.

it's truth in advertising...

RinglingRingling · Post by **RinglingRingling** » October 22, 2007 5:38 pm

citcat wrote:
ph4ever wrote:I think I'm gonna buy one of their tshirts as the next time I fly it will be during the holidays
I want one of them too !!!

They could use XY instead of the UX and change it to SXY.
That would be cutesy.

Sioux City and Sexy are not terms that get used in the same sentence...

ragtopW · Post by **ragtopW** » October 22, 2007 9:17 pm

Bob and Tom were on this today..