Page 8 of 18

Posted: December 5, 2007 11:01 am
by CaptainP
drunkpirate66 wrote:

The Yankees current rotation

1. Wang
2. Petitte
3. Hughes
4. Kartsens
5. Kennedy

you like that!?


The Rays . . .

1. Kazmir
2. Shields
3. Garza
4. Jackson
5. Nieman . . .

at 1/2 the cost . . . I will take the Rays. No joke.
While I agree...I think Mussina can earn his way back into the Yanks rotation (YES, that would be an improvement, despite his recent struggles), or Chamberlain could start. And, as a Rays fan, I don't like to count on Jackson for anything. He's had too many failures. He's not a big-time prospect anymore, he's now just a reclaimation project. (You mention Willis as a WHIP problem....look at Jackson!!! Career BEST WHIP was 1.702). Maybe David Price will be ready...

Posted: December 5, 2007 11:26 am
by SuperTrooper
jonesbeach10 wrote:
drunkpirate66 wrote:Can't firgure out the Yankees . . .

they don't pony up the money for Dice K . . . they were outbid by the Red Sox. I know the pitching market is expensive, but I don't think a #2 or 3 starter is worth $100 million

Ok . . . but then they spend 40 something million on a nob like Kei Igawa . .
pure reaction move that flopped. He's a nob just like his buddy Carl Pavano. Won't argue that


. OK . . . . and then they go out and spend 25 million too much on Clemens .
At the time, they needed another pitcher because of the huge hole they were in. Fact of the matter is, as overpaid as he was (not gonna argue that), he provided stability to the rotation. I think the amount of shock there was over Clemens salary about equaled the amount of money Dice K got.

. . OK . . . then they won't put Ian Kennedy in a deal for Johan Santana but they will put Phillip Hughes in . . .
They did originally offer Kennedy and Melky Cabrera and mid-level, but the Twins wanted more. So they upped it with Hughes. Twins didn't like that deal and the Yankees backed out. Good for them. For as much as they would have had to pay Santana, I'd almost rather have a much cheaper Hughes or Kennedy.


OK . . . now it appears they lost Santana because of it . . . OK . . . so they sign an oldie Pettite who won't do much
Pettitte had a great year last year. Pitched great down the stretch and had the best start of any Yankee in the postseason.

. . . OK . . . and now it appears they lost out to Dan Haren at Arizona who is offering Conor Jackson . . . so now the Yankees are stuck with little no pitching and a horrible bull pen . . . OK.
As of now, their rotation is CM Wang who's going to win 15-20 games, Phil Hughes, who was brilliant for the Yankees in the postseason, and if he didn't get hurt probably would have made Clemens irrelevant last year. I think he wins 15-20 games also. Apparently, Joba is going to start because the Yankees are higher on him than they are on Hughes. If that's true, throw him in for 15-20 wins. Pettitte should give the Yankees 13-17 wins. Mussina probably 10-15. Add Kennedy in there probably for 10-15 wins if he starts. The problem for the Yankees isn't going to be starting pitching, I think they have plenty of that.

The problem is relief. As of now they have an aging Rivera, an inconsistent at best Farnsworth and Luis Vizcaino who wore down because Torre constantly turned to him. Both are 7th inning guys at best. I would love to see Joba go back to the pen a la Papelbon, and get eased into the closer role. Joba and Rivera would make one of the best 8th-9th inning guys in the majors and


:D
JB you need to take a deep breath about these young NY pitchers. None has pitched more than 165 innings in a season. (Kennedy - 165, Hughes - 146, Joba - 88) Expecting each of them to pitch 200+ innings in the AL East is a pipe dream. Most rookie starters hit a wall in August/Sept, right in the middle of a pennant race.

Mussina pitched the fewest innings for a full season in his career and his ERA ballooned to 5.15 with a WHIP of 1.467. He was exhausted in August.

As a #2 starter Wang is a solid inning-eater, but not a great pitcher. He benefited from the highest run support for NY starters (6.47 rpg).His post-season last year speaks for itself.

NY really gets a lift from the return of Pettitte, another solid inning-eater with a great post-season resume. At 35 he can still do it.

As usual in the AL East the bullpen puts a team on top or struggling. Without Joba to get to Rivera, Cashman will have to get some help.

Forget about Bedard. The Orioles won't trade him within the division.

Haren will cost almost as much as Santana, but I could see NY doing it if Boston gets Santana.

Posted: December 5, 2007 11:29 am
by CaptainP
I love having people here who really know baseball. I went WAY too long without having anyone to chat with. Now I have a guy at work (Todd), and the BN team. Even if Jon is wrong all the time. :P

Posted: December 5, 2007 11:39 am
by drunkpirate66
CaptainP wrote:
drunkpirate66 wrote:

The Yankees current rotation

1. Wang
2. Petitte
3. Hughes
4. Kartsens
5. Kennedy

you like that!?


The Rays . . .

1. Kazmir
2. Shields
3. Garza
4. Jackson
5. Nieman . . .

at 1/2 the cost . . . I will take the Rays. No joke.
While I agree...I think Mussina can earn his way back into the Yanks rotation (YES, that would be an improvement, despite his recent struggles), or Chamberlain could start. And, as a Rays fan, I don't like to count on Jackson for anything. He's had too many failures. He's not a big-time prospect anymore, he's now just a reclaimation project. (You mention Willis as a WHIP problem....look at Jackson!!! Career BEST WHIP was 1.702). Maybe David Price will be ready...

dude . . . fine . . . but Willis has nothing to do with this; but, fine, I will take the time out of my day to actually respond to this: Willis is better than Jackson. Happy?

And I doubt Mussina will throw 100 innings in 2008. I think he would be better used as a middle reliever/ spot starter.

Posted: December 5, 2007 11:43 am
by drunkpirate66
CaptainP wrote:I love having people here who really know baseball. I went WAY too long without having anyone to chat with. Now I have a guy at work (Todd), and the BN team. Even if Jon is wrong all the time. :P
I will go along with this too . . .

and I will make another bold prediction . . . the Brewers will not win as many games in 2008 as they did in 2007; unless they make a big move before April.

As much as I like Braun his numbers will not be, on percentage, in 162 games in 2008 as productive as he was in 2007 . . . other than errors . . . and the bull pen, in its current state, is sh it.

Posted: December 5, 2007 11:44 am
by chippewa
All the experts say Maybin will be great in time, but he was clearly overmatched this year. Given his youth and the fact that he never played triple A, that's to be expected. But when Detroit traded Monroe and gave Maybin the job, quite often he looked like the freshman kid brought up to the varsity. Word was that he wouldn't make the team coming north this season, which I think was the right call. As far as Miller, right now he's another "potential" guy. Flashes of brilliance, but wild as heck. The Tigers are looking to win now, so trading potential for proven performers makes sense.

I still say the one guy they should have kept was Jair Jurrjens, traded in the Renteria deal.

Posted: December 5, 2007 11:48 am
by drunkpirate66
CaptainP wrote:Now, despite the fact that I think Detroit made a good trade, I don't count on Cabrera being an MVP right away or anything.

There is a reason I pointed out his batting average before anything else. Cabrera is moving to a ballpark that is not power-friendly. Don't expect a 45-homer year from Cabrera anytime soon. But I can easily see him turning into another Magglio Ordonez for them. High average, decent power.
Like I said . . . average under .300 . . .

and it will not be representitive of his total bases and being caught in double plays . . .

Curtis Granderson, however, is my very early prediction to lead the American league in runs . . . unless Elisbury is batting lead off for the Sox.

Posted: December 5, 2007 11:50 am
by SuperTrooper
CaptainP wrote:
drunkpirate66 wrote:
CaptainP wrote:Don't be so quick to bash the Tigers. They want to win NOW.
They got 2 potential Superstars who are 27 and 25 years old.
They gave up a lot of future prospects, but look at their lineup and rotation. Do they really need them?

ROTATION:
Justin Verlander
Jeremy Bonderman
Dontrelle Willis
Kenny Rogers
Nate Robertson

LINEUP:
C Rodriguez
1B Guillen
2B Polanco
SS Renteria
3B Cabrera
OF Granderson, Ordonez, Jones
DH Sheffield

Nice mix of experience and youth. Very few holes left...Robertson & Jones maybe...The bullpen is solid once Zumaya comes back from a fluke injury (hurt while escaping the fires in San Diego)


They may have given up a lot, but they also can compete with anyone in the AL now.
There should be no argument when I say: Andrew Miller is twice the pitcher of Dontrelle Willis . . . Willis got lit up in the NL . . . he is going to get slammed in the AL . . .

Miller is younger, cheaper, and most importantly better . . .

and given a year, Maybin will be a premiere outfielder . . . I argue (and I really hate fat, slow power guys) that Maybin is more valuable than Cabrera . . . now.


Overall . . . poor move for the Tigers . . . their pitching staff got worse . . . and, although they added power; it was through a fat, slow, K' machine who is a medioce defender at best.
I'll never be able to convince you any different. Not if this is your honest opinion of a career .312 hitter, who is only 25 years old and has 5 years experience already.

And your opinion of Willis is clearly based on ONE season, playing for a pathetic team. He entered 2007 with a career ERA of 3.68 and a record of 19 games above .500. One bad year has soured you. And since you seem to love the "moneyball" type of stats....look at his K to BB ratio....more than 2 to 1 over his career.
I've had my eye on Willis for a while since I assumed Florida would trade him at some point. 2007 was truly a BAD year for him. IP was way down and hits were way up. Not a good way to come to the AL, which usually bumps up ERA by 1. 5 games he didn't get out of the 4th inning. He looks like a player that needs to grow up and learn how to "pitch", not throw. I worry he might be a bit of a headcase since he seemed to spiral out of control any time things went wrong. Pitching coach Chuck Hernandez will have his hands full.

Posted: December 5, 2007 11:53 am
by drunkpirate66
chippewa wrote:All the experts say Maybin will be great in time, but he was clearly overmatched this year. Given his youth and the fact that he never played triple A, that's to be expected. But when Detroit traded Monroe and gave Maybin the job, quite often he looked like the freshman kid brought up to the varsity. Word was that he wouldn't make the team coming north this season, which I think was the right call. As far as Miller, right now he's another "potential" guy. Flashes of brilliance, but wild as heck. The Tigers are looking to win now, so trading potential for proven performers makes sense.

I still say the one guy they should have kept was Jair Jurrjens, traded in the Renteria deal.
trading Jurrens and Miller for Rent - a - Wreck and Cabrera will prove to be a mistake. There is really nothing left to say . . .

and 4 members of the Tiger's rotation and their closer had ERA's well over 4.00 last season . . . not looking too good.

Posted: December 5, 2007 11:55 am
by drunkpirate66
SuperTrooper wrote:
CaptainP wrote:
drunkpirate66 wrote:
CaptainP wrote:Don't be so quick to bash the Tigers. They want to win NOW.
They got 2 potential Superstars who are 27 and 25 years old.
They gave up a lot of future prospects, but look at their lineup and rotation. Do they really need them?

ROTATION:
Justin Verlander
Jeremy Bonderman
Dontrelle Willis
Kenny Rogers
Nate Robertson

LINEUP:
C Rodriguez
1B Guillen
2B Polanco
SS Renteria
3B Cabrera
OF Granderson, Ordonez, Jones
DH Sheffield

Nice mix of experience and youth. Very few holes left...Robertson & Jones maybe...The bullpen is solid once Zumaya comes back from a fluke injury (hurt while escaping the fires in San Diego)


They may have given up a lot, but they also can compete with anyone in the AL now.
There should be no argument when I say: Andrew Miller is twice the pitcher of Dontrelle Willis . . . Willis got lit up in the NL . . . he is going to get slammed in the AL . . .

Miller is younger, cheaper, and most importantly better . . .

and given a year, Maybin will be a premiere outfielder . . . I argue (and I really hate fat, slow power guys) that Maybin is more valuable than Cabrera . . . now.


Overall . . . poor move for the Tigers . . . their pitching staff got worse . . . and, although they added power; it was through a fat, slow, K' machine who is a medioce defender at best.
I'll never be able to convince you any different. Not if this is your honest opinion of a career .312 hitter, who is only 25 years old and has 5 years experience already.

And your opinion of Willis is clearly based on ONE season, playing for a pathetic team. He entered 2007 with a career ERA of 3.68 and a record of 19 games above .500. One bad year has soured you. And since you seem to love the "moneyball" type of stats....look at his K to BB ratio....more than 2 to 1 over his career.
I've had my eye on Willis for a while since I assumed Florida would trade him at some point. 2007 was truly a BAD year for him. IP was way down and hits were way up. Not a good way to come to the AL, which usually bumps up ERA by 1. 5 games he didn't get out of the 4th inning. He looks like a player that needs to grow up and learn how to "pitch", not throw. I worry he might be a bit of a headcase since he seemed to spiral out of control any time things went wrong. Pitching coach Chuck Hernandez will have his hands full.
trading away Jurrens and Millers and replacing them with Willis is so f'n stupid. Willis is just going to get hammered in the AL. I bet he is in the top 5 for walks and homeruns allowed.

Posted: December 5, 2007 11:58 am
by chippewa
drunkpirate66 wrote:
chippewa wrote:All the experts say Maybin will be great in time, but he was clearly overmatched this year. Given his youth and the fact that he never played triple A, that's to be expected. But when Detroit traded Monroe and gave Maybin the job, quite often he looked like the freshman kid brought up to the varsity. Word was that he wouldn't make the team coming north this season, which I think was the right call. As far as Miller, right now he's another "potential" guy. Flashes of brilliance, but wild as heck. The Tigers are looking to win now, so trading potential for proven performers makes sense.

I still say the one guy they should have kept was Jair Jurrjens, traded in the Renteria deal.
trading Jurrens and Miller for Rent - a - Wreck and Cabrera will prove to be a mistake. There is really nothing left to say . . .

and 4 members of the Tiger's rotation and their closer had ERA's well over 4.00 last season . . . not looking too good.
I'll take my chances with the starting rotation, it's the bullpen that scares the heck out of me. Willis will be about the #4 guy (+ or - 1), so I don't think he'll be asked to go way over 200 innings like he has in the past. You can't put guys like Jason Grilli out there and expect to hold many leads. They'll outscore people in the regular season, but you can't win that way in the playoffs.

Posted: December 5, 2007 11:58 am
by CaptainP
drunkpirate66 wrote:
CaptainP wrote:I love having people here who really know baseball. I went WAY too long without having anyone to chat with. Now I have a guy at work (Todd), and the BN team. Even if Jon is wrong all the time. :P
I will go along with this too . . .

and I will make another bold prediction . . . the Brewers will not win as many games in 2008 as they did in 2007; unless they make a big move before April.

As much as I like Braun his numbers will not be, on percentage, in 162 games in 2008 as productive as he was in 2007 . . . other than errors . . . and the bull pen, in its current state, is sh it.
They're revamping the bullpen. Bringing in a lot of veterans to try out. Not really tied to any of them. David Riske, Guillermo Mota. Relief pitchers are a strange animal. Can have a great year after a bad one. That's what Doug Melvin is looking for.

They did turn down a chance to trade for Chad Cordero. Didn't want to give up Rickie Weeks.

Posted: December 5, 2007 12:00 pm
by Capt.Flock
CaptainP wrote:
drunkpirate66 wrote:
CaptainP wrote:I love having people here who really know baseball. I went WAY too long without having anyone to chat with. Now I have a guy at work (Todd), and the BN team. Even if Jon is wrong all the time. :P
I will go along with this too . . .

and I will make another bold prediction . . . the Brewers will not win as many games in 2008 as they did in 2007; unless they make a big move before April.

As much as I like Braun his numbers will not be, on percentage, in 162 games in 2008 as productive as he was in 2007 . . . other than errors . . . and the bull pen, in its current state, is sh it.
They're revamping the bullpen. Bringing in a lot of veterans to try out. Not really tied to any of them. David Riske, Guillermo Mota. Relief pitchers are a strange animal. Can have a great year after a bad one. That's what Doug Melvin is looking for.

They did turn down a chance to trade for Chad Cordero. Didn't want to give up Rickie Weeks.

Posted: December 5, 2007 12:01 pm
by CaptainP
chippewa wrote:
drunkpirate66 wrote:
chippewa wrote:All the experts say Maybin will be great in time, but he was clearly overmatched this year. Given his youth and the fact that he never played triple A, that's to be expected. But when Detroit traded Monroe and gave Maybin the job, quite often he looked like the freshman kid brought up to the varsity. Word was that he wouldn't make the team coming north this season, which I think was the right call. As far as Miller, right now he's another "potential" guy. Flashes of brilliance, but wild as heck. The Tigers are looking to win now, so trading potential for proven performers makes sense.

I still say the one guy they should have kept was Jair Jurrjens, traded in the Renteria deal.
trading Jurrens and Miller for Rent - a - Wreck and Cabrera will prove to be a mistake. There is really nothing left to say . . .

and 4 members of the Tiger's rotation and their closer had ERA's well over 4.00 last season . . . not looking too good.
I'll take my chances with the starting rotation, it's the bullpen that scares the heck out of me. Willis will be about the #4 guy (+ or - 1), so I don't think he'll be asked to go way over 200 innings like he has in the past. You can't put guys like Jason Grilli out there and expect to hold many leads. They'll outscore people in the regular season, but you can't win that way in the playoffs.
Losing Zumaya hurts

Posted: December 5, 2007 12:01 pm
by CaptainP
Capt.Flock wrote:
CaptainP wrote:
drunkpirate66 wrote:
CaptainP wrote:I love having people here who really know baseball. I went WAY too long without having anyone to chat with. Now I have a guy at work (Todd), and the BN team. Even if Jon is wrong all the time. :P
I will go along with this too . . .

and I will make another bold prediction . . . the Brewers will not win as many games in 2008 as they did in 2007; unless they make a big move before April.

As much as I like Braun his numbers will not be, on percentage, in 162 games in 2008 as productive as he was in 2007 . . . other than errors . . . and the bull pen, in its current state, is sh it.
They're revamping the bullpen. Bringing in a lot of veterans to try out. Not really tied to any of them. David Riske, Guillermo Mota. Relief pitchers are a strange animal. Can have a great year after a bad one. That's what Doug Melvin is looking for.

They did turn down a chance to trade for Chad Cordero. Didn't want to give up Rickie Weeks.
Comment?

Posted: December 5, 2007 12:07 pm
by jonesbeach10
drunkpirate66 wrote:
jonesbeach10 wrote:
drunkpirate66 wrote:
jonesbeach10 wrote:
drunkpirate66 wrote:Can't firgure out the Yankees . . .

they don't pony up the money for Dice K . . . they were outbid by the Red Sox. I know the pitching market is expensive, but I don't think a #2 or 3 starter is worth $100 million

Ok . . . but then they spend 40 something million on a nob like Kei Igawa . .
pure reaction move that flopped. He's a nob just like his buddy Carl Pavano. Won't argue that


. OK . . . . and then they go out and spend 25 million too much on Clemens .
At the time, they needed another pitcher because of the huge hole they were in. Fact of the matter is, as overpaid as he was (not gonna argue that), he provided stability to the rotation. I think the amount of shock there was over Clemens salary about equaled the amount of money Dice K got.

. . OK . . . then they won't put Ian Kennedy in a deal for Johan Santana but they will put Phillip Hughes in . . .
They did originally offer Kennedy and Melky Cabrera and mid-level, but the Twins wanted more. So they upped it with Hughes. Twins didn't like that deal and the Yankees backed out. Good for them. For as much as they would have had to pay Santana, I'd almost rather have a much cheaper Hughes or Kennedy.


OK . . . now it appears they lost Santana because of it . . . OK . . . so they sign an oldie Pettite who won't do much
Pettitte had a great year last year. Pitched great down the stretch and had the best start of any Yankee in the postseason.

. . . OK . . . and now it appears they lost out to Dan Haren at Arizona who is offering Conor Jackson . . . so now the Yankees are stuck with little no pitching and a horrible bull pen . . . OK.
As of now, their rotation is CM Wang who's going to win 15-20 games, Phil Hughes, who was brilliant for the Yankees in the postseason, and if he didn't get hurt probably would have made Clemens irrelevant last year. I think he wins 15-20 games also. Apparently, Joba is going to start because the Yankees are higher on him than they are on Hughes. If that's true, throw him in for 15-20 wins. Pettitte should give the Yankees 13-17 wins. Mussina probably 10-15. Add Kennedy in there probably for 10-15 wins if he starts. The problem for the Yankees isn't going to be starting pitching, I think they have plenty of that.

The problem is relief. As of now they have an aging Rivera, an inconsistent at best Farnsworth and Luis Vizcaino who wore down because Torre constantly turned to him. Both are 7th inning guys at best. I would love to see Joba go back to the pen a la Papelbon, and get eased into the closer role. Joba and Rivera would make one of the best 8th-9th inning guys in the majors and


:D
You are entitled to your opinion, of course . . . but Ian Kennedy, Kei Igawa, and especially Mike Mussina are worth about sh it. Kennedy could be a decent 5 starter at best on the Red Sox.

I like Wang (joke . . . here) . . . and Hughes in about a year . . . Pettite might win 12 . . . but as a whole the staff for the Yankees right now is pretty darn bad.

The bottom line is simple: as it is right now there is no way that rotation can compete with the Red Sox' rotation with or without Santana . . .
Well, I don't think many would argue that the Sox have a better rotation. I don't think however, the Rays have a better rotation on paper, when I can't name two off the top of my head without looking! After looking, yeah Kazmir's nice, but are you really going to say Jaimie Shields is better than Andy Pettitte? Can you say Matt Garza is going to be better than Phil Hughes?

Either way, Cashman said he isn't done yet, and last I heard, he was looking into Eric Bedard, and still looking into the bullpen (even though it's pretty much a crapshoot these days).
Look . . . with all due respect you are just plain wrong on Mussina. He is done. If he wins over 12 games in 2008 I will buy you and your boys a Keg . . . he is not even a starter . . .

It all started, really, with Dice K. From there, the Yankees were forced into:

1. Spending too much on Igawa who spent over half the season in the minors

2. Using way too many minor league pitchers who weren't ready for Triple A let alone the majors

3. Signing Clemens to the worst contract in the history of MLB.


The Yankees current rotation

1. Wang
2. Petitte
3. Hughes
4. Kartsens
5. Kennedy

you like that!?


The Rays . . .

1. Kazmir
2. Shields
3. Garza
4. Jackson
5. Nieman . . .

at 1/2 the cost . . . I will take the Rays. No joke.
I'm not gonna argue with you about Mussina, because he's couldn't beat a good team last year and probably wins 12 games max-I'm not counting on the keg. I still think he's the #4 or 5 starter though over Karstens. As for Hughes and Kennedy, hearing about them coming up through the minors, I guess I'm a lot higher on them than you are, and yes I understand neither has made it through an entire big league season. But then again neither has Lester or Bucholtz (sp?) assuming they don't get traded. I think we're both homers who love our team's pitching prospects :P

PS. I wasn't sure about Bedard either, but I heard about him also going to the Blue Jays, so I guess anything's possible.

Posted: December 5, 2007 12:08 pm
by CaptainP
Bedard to the Blue Jays won't happen. That was just someone's wet dream because he's a Canadian.

Posted: December 5, 2007 12:08 pm
by CaptainP
Giants are mulling an offer from Toronto....Alex Rios for Tim Lincecum.

Posted: December 5, 2007 12:10 pm
by chippewa
CaptainP wrote:Bedard to the Blue Jays won't happen. That was just someone's wet dream because he's a Canadian.
:lol: Canadians can dream too, can't they?

Posted: December 5, 2007 12:16 pm
by jonesbeach10
CaptainP wrote:Giants are mulling an offer from Toronto....Alex Rios for Tim Lincecum.
How recent is that? I had heard Rios for Lincecum and Matt Cain.