BuffettNews.com

SMLCHNG wrote:

lati2d wrote: Yeah - Is it just me or do football games inside in a dome NOT seem like REAL football?

It's not just you. I can't stand it.

I have said this before, you grow up as a kid, into pop warner, to high school and college playing football outside, then in you go pro and play inside

Does anyone know why penalty calls (like the phantom holding call on the pick off return by the Chargers) are not "reviewable...?

BottleofRum wrote: I have said this before, you grow up as a kid, into pop warner, to high school and college playing football outside, then in you go pro and play inside

Stupid, huh? Bunch of spoiled babies, some are.

what a break for Indy, the clocked stopped at 2:01, no 2 min warning until the next snap. They get an extra TO!

st.somewhere wrote:Does anyone know why penalty calls (like the phantom holding call on the pick off return by the Chargers) are not "reviewable...?

That was a judgment call by the official. Judgment calls are not reviewable. Something like twelve men on the field is reviewable.

aeroparrot wrote:

st.somewhere wrote:Does anyone know why penalty calls (like the phantom holding call on the pick off return by the Chargers) are not "reviewable...?

That was a judgment call by the official. Judgment calls are not reviewable. Something like twelve men on the field is reviewable.

No, I know which are reviewable and which aren't. My question is why are those calls not reviewable? Especially, when they (more often than not) can seriously effect the outcome of a game...

Game is not even close to being over. If Indy holds them from a 1st down they will get the ball back around mid field.

st.somewhere wrote:

aeroparrot wrote:

st.somewhere wrote:Does anyone know why penalty calls (like the phantom holding call on the pick off return by the Chargers) are not "reviewable...?

That was a judgment call by the official. Judgment calls are not reviewable. Something like twelve men on the field is reviewable.

No, I know which are reviewable and which aren't. My question is why are those calls not reviewable? Especially, when they (more often than not) can seriously effect the outcome of a game...

Unfortunately, I would have to repeat what I said. You have to keep those types of calls consistent.

TAKE THE SAFETY!!!!!

st.somewhere wrote: No, I know which are reviewable and which aren't. My question is why are those calls not reviewable? Especially, when they (more often than not) can seriously effect the outcome of a game...

I'd have to agree. So many times penalty calls are BS, and teams lose over them.

What a punt!!!

aeroparrot wrote:What a punt!!!

And another thing I hate is the "prevent" defense. Why can't a team just use the same defense that got them to the point of winning.

aeroparrot wrote:Unfortunately, I would have to repeat what I said. You have to keep those types of calls consistent.

Huh...?

Indianapolis loses its last timeout because of the injury to Reggie Wayne.

rub some dirt on it Reggie....o that's right there is no dirt.

st.somewhere wrote:

aeroparrot wrote:Unfortunately, I would have to repeat what I said. You have to keep those types of calls consistent.

Huh...?

That it was a judgment call. If there were replays on all those types of calls, the flow of the game would stop and it will become as slow as baseball.

Philip Rivers is a classless act. He needs to shut his mouth.

If anyone has Tivo or a DVR rewind it and read Phillip Rivers lips right after Clark dropped that ball.

He said... (I think...) <b>"We're going to the Superbowl"</b>

I will be sending a copy of that tape to Bill Belichick and the boys...

SMLCHNG wrote:Philip Rivers is a classless act. He needs to shut his mouth.

He looks and acts like Ryan Leaf.