BuffettNews.com

LIPH wrote:

buffettbride wrote:A vagina is just what McCain needs,

So do I, but I digress.

buffettbride wrote:

Skibo wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

BFinnsUp wrote: middle of the road Hillary people

There is no such thing. The people to whom Hillary appeals will not vote for the values Palin upholds.

McCain could have won the Hillary voters if he picked a VP who supported gay and abortion rights. There was some credibility to the recent commercial about the woman voting for a republican for the first time.

There's no way he'll get those votes now unless Palin suddenly decides she's a rug munching abortionist.

The gay community really wasn't into the Clintons.

But the Clintons were into the gay community.

McCain/Palin most definitely aren't.

TheSecretsInTheCrust wrote:

LIPH wrote:

Lightning Bolt wrote:

TheSecretsInTheCrust wrote:

Lightning Bolt wrote:A Governor for only 18 months of a distant state... before that, a mayor of a city of 8,000...
..and just a HEARTBEAT away from Presidency?!?!

This will go down as a bigger gaffe and joke than Dan Quayle's nomination of '88

Thats still more executive experience (24 months) than either Obama or Biden has.

just watch... that hardly will translate into RESPECTABILITY

Why not?

Personal opinion. Brad your hatred for Bush blurrs your thoughts beyond open thinking

AlbatrossFlyer wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

AlbatrossFlyer wrote:

buffettbride wrote: McCain could have won the Hillary voters if he picked a VP who supported gay and abortion rights.

except he would have lost 25% of the republican party vote, lost close to 90% of the mega money donors to the party, and have had a convention fight on his hands... not the best way to win an election.

but it's not like the republican party would have any other viable options to keep obama out, so by not voting mccain, they are essentially voting obama.

what would be worse for the party, 4 years for mccain (because there's no way he would be able to run again) or 8 for obama?

as a pro-choice, gay rights, balanced budget, defense hawk republican who do i vote for?

SchoolGirlHeart wrote:

AlbatrossFlyer wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

AlbatrossFlyer wrote:

buffettbride wrote: McCain could have won the Hillary voters if he picked a VP who supported gay and abortion rights.

except he would have lost 25% of the republican party vote, lost close to 90% of the mega money donors to the party, and have had a convention fight on his hands... not the best way to win an election.

but it's not like the republican party would have any other viable options to keep obama out, so by not voting mccain, they are essentially voting obama.

what would be worse for the party, 4 years for mccain (because there's no way he would be able to run again) or 8 for obama?

as a pro-choice, gay rights, balanced budget, defense hawk republican who do i vote for?

You're gonna have to run next time yourself. I volunteer to be campaign manager.

Tequila Revenge wrote: Easy there LB. The lady has some serious balls!!

Palin has a long history of run-ins with the Alaska GOP hierarchy, giving her genuine maverick status and reformer credentials that could complement McCain's image.

Two years ago, she ousted the state's Republican incumbent governor, Frank Murkowski in the primary, despite having little money and little establishment backing.

She has also distanced herself from two senior Republican office-holders, sen. Ted Stevens and Rep. Don young. Both men are under federal corruption investigations.

She had earned stripes — and enmity — after Murkowski made her head of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. From that post, she exposed ethical violations by the state GOP chairman, also a fellow commissioner.

Lightning Bolt wrote:

TheSecretsInTheCrust wrote:

LIPH wrote:

Lightning Bolt wrote:

TheSecretsInTheCrust wrote:

Lightning Bolt wrote:A Governor for only 18 months of a distant state... before that, a mayor of a city of 8,000...
..and just a HEARTBEAT away from Presidency?!?!

This will go down as a bigger gaffe and joke than Dan Quayle's nomination of '88

Thats still more executive experience (24 months) than either Obama or Biden has.

just watch... that hardly will translate into RESPECTABILITY

Why not?

Personal opinion. Brad your hatred for Bush blurrs your thoughts beyond open thinking

My hatred for George W. Bush reflects the views of 70% of America.
You can play the other side all you want, but yours does not reflect a majority of Americans.

SchoolGirlHeart wrote: You're gonna have to run next time yourself. I volunteer to be campaign manager.

AlbatrossFlyer wrote:

SchoolGirlHeart wrote:You're gonna have to run next time yourself. I volunteer to be campaign manager.

no party would have me.

hell my skeletons aren't in the closet, they're strewn all over the place.

AlbatrossFlyer wrote:

buffettbride wrote:

AlbatrossFlyer wrote:

buffettbride wrote: McCain could have won the Hillary voters if he picked a VP who supported gay and abortion rights.

except he would have lost 25% of the republican party vote, lost close to 90% of the mega money donors to the party, and have had a convention fight on his hands... not the best way to win an election.

but it's not like the republican party would have any other viable options to keep obama out, so by not voting mccain, they are essentially voting obama.

what would be worse for the party, 4 years for mccain (because there's no way he would be able to run again) or 8 for obama?

as a pro-choice, gay rights, balanced budget, defense hawk republican who do i vote for?

buffettbride wrote:

Lightning Bolt wrote:
That's Tina Fey!!!
..and I would bet you that, unless she absolutely wows 'em in the Twin Cities,
that McCain has made a politically fatal mistake in going for this unknown.

i think the 'pubs picked her so fey can return to SNL to play her in skits. "i'm not a vp candidate but i play one on tv"


tina fey is hotter

cammac wrote:Palin could go a long way to attacting the disgruntled Hillary supporters.

Lightning Bolt wrote:When the V.P.'s debate, Joe Biden is gonna eat her for lunch.
I just think she is gonna come off as a lightweight....

..waiting for her news conference now.

cammac wrote:Palin could go a long way to attacting the disgruntled Hillary supporters.

I think this pick will work out fine....

Lightning Bolt wrote:When the V.P.'s debate, Joe Biden is gonna eat her for lunch.
I just think she is gonna come off as a lightweight....

..waiting for her news conference now.

ejr wrote:

cammac wrote:Palin could go a long way to attacting the disgruntled Hillary supporters.

I think this pick will work out fine....

I still find it hard to imagine any disgruntled Hillary supporter who cares about a woman's right to choose, choosing this ticket, knowing that both are pro-life. McCain has made his strong desire to have Roe v Wade overturned and this just serves to reinforce his intent.

diverg wrote: Sarah has 6 years and 4 more children than Tina Fey. I think they are both hot though.

Sarah Palin