CaptainP wrote:Loyalty:
It's very common for a player to "test the free agent market" when their time comes.
Why would a team remain loyal to a player?
It's nice when someone spends their career with you, but if they don't...don't cry about it. Move on.
Look at how badly it ended in Green Bay for Brett Favre.
Trevor Hoffman is a Brewer.
Emmitt Smith retired with the Cardinals.
John Smoltz is an injured Red Sox.
It has, is, and will continue. There is no reason to be loyal these days...it's just nice when it actually happens.
Players in professional sports have never been loyal. Individual players have been over the years. But the majority of players from the 1920's to the present day have gone where the money is. And that is true for any sport. Too many examples to name. The last time an owner/senior officer was loyal to players in Boston (Bird, McHale, Parrish . . .) the Celtics lost for the entire decade of the 90's because Red wanted them to retire as Celtics. Retarded. Parrish went on to win another title with Jordan and the players reported to be offered for McHale combined for over 20 All Star appearances. Imagine how good the Orioles could be if the most overrated player in the history of baseball was benched or traded before his streak ended? Loyalty has rarely existed. And when it did the results are not necessarily positive. It is business. As much as we, as fans, choose to think differently it is just business. Emotion and pride come second.

