buffettbride wrote:Guns go bang bang.
just one bang this year.. deer in freezer..
Moderator: SMLCHNG
buffettbride wrote:Guns go bang bang.
HMMM.. I wasn't that close but His hands didn't look too big..bestseller92 wrote:One of the reasons I prefer handguns is that I'm not at all sensitive to handgun recoil, while anything over a .30/06 in a rifle is unpleasant for me to shoot.
One gun I need is a good 1911 -- they fit my hand perfectly.
I hear rumors, btw, that JB is a 1911 fan.
Actually, since it's a single stack auto and its grip is fairly thin, it's not really a "big hands" gun; it fits my small-medium sized mitts perfectly (as does my Ruger P97).ragtopW wrote:HMMM.. I wasn't that close but His hands didn't look too big..bestseller92 wrote:One of the reasons I prefer handguns is that I'm not at all sensitive to handgun recoil, while anything over a .30/06 in a rifle is unpleasant for me to shoot.
One gun I need is a good 1911 -- they fit my hand perfectly.
I hear rumors, btw, that JB is a 1911 fan.
isn't the 1911 a "big hands" gun.. I have only fired one a time or two..
and not in...... years?
I was gonna say the 1911 is a fairly universal sized sidearm.......not all that big........compared to my Desert Eagle .44, it's downright tiny.......bestseller92 wrote:Actually, since it's a single stack auto and its grip is fairly thin, it's not really a "big hands" gun; it fits my small-medium sized mitts perfectly (as does my Ruger P97).ragtopW wrote:HMMM.. I wasn't that close but His hands didn't look too big..bestseller92 wrote:One of the reasons I prefer handguns is that I'm not at all sensitive to handgun recoil, while anything over a .30/06 in a rifle is unpleasant for me to shoot.
One gun I need is a good 1911 -- they fit my hand perfectly.
I hear rumors, btw, that JB is a 1911 fan.
isn't the 1911 a "big hands" gun.. I have only fired one a time or two..
and not in...... years?
Lots of the double stack autos ARE "big hands" guns, since their butts/grips are fat to allow the double stack magazines inside. The Beretta 92F is one of the worst in this regard.

Probably the weight of the rifle along with the stock design. I have a friend with two 30.06s. One is fairly sweet, though a bit stiff on recoil. The other is a lightweight and kicks like a mule. I have suggested magna-porting or a muzzle brake for it to reduce the recoil. So far he has done neither.bestseller92 wrote:About the .270, a friend had a stainless/synthetic stocked Ruger a few years back that I shot and loved -- recoil was negligible. Then I bought a synthetic stocked Savage .270 and the recoil was MUCH worse. I ended up trading it to my brother who commented that it kicked harder than his Weatherby Vanguard 7mm Mag. Must be stock design. My brother has a Remington semiauto .30/06 whose recoil isn't bad at all, and strangely, my brother in law has a Savage woodstocked .30/06 that isn't bad, either. But that synthetic Savage 111 was a shoulder rocker.

