BuffettNews.com

McDonald's filet of fish is in trouble.



http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/10/science/10fish.html

popcornjack wrote:McDonald's filet of fish is in trouble.

It's an ugly-looking fish, I'll give you that, but no link, no further information? What's the story, then??

-"BB"-

I think I last had one when I was 5 years old.

They may be ugly, but they be dang tasty.

Bicycle Bill wrote:

popcornjack wrote:McDonald's filet of fish is in trouble.

It's an ugly-looking fish, I'll give you that, but no link, no further information? What's the story, then??

-"BB"-

click on the NYTimes link under the photo in the original post.

pair8head wrote:They may be ugly, but they be dang tasty.

Very true..

Karacal wrote:

pair8head wrote:They may be ugly, but they be dang tasty.

Very true..

oysters,... crabs,... lobster,...
Not lovely to look at, but high on my list of comestibles.
(Y'all Texans & sech can keep yer rattlesnake and possum, etc. That's just roadkill.)

That is one ugly fish.

Very ugly fish. And I've NEVER had one from McDonalds. I don't like that kind of fish..... give me the fresh stuff.

Never Again! barf!

I don't care what it looks like, it tastes good to me, although overpriced imo.

we are talking about food right?

Seas in my veins wrote:Never Again! barf!

Hell, if you enjoyed it while you ate it, why would you turn your nose up at it after you learnt what it was?

(Not like you were eating soylent green or something)

A. rule of seafood.. if it's ugly its good.. if it's Fugly.. It's great..
B. the same thing happened to Pollack a few years back they regulated the take and the fishery has rebounded..

Phin power..