Re: Roman Polanski detained in Switzerland
Posted: September 28, 2009 10:39 pm
And that should be 1977, not 1972
Jimmy Buffett discussion
https://www.buffettnews.com/forum/
He confessd and had a deal with the DA, but the judge was not going to honor the deal.RinglingRingling wrote:had heard this as well. Not condoning the original act in any way, but there are a lot more details to the story than the sound-byte headlines or the image the name "Roman Polanski" conjures when heard.LIPH wrote:He served 42 days back in 1972. The victim is on record asking that he get no more jail time. From what I've read, he had a deal that he wouldn't have to serve anymore time but he heard the judge wasn't going to honor the deal, that's why he fled the country.OceanCityGirl wrote:I wonder if the victim now a grown woman got somebody to intercede.
The victim, now a grown woman, just wants the whole thing to end:OceanCityGirl wrote:He is a scumbag who should be locked up. However of he regularly left France I can't believe we were unable to ge him before. I wonder if the victim now a grown woman got somebody to intercede.
Unless it was your 13 yo daughter he drugged and raped.TropicalTroubador wrote:The victim, now a grown woman, just wants the whole thing to end:OceanCityGirl wrote:He is a scumbag who should be locked up. However of he regularly left France I can't believe we were unable to ge him before. I wonder if the victim now a grown woman got somebody to intercede.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/09/29/pol ... index.html
Besides...our prisons are so overcrowded here in California, it's not like he'd serve much if any time if they *did* extradite him. We've got better use for our tax dollars here right now.