BuffettNews.com

surfpirate wrote:I've been *special* from my very first post back in 2001. I'm just sayin' ......

sunseeker wrote:

surfpirate wrote:I've been *special* from my very first post back in 2001. I'm just sayin' ......

hush...

sunseeker wrote:

surfpirate wrote:I've been *special* from my very first post back in 2001. I'm just sayin' ......

hush...

ph4ever wrote:

sunseeker wrote:

surfpirate wrote:I've been *special* from my very first post back in 2001. I'm just sayin' ......

hush...

So it's okay to eat shrimp and brag about it?

sunseeker wrote:

ph4ever wrote:

sunseeker wrote:

surfpirate wrote:I've been *special* from my very first post back in 2001. I'm just sayin' ......

hush...

So it's okay to eat shrimp and brag about it?

yes!

sunseeker wrote:to clarify my above posts -

We have ALOT of newbies that haven't been controversial and may be reading this. I don't want to scare them off by having them think that we won't associate with them if they don't have a huge post count

RinglingRingling wrote:

sunseeker wrote:to clarify my above posts -

We have ALOT of newbies that haven't been controversial and may be reading this. I don't want to scare them off by having them think that we won't associate with them if they don't have a huge post count

I wouldn't say that the 100 post minimum is a "huge" requirement...

palmettopirate wrote:Wow SeattleParrotHead. Thanks for the bubble clarification. I was seriously misinformed. When I first saw that picture I heard it was the reason Kenny and Renee broke up.

RinglingRingling wrote:

sunseeker wrote:to clarify my above posts -

We have ALOT of newbies that haven't been controversial and may be reading this. I don't want to scare them off by having them think that we won't associate with them if they don't have a huge post count

I wouldn't say that the 100 post minimum is a "huge" requirement...

sunseeker wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

sunseeker wrote:to clarify my above posts -

We have ALOT of newbies that haven't been controversial and may be reading this. I don't want to scare them off by having them think that we won't associate with them if they don't have a huge post count

I wouldn't say that the 100 post minimum is a "huge" requirement...

there are no post minimums are maximums to be a valued member here.....

RinglingRingling wrote:

sunseeker wrote:to clarify my above posts -

We have ALOT of newbies that haven't been controversial and may be reading this. I don't want to scare them off by having them think that we won't associate with them if they don't have a huge post count

I wouldn't say that the 100 post minimum is a "huge" requirement...

ph4ever wrote:

RinglingRingling wrote:

sunseeker wrote:to clarify my above posts -

We have ALOT of newbies that haven't been controversial and may be reading this. I don't want to scare them off by having them think that we won't associate with them if they don't have a huge post count

I wouldn't say that the 100 post minimum is a "huge" requirement...

have a shrimp cocktail

SeattleParrotHead wrote:Hmmm . . recent posts are either about shrimps or Chesney.
Seems to be a common theme here . . . .

Brown Eyed Girl wrote:Newsflash, people: Our government has been in bed with Big Oil for a loooong time now. Neither side of the aisle is blameless. Nor are we, the voting public, blameless either...because we keep voting these yahoos into office without researching their background, their views, their affiliations, their supporters. Many entertainers spout their political beliefs, that is nothing new either. But few actually do anything other than write a check, if that. Jimmy is trying to make a difference for the people, wildlife and environment of the gulf. How about we concentrate on that and leave the political stuff aside? For those of you lucky enough to be able to attend this event, spend a little time talking to the folks who live and work in this region and find out how they are really being affected, then report back to us. We're a resourceful group, I bet we can find a way to help. Let's stop the bickering and blaming and find out what is *really* going on...and then do what we parrotheads do best: Party with a purpose.

sunseeker wrote:Can we please refrain from making fun or laughing at the expense of others?

Please know that people are passionate about this on both side. I believe we have folks here that are intelligent enough to listen to other points of view and debate with out taking things to a personal level.

SeattleParrotHead wrote:Hmmm . . recent posts are either about shrimps or Chesney.
Seems to be a common theme here . . . .

chippewa wrote:

sunseeker wrote:Can we please refrain from making fun or laughing at the expense of others?

Please know that people are passionate about this on both side. I believe we have folks here that are intelligent enough to listen to other points of view and debate with out taking things to a personal level.

I'll assume this doesn't include politicians of both parties? Here's a great Daily Show clip, showing how the last 8 Presidents (3 Democrats, 5 Republicans) have told us how they'd get our country away from dependence on foreign oil. The original timeline of 1980 is now 2025....maybe. "We've redefined success...and still failed"

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-j ... ent-future